svn-crash-log20110818104557.log
Description: Binary data
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:36:29AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Seth Daniel
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've done many subversion installs but never have I seen the following
> > problem before.
> >
> > Vanilla Centos 5.4. Subversion 1.6.17 (compiled and packag
Hello,
Recently I upgraded from 1.6.9 to 1.6.17. 'svn up' is very noticeably
slower than it used to be. I didn't see anything in the CHANGES file
about signficant 'update' changes so I was wondering if this was expected?
With 1.6.9 I didn't turn off authz (even though I don't use it) but I
thou
Stein Somers wrote on Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 20:41:44 +0200:
> On 18-Aug-11 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >What copyfrom would the single directory have, in the case of an add/add
> >conflict?
>
> The same as if you resolve an add/add file conflict by manually
> throwing the two file contents into o
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 08:41:44PM +0200, Stein Somers wrote:
> On 18-Aug-11 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >What copyfrom would the single directory have, in the case of an add/add
> >conflict?
>
> The same as if you resolve an add/add file conflict by manually
> throwing the two file contents int
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 07:22:28PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:13:09 +, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> ...
> > But I don't think subversion should enforce one particular merge outcome.
> > My opinion is that the user should be given a choice, and be supported
> > by an interac
On 18-Aug-11 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
What copyfrom would the single directory have, in the case of an add/add
conflict?
The same as if you resolve an add/add file conflict by manually throwing the two
file contents into one file: you may wish a double copyfrom, to trace back to
both origi
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:13:09 +, Stefan Sperling wrote:
...
> But I don't think subversion should enforce one particular merge outcome.
> My opinion is that the user should be given a choice, and be supported
> by an interactive conflict resolution prompt that shows all possible
> resolution str
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 16.08.2011, 11:14 -0400 schrieb Mark Phippard:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Martin Kutter
> wrote:
> > is there a way to receive get post-commit error messages on performing a
> > commit with the JavaHL bindings?
>
> Subclipse uses JavaHL and I believe it shows these
Markus Schaber wrote on Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 17:30:59 +0200:
> Hi,
>
>
> Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 04:54:15PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can Subversion 1.7 still have tree conflicts?
> >
> > Yes. Nothing much has changed on th
On Aug 18, 2011, at 11:39, André Hänsel wrote:
> I am using Subversion with TortoiseSVN over HTTPs.
>
> Now that I access my SVN server in Germany from Thailand and displaying logs
> and getting diffs is horribly slow, I wonder if I can enable any kind of
> compression?
The topic recently came
Hi list
I am using Subversion with TortoiseSVN over HTTPs.
Now that I access my SVN server in Germany from Thailand and displaying logs
and getting diffs is horribly slow, I wonder if I can enable any kind of
compression?
Regards,
André
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 05:30:59PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> My idea was that directories itsself would never conflict. If there's a
> directory removed, and a new one created with the same name, it is the
> same directory, so no tree conflict. If the directories have different
> properties, t
Hi,
Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 04:54:15PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can Subversion 1.7 still have tree conflicts?
>
> Yes. Nothing much has changed on that front for 1.7.
> Foundations for some bigger changes in tree-conflict behaviou
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 04:54:15PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can Subversion 1.7 still have tree conflicts?
Yes. Nothing much has changed on that front for 1.7.
Foundations for some bigger changes in tree-conflict behaviour planned
for 1.8 and later are already being worked on.
> Or
Hi,
Can Subversion 1.7 still have tree conflicts?
Or can the new working copy break them down to individual conflicts on
files (and directory properties)?
Best regards
Markus Schaber
___
We software Automation.
3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Markus Schaber | Develope
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: 18 August 2011 12:12
> To: David Aldrich
> Cc: 'users@subversion.apache.org'
> Subject: Re: Could not read chunk delimiter: Secure connection truncated
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:19:34AM +, David Aldrich
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:12:34PM +0500, Waseem Bokhari wrote:
> Hi Guys!
> Tortoise SVN throwing an error on Commit:-
>
> "REPORT of '/svn/projectname/!svn/vcc/default':Could not read chunk
> size:Secure connection truncated(project URL)"
>
> My perception is this belongs to
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:19:34AM +, David Aldrich wrote:
> Hi
>
> One of our remote svn users is getting the following error when he attempts
> to checkout a repo from our svn server:
>
> svn: REPORT of '/subversion//!svn/vcc/default': Could not read chunk
> delimiter: Secure connection t
Hi
One of our remote svn users is getting the following error when he attempts to
checkout a repo from our svn server:
svn: REPORT of '/subversion//!svn/vcc/default': Could not read chunk
delimiter: Secure connection truncated ()
We know that our repo is in good order because checkouts on the
Hi Guys!
Tortoise SVN throwing an error on Commit:-
"REPORT of '/svn/projectname/!svn/vcc/default':Could not read chunk
size:Secure connection truncated(project URL)"
My perception is this belongs to Network Traffic or Fluctuation in Network:
- Is this TRUE?
Pls share your r
21 matches
Mail list logo
