On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> >>
> > Except for the part where not everyone should be forced to reinvent
> > the wheel of 'put the sandbox in a pristine state' as in 'cd ..;
> > rm -r $sandboxname; svn checkout -r $r
2012/3/11 nut :
> On doing an "svn status", I get a (sub-)directory listed with status
> "?", but the contents are not listed. When I try to add the directory,
> I get a message saying the directory is already under version control.
> But when I check out a fresh copy, that directory is not there.
On doing an "svn status", I get a (sub-)directory listed with status
"?", but the contents are not listed. When I try to add the directory,
I get a message saying the directory is already under version control.
But when I check out a fresh copy, that directory is not there.
Clearly, I must have scr
2012/3/9 Simon Dean :
> Hi
>
> Are there any plans to add a command to SVN that cleans a working copy or
> path of all unversioned and/or ignored files and directories?
>
> This is a very common need for automated Continuous Integration builds where
> a working copy is reused for multiple runs of
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
>>
> Except for the part where not everyone should be forced to reinvent
> the wheel of 'put the sandbox in a pristine state' as in 'cd ..;
> rm -r $sandboxname; svn checkout -r $rev $url $sandboxname', but more
> efficiently and without hitting
On Mar 10, 2012, at 01:31, crazia wrote:
> The following patch enables 'svn command' to recognizing CJK filename
> correctly in OSX
>
>
What problem happens without this patch?
The following patch enables 'svn command' to recognizing CJK filename correctly
in OSX
utf8_mac.diff
Description: Binary data
by Wolfgang cr. KO
On 3/10/2012 12:13 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:47:55 +, Les Mikesell wrote:
...
I'd argue that tools have no business removing any files they didn't
create unless you name them explicitly. And that complicated things
that you want a CI to automate should be scripted with
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:47:55 +, Les Mikesell wrote:
...
> I'd argue that tools have no business removing any files they didn't
> create unless you name them explicitly. And that complicated things
> that you want a CI to automate should be scripted with the script
> managed in your VCS anyway
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
>
> If you argue that a CI/XY tool should find out for itself what files are
> not under svn control then one could argue analogously that it should
> as well bypass svn for doing updates. :-)
I'd argue that tools have no business removing any f
10 matches
Mail list logo
