On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 18:07:29 +, Grant wrote:
...
> Ouch. If testing is done on the developer's local machine, he will
> need a full working copy and it will be impossible to restrict read
> access to one or a few files as I had planned to do with path-based
> authz. Instead, could I check out
On 10/1/2011 8:26 PM, Grant wrote:
Ouch. If testing is done on the developer's local machine, he will need a
full working copy and it will be impossible to restrict read access to one
or a few files as I had planned to do with path-based authz. Instead, could
I check out a working copy of the rep
>> Ouch. If testing is done on the developer's local machine, he will need a
>> full working copy and it will be impossible to restrict read access to one
>> or a few files as I had planned to do with path-based authz. Instead, could
>> I check out a working copy of the repository to a staging mach
On 10/1/2011 6:07 PM, Grant wrote:
Ouch. If testing is done on the developer's local machine, he will
need a full working copy and it will be impossible to restrict read
access to one or a few files as I had planned to do with path-based
authz. Instead, could I check out a working copy of the r
On Oct 1, 2011, at 20:07, Grant wrote:
>> There is a repository -- a database -- that holds your code. The current
>> version and all past versions, including, if you like, branches. This could
>> be on any server you like -- the production server, the development server,
>> a completely separ
> Again I strongly encourage you to spend time reading the book. The first
> several chapters should solidify for you how people work with Subversion.
> There's no sense in us explaining it all here on the list when writers have
> already spent years refining the words in the book. But I'll try
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Andy Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:01, Trevor Schaffer
> wrote:
>> We definitely use svn copy for revisions, but I think the issue is because
>> our tags are too flat vs not flat enough.
>>
>> E.g. tags/builds/ is where we put all of our tags (all don
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Grant wrote:
>
> Would I need to install subversion on the production machine, or would
> the subversion server running on the dev machine just treat the
> production machine as a target destination and use SSH to transfer the
> files?
How you move things around is
gprof is what I'm familiar with (nutshell: compile with 'gcc -pg' and
read gmon.out). There are no specific profiling docs for svn; if you
need more specific advice please post to the dev@ list. Thanks!
Kyle Leber wrote on Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 19:33:10 -0400:
> What method of profiling do you re
On Oct 1, 2011, at 18:15, Grant wrote:
> Would I need to install subversion on the production machine, or would
> the subversion server running on the dev machine just treat the
> production machine as a target destination and use SSH to transfer the
> files?
> So I'll be OK if I commit changes
What method of profiling do you recommend? I have used gprof previously
(it's been awhile) but am not familiar with the subversion project source
code and build setup. Is the a online guide or wiki describing the
preferred setup for performing this?
Kyle
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Daniel S
>> After committing changes to the repository on the dev machine, could I
>> use svn update instead of rsync to bring the production machine's
>> files in sync with those on the dev machine?
>
> Yes, and even better if you have an intermediate staging/testing
> space, but that may be overkill for s
Hi,
there is a bit more than just inffast.obj
Without the patch I build it this way (x86):
--- snip ---
C:\python27\python gen-make.py -t vcproj --vsnet-version=2008
--with-httpd=C:\build\httpd-2.2.19-sni6-x86
--with-openssl=C:\build\httpd-2.2.19-sni6-x86\srclib\openssl
--with-zlib=C:\build\subve
Thanks, Johan. I tested with 1.7rc4 and it did not make any perceptible
difference. Anything else I can try?
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> > I've encountered what I think is a problem with subversion, but I'm not
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 20:47:29 +0200:
> [ Please do not top-post on this list, i.e. please put your reply
> below or inline. More below ... ]
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri
[ Please do not top-post on this list, i.e. please put your reply
below or inline. More below ... ]
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
>> > I've encountered what I t
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Victor Medina
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> About compiling Subverions with BDB support,
>
> Which is the best BDB version to compile Subversion 1.6 & 1.7? Can I
> use the latest? Or there are specific recomended versions for 1.6 and
> 1.7? I'm building for windows with ap
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:00 PM, PR wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had initially got a lot of great feedback from the group.
>
> I had decided to migrate the repo using the svnsync and the new server is
> 1.7 rc3 for the POC migration. (old server 1.4.6).
>
> Initially every thing was smooth now we are no
18 matches
Mail list logo
