That option definitely looks interesting. From my reading, we could
use it to get apache to ignore all access restrictions except for the
SVN access file that I specify. Unfortunately my current performance
woes mostly come from the issues involved with processing the SVN
access file itself.
Joel
> strace seems to indicate I/O issues as the bottleneck. The file is
> loaded from NFS without caching.
>
> The per-repository access file seems like my best bet for an immediate
> solution. It is example 4 in this config:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/
> mod_aut
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Justin Johnson wrote on Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 13:03:04 -0500:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> >
> > > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 00:49:06 +0200:
> > > > The time until 1.7.5 is counted in weeks,
Thanks.
strace seems to indicate I/O issues as the bottleneck. The file is
loaded from NFS without caching.
The per-repository access file seems like my best bet for an immediate
solution. It is example 4 in this config:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_authz_svn/I
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 15:24, Bob Archer wrote:
>> Joel Eidsath wrote on Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:11:48 -0700:
>> > I was just handed a large SVN install with thousands of users and
>> > hundreds of individual repositories. It is experiencing serious
>> > performance issues. I believe that it most
Joel Eidsath writes:
> I was just handed a large SVN install with thousands of users and
> hundreds of individual repositories. It is experiencing serious
> performance issues. I believe that it mostly boils down to a 14MB
> AuthzSVNAccessFile.
>
> What can I do to speed this up?
Use per-reposit
> Joel Eidsath wrote on Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:11:48 -0700:
> > I was just handed a large SVN install with thousands of users and
> > hundreds of individual repositories. It is experiencing serious
> > performance issues. I believe that it mostly boils down to a 14MB
> > AuthzSVNAccessFile.
> >
>
One of our users encounters a strange order of log revisions. When
invoking an:
svn log -v -g
the top-level revision r1605930 is reported before top-level revision
r2571860. In my understanding, this should not be possible. For a log
without merged revisions included, the order is fine. How can
Hello Daniel.
I will give it a go and let you know what I find.
Jason
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Jason,
>
> I've learnt yesterday something new about the minfo-cnt corruption bug:
> it can manifest not only as absurdly high values (on the order of 2**70),
> but as f
The relevant code is in libsvn_repos/authz.c. Look at the call to
svn_repos_authz_read() in mod_authz_svn.c: the file is read and parsed
once per connection.
I guess you could cache the parsed svn_authz_t struct in a longer-lived
pool, or perhaps increase the lifetime of connections (compare the
Justin Johnson wrote on Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 13:03:04 -0500:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 00:49:06 +0200:
> > > The time until 1.7.5 is counted in weeks, and 1.6.18 is scheduled to be
> > > released next week.
> > >
> >
The syntax
except IOError, e:
is perfectly valid in Python 2.7. Are you sure you are getting that
particular error under 2.7?
You'd have to change it to this for Python 3.x:
except IOError as e:
But that would not be backwards compatible with 2.x. Using a tool like
2to3.py may help produce a v
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 00:49:06 +0200:
> > The time until 1.7.5 is counted in weeks, and 1.6.18 is scheduled to be
> > released next week.
> >
>
> The fix was merged to 1.6.x@HEAD today and barring surprises will be
> in
Hi Daniel,
Don't know about 2.5 but 2.6 is still actively maintained so I can't argue with
that. :) Guess it is just easier to install Python 2.6 than make the scripts
backwards-compatible with newer Python versions.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@ele
No, it's not a known bug. We require 2.5 or newer, so we'll be happy to
accept patches here as long as they don't break compat with those older
versions.
Daniel
(I'm assuming there are other except: statements affected by this)
Brad Lemings wrote on Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:14:30 -0700:
> Hello a
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Joel Eidsath wrote:
> I was just handed a large SVN install with thousands of users and
> hundreds of individual repositories. It is experiencing serious
> performance issues. I believe that it mostly boils down to a 14MB
> AuthzSVNAccessFile.
>
> What can I do to
Hello all,
I get the following error with Python 2.x, 3.1.x, and 3.2.x:
T:\src\subversion-1.7.4>win-tests.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "T:\src\subversion-1.7.4\win-tests.py", line 109, in
import gen_win
File "build\generator\gen_win.py", line 38, in
import generator.sw
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> But combine that with management of Java toolkits, Gnome and KDE Wallets,
> and the psvn incompatibility with older Emacs, and it's getting out of hand.
> Is it worth re-integrating to the main Repoforge codeline to support such an
> old
So, I've got someone who asked about Subversion 1.6 for RHEL 4. I've found
the old subversion-1.6.17-1.el4.1plos.src.rpm in this old thread (
http://www.svnforum.org/archive/index.php/t-40748.html) from mbaehr. And I
should recognize it, it's partly based on Repoforge work I contributed to.
And I'd
> -Original Message-
> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 22 March 2012 11:05
> To: Cooke, Mark
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; dhanushka ranasinghe
> Subject: Re: hide folder in subversion repository
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Cooke, Mark
> wrote:
>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dhanushka ranasinghe [mailto:parakrama1...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 21 March 2012 09:58
> > To: users@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: hide folder in subversion repository
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > is there any wa
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Phil Pinkerton wrote:
> Looking for a way to send or display a Notice like a MOTD ( Message of the
> day ) whenever any repository is accessed.
>
> For example there will be a major change in Repository locations. Some
> projects already have pre and post commit ho
Hi all,
we have svn through tortoisesvn successfully running 4 Years for 110 Users /
>20 documents as DMS.
SVN is successful because
a) it provides History of Projects
b) it provides very good Offline Capabilities!
c) it is simple
one important characteristic about our guys is, that they wo
Hi David,
thanks, that's awesome!
Michael
> I have a pre-commit hook that stores its configuration inside your
> repository. You'll need access to the Subversion server to set it up,
> but once it's setup, you can control access by checking out the
> control file from the repository, making your
"Kayhadrin!" writes:
> In file
> 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.5\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\wc_db.c'
> line 4501: assertion failed (affected_rows == 1)
> ---
> OK
> ---
>
> When I click on the OK button of this dialog windo
Andy Levy wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 08:02, OBones wrote:
Andy Levy wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:39, OBoneswrote:
Hello all,
Using svn cat I can see the state of a file at a given revision.
As it turns out, I have had in the past some files that were commit with
inconsistent lin
> -Original Message-
> From: Alagazam.net Subversion [mailto:s...@alagazam.net]
> Sent: 21 March 2012 19:41
> To: Brian Neal
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Problem with Python bindings to SVN 1.7.4 on Windows
>
> On 2012-03-21 20:14, Brian Neal wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21,
Hi All,
Just sending this error report I got from TortoiseSVN that suggested
me to notify this mailing list.
Context:
Windows 7 64b;
I was trying to switch my svn working copy folder to another location
(repository is using http protocol).
Suddenly, my computer started to become really slow but t
28 matches
Mail list logo
