Re: Where stored

2012-04-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 14:57:07 -0400: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Daniil S wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > Documentation says: > > > > Initialize a destination repository for synchronization from > > another repository. > > … > > $ svnsync initialize http

Re: Where stored

2012-04-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Daniil S wrote: > Hello. > > Documentation says: > > Initialize a destination repository for synchronization from > another repository. > … > $ svnsync initialize http://svn.example.com/svn-mirror \ > http://svnbook.googlecode.com

Where stored

2012-04-14 Thread Daniil S
Hello. Documentation says: Initialize a destination repository for synchronization from another repository. … $ svnsync initialize http://svn.example.com/svn-mirror \ http://svnbook.googlecode.com/svn \ --sync-username syncuser --sync-password

corrupt repository Missing field in node-rev

2012-04-14 Thread Robin Luther
I have a subversion repository that had some corruption back 6 months ago. I knew that all I needed to do was find the corrupted db/revpros/0/XX file and replace it with a similar revisioned file and so I did not deal with it at the time. The errors are (when trying to run "verify" command):

Re: Subversion 1.6.18 released

2012-04-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 17:00:19 +0200: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:05:36AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > It's cool. I've seen projects fork and keep the same name before, and it > > wasn't pretty. > > Just to be clear: It's not a fork. It's the same project under a ne

Re: Subversion 1.6.18 released

2012-04-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:05:36AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > It's cool. I've seen projects fork and keep the same name before, and it > wasn't pretty. Just to be clear: It's not a fork. It's the same project under a new umbrella. > The COPYING file also mentions checking > http://subversi

Re: Subversion 1.6.18 released

2012-04-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 09:21:27PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > What's going on with Apache bundling? I can change the downloadable > tarball > > references in the .spec files over at http://www.github.com;nkadel/, but > > what's go

Re: Subversion 1.6.18 released

2012-04-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 09:21:27PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > What's going on with Apache bundling? I can change the downloadable tarball > references in the .spec files over at http://www.github.com;nkadel/, but > what's going on there? The 1.6 series is not distributed from apache.org for

Re: Subversion 1.6.18 released

2012-04-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I've updated, and renamed, my github repository with RPM building tools for RHEL 4, 5, and 6. https://github.com/nkadel/subversion-1.6.18-srpm I'm puhing it to Repoforge ASAP. It's not beautiful, but it seems to work well in my modest testing.

Re: svnrdump fails when access control restrictions are in place

2012-04-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andrew Sasak wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 16:53:14 -0400: > When --incremental is used, dump records all changes that the user has > access to. When --incremental is used, I think dump should dump the > whole tree that the user has access to. I can imagine that this would > be a non-trivial change