Re: Worst Error Message?

2011-08-01 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Monday 01 August 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 8/1/11 8:30 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: >> Are you really serious? > > No, Thanks, that confirms it. Sorry, but this discussion is pointless. Uli ** Domino Laser

Do svn:externals changes need to be committed to work?

2011-08-01 Thread André Hänsel
I am trying to add an svn:externals definition to a working copy. I set the property on a directory and ran svn update on that directory, but nothing is fetched. I found this article: http://blogs.gnome.org/johannes/2008/02/20/svnexternals-for-noobs/ However, from other documentation it's unclear

cannot create directory in /db/transactions/

2011-08-01 Thread Michael Chen
Dear there, The user "svntest" has a ssh account on the server, and he executes this to show the permission of directory "transaction": [svntest@chen src_ampl]$ ls -l /home/svn/spuc/db/ total 28 -rw-rwSr-- 1 chensy spuc8 Jul 30 16:02 current -r--rwSr-- 1 root spuc2 Mar 11 11:53 format

RE: how to back svn repositories

2011-08-01 Thread Venkata Badipatla
Svnadmin dump utility is a correct strategy to be followed. As you are telling many repos, you can write simple perl script which can create the dump files for all the repos. --Venkat From: zhiwei chen [mailto:zhiw...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:38 AM To: users@subversion.apache

how to back svn repositories

2011-08-01 Thread zhiwei chen
hi,everyone. We have many svn repositories,more than 100,000 , but every repository has less than 1024M. So,which svn backup strategies should I use ?

RE: Integration of SVN and Bugzilla 3.2

2011-08-01 Thread Wang, HarryX C
Thank you Nico. -Original Message- From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 2:35 PM To: Wang, HarryX C Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Integration of SVN and Bugzilla 3.2 On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Wang, HarryX C wrote: > Is it p

Re: 1.7 check-swig-py failure

2011-08-01 Thread Daniel Shahaf
I can't keep track of the chain of reversions there. Can you post this to dev@ please with a description of the regression --- i.e., how specifically the results you get from invocation X in 1.6.x differ from the results of X in 1.7.0-beta2, and where do you think configure.ac/Makefile.in are wron

Re: Read-Only file systems (Was: Worst Error Message?)

2011-08-01 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:16:53PM +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2011/8/1 Stefan Sperling : > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:38:46PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > >> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:12:41PM +0200, Markus Schaber wr

Re: SVN Error on Commit!!

2011-08-01 Thread Michael Diers
On 2011-07-29 07:21, Waseem Bokhari wrote: > Really hard to know what to suggest with so little information. > > What version of TortoiseSVN on the client? > >>> Its 1.6.x "TortoiseSVN " > > What version of SVN on the server? What OS on the server? >>> We are using Visual SVN Server 2.1.3 Ente

Re: Integration of SVN and Bugzilla 3.2

2011-08-01 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Wang, HarryX C wrote: > Is it possible to integrate Subversion with Bugzilla?   I would like to > track what files the developer(s) changed for every bug. Bugzilla is perl based, not even compiled. So anything is *possible*. It's not built-in, but a fast Google sea

Integration of SVN and Bugzilla 3.2

2011-08-01 Thread Wang, HarryX C
Is it possible to integrate Subversion with Bugzilla? I would like to track what files the developer(s) changed for every bug. Harry C. Wang Validation Engineer Location: Jones Farm 4 - 2nd Floor - Pole H4 Lab Location: Jones Farm 1 - 2nd Floor - Room 1210 Cell Phone # 425 - 260 - 6891 Quote(s)

Re: Read-Only file systems (Was: Worst Error Message?)

2011-08-01 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/8/1 Stefan Sperling : > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:38:46PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] >> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:12:41PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote: >> > > Can subversion cope with repositories and working-copies on >> read-on

RE: branch sync with unversioned files results in versioned file being deleted when reintegrated

2011-08-01 Thread Varnau, Steve (Neoview)
From: C L [mailto:cl_...@hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 8:52 PM To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: branch sync with unversioned files results in versioned file being deleted when reintegrated Hey all, I found this oddity today with a branch which had an unversioned file in a c

Re: upgrading source code in local repository

2011-08-01 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:47:50PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:17:36 +, Brecht Ameije wrote: > ... > > But when I try it, I doesn't work as flawless as I thought it would: > > It dumps a list with all added/deleted files and gives each of them a > > number. > > Than you

Re: Read-Only file systems (Was: Worst Error Message?)

2011-08-01 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:38:46PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote: > > Hi, > > Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:12:41PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote: > > > Can subversion cope with repositories and working-copies on > read-only > > media? > > > > > > Maybe so

Re: upgrading source code in local repository

2011-08-01 Thread Andreas Krey
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:17:36 +, Brecht Ameije wrote: ... > But when I try it, I doesn't work as flawless as I thought it would: > It dumps a list with all added/deleted files and gives each of them a > number. > Than you have to manually connect the correct numbers to say which ones > are actua

AW: Read-Only file systems (Was: Worst Error Message?)

2011-08-01 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:12:41PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote: > > Can subversion cope with repositories and working-copies on read-only > media? > > > > Maybe some Live-Demo CD bringing an example SVN repository? > > No. So subversion needs wr

Re: Read-Only file systems (Was: Worst Error Message?)

2011-08-01 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:12:41PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote: > Can subversion cope with repositories and working-copies on read-only media? > > Maybe some Live-Demo CD bringing an example SVN repository? No. If you want to make a live CD, put the repository and working copies on a ramdisk or

Re: 1.7 check-swig-py failure

2011-08-01 Thread tsteven four
I believe I have chased this down to r878293, a change to apr.m4 and aprutil.m4. SVN_APR_LIBS and SVN_APRUTIL_LIBS used to be set based on --link-libtool, now they are set on --link-ld. But when building the swig-py target the libraries are linked with libtool and thus according to the apr-1-conf

Read-Only file systems (Was: Worst Error Message?)

2011-08-01 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Von: Ulrich Eckhardt [mailto:ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com] > Consider something is inherently read-only (e.g. a > CDROM) or the server just failed to fulfill my request because it ran out > of diskspace. Just out of curiosity: Can subversion cope with repositories and working-copies on

Re: Worst Error Message?

2011-08-01 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/1/11 8:30 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: On Monday 01 August 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: On 8/1/11 2:47 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: On Saturday 30 July 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: From a security perspective it is a bad idea to tell a network client that is doing something you have explicitly den

Re: Worst Error Message?

2011-08-01 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Monday 01 August 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 8/1/11 2:47 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: >> On Saturday 30 July 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> From a security perspective it is a bad idea to tell a network client >>> that is doing something you have explicitly denied any of the details >>> of how t

Re: AW: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi, On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:54:59 +, Markus Schaber wrote: > ... > > AFAICs, the SvnKit people are the only project really trying to develop > an independend SVN implementation, and they go through great pains, even > down to re-implement

Re: AW: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/1/11 2:37 AM, Manuel Lemos wrote: As I mentioned before, I needed to see traffic to SSL servers, which you cannot see with Wireshark unless you have the server private SSL key, which is not the case. Thanks for the tip anyway. If you have read access to a full repository, you should be

Re: Worst Error Message?

2011-08-01 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/1/11 2:47 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: On Saturday 30 July 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: From a security perspective it is a bad idea to tell a network client that is doing something you have explicitly denied any of the details of how the system is configured to prevent it. Working correctly i

AW: AW: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Andreas, Von: Andreas Krey [mailto:a.k...@gmx.de] > > On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:52 +, Markus Schaber wrote: > ... > > Hmm. For http(s)://, svn:// and well set-up svn+ssh:// servers, he > > should not be able to create repository corruption, right? I would > > consider everything else to b

Re: AW: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/1/11 3:38 AM, Andreas Krey wrote: ... AFAICs, the SvnKit people are the only project really trying to develop an independend SVN implementation, and they go through great pains, even down to re-implementing SQLite... It always irritated me why one would use SQL in a place like the svn

Re: upgrading source code in local repository

2011-08-01 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Friday 29 July 2011, Brecht Ameije wrote: > I read the referred page in the book, indeed: the script svn_load_dirs.pl > is exactly what I need. It implements the steps that I did by hand. There is one thing that took me a while to understand when starting to use that: This doesn't preserve you

Re: Subversion: list of respositories

2011-08-01 Thread Neil Bird
Around about 01/08/11 05:02, Andy Canfield typed ... I am user andy. I can point my browser to "http://SERVER/svn/subdoc"; or even "http://SERVER/svn/fred3"; with no problem, but not "http://SERVER/svn"; -- 403 Forbidden. I think I've done everything that the documentation says I should do, but

Re: Subversion Branch/Merge Graphical Display

2011-08-01 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Monday 01 August 2011, Tony Butt wrote: > Some tools (noticeably TortoiseSVN and kdesvn) are quite capable of > showing the branch history. I wonder, what exactly do you mean with that? The reason I ask is because there is nothing in SVN that provides you a mapping from trunk to all branches

Re: Subversion Branch/Merge Graphical Display

2011-08-01 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:50:36 +, Tony Butt wrote: ... > In any event, does anyone know of a tool which will provide such a > history? I have the same question, as the only (more or less) practical way I know of is using 'git svn' and gitk. The tools I knew and forgot only showed the history tr

Re: AW: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:54:59 +, Markus Schaber wrote: ... > AFAICs, the SvnKit people are the only project really trying to develop an > independend SVN implementation, and they go through great pains, even down to > re-implementing SQLite... It always irritated me why one would use SQL in a

AW: Subversion Branch/Merge Graphical Display

2011-08-01 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Tony, Von: Tony Butt [mailto:tony.b...@cea.com.au] > Some tools (noticeably TortoiseSVN and kdesvn) are quite capable of > showing the branch history. I have found nothing which is capable of > showing merge history. I would have thought that with the advent of > svn:mergeinfo, that sufficie

Re: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 04:16:49 +, Manuel Lemos wrote: ... > Maybe I am missing something but it seemed that those repeated requests > were redundant and make svn program much slower than it should. Quite. GPRS has a round-trip time of about a seconds. This immediately translate to every remote

AW: Subversion Branch/Merge Graphical Display

2011-08-01 Thread Stuempfig, Thomas
Try subeclipse. You can rightclick on he rev and display the merge graph then. It is still not trivoal since you just see the merge rev prop. Regards Thomas Email sent from blackberry. Von: Tony Butt [mailto:tony.b...@cea.com.au] Gesendet: Monday, August 01, 2011 06:50 AM An: users@subversion.ap

Re: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 04:20:07 +, Manuel Lemos wrote: ... > Been there, tried that, but wireshark does not decrypt SSL traffic > unless you have the server SSL key, which is not the case because the > server is not under my control. You can man-in-the-middle yourself to see that is going on on

Re: AW: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:52 +, Markus Schaber wrote: ... > Hmm. For http(s)://, svn:// and well set-up svn+ssh:// servers, he > should not be able to create repository corruption, right? I would > consider everything else to be a serious security bug in subversion. Setting invalid svn:mergein

RE: gzip compression (was: Re: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests)

2011-08-01 Thread ehu...@gmail.com
Please note that many of the responses subversoin sends are already compressed as binary difference streams against the previous version. Gzip compression on REPORT responses isn't going to yield an average factor 5 compression rate. Erik. Sent from my Nokia phone -Original Message- Fr

Re: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 1, 2011, at 01:57, Markus Schaber wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> Don't reinvent the wheel, because you probably >> won't get it quite right, and you'll cause weird error messages or >> possibly even repository corruption. > > Hmm. For http(s)://, svn:// and well set-up svn+ssh:// serve

Re: gzip compression (was: Re: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests)

2011-08-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 1, 2011, at 02:16, Manuel Lemos wrote: > Anyway, another odd thing is that the client always sends a request header > saying it can handle HTTP compression but SubVersion servers seem to never > compress responses. > > Given than a typical gzip encoding can compress text data about 5 ti

Re: Worst Error Message?

2011-08-01 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Saturday 30 July 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > From a security perspective it is a bad idea to tell a network client that > is doing something you have explicitly denied any of the details of how > the system is configured to prevent it. Working correctly is usually a > yes or no question and thi

Re: AW: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello Markus, on 08/01/2011 03:54 AM Markus Schaber said the following: Hi, Von: Manuel Lemos [mailto:mle...@acm.org] Sorry, I did not mention that I am writing a pure PHP client Hmm. Somehow even this Idea increases my headache level... AFAICs, the SvnKit people are the only project reall

Re: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello Bert, on 07/31/2011 09:11 AM Bert Huijben said the following: Does httpclient work if you switch it to the cURL option? You may need to extend the class to provide https specific curl options [1]. [1] http://unitstep.net/blog/2009/05/05/using-curl-in-php-to-access-https- ssltls-protected

Re: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello Les, on 07/31/2011 01:52 PM Les Mikesell said the following: On 7/30/11 10:34 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: Yes, it is. But it's not your problem, and I don't see why the http 'wire' protocol needs to be a undocumented secret. If you want to see the wire protocol, just run wireshark on your

Re: Logging Subversion client HTTP requests

2011-08-01 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello Andreas, on 07/31/2011 12:34 AM Andreas Krey said the following: The interesting point is that as far as I know there is a complete change in the http-level protocol coming up, to avoid the massive round-trip count the current method needs. (But that's a maintenance nightmare for libsvn as