Henry Hartley wrote:
>I have VisualSVN 2.1.9 running on a Windows Server 2008.
>[...]
>The hook file, which is meant to update a checked out version of a web site
>located
>where the web server expects it, has the following three lines (not counting
>comments,
>also, the last two lines below are
Hello everyone!
I've been struggling with a configuration problem for a few days and I can't
seem to find an acceptable solution. I'll try to explain as clearly as I
can!
The host I've set up for SVN repositories is svn.eratech.ca.
I'd really like to have visual access to my repositories from any
I have VisualSVN 2.1.9 running on a Windows Server 2008. I have dumped and
loaded a repository from a soon to be retiring Windows Server 2003 machine
running VisualSVN 2.1.4.
I copied a working hook (post-commit.bat) from the old machine to the new and
as far as I can tell, the permissions ever
Hello all.
I tried searching and could not find any answers to this question, but I
apologize if this has come up before and I missed it.
This is in regard to behavior of an svnsync mirror repository (not the
master) in 1.6.11. The mirroring is up and running fine, with commits
on the maste
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Butler [mailto:sbut...@elego.de]
> Sent: 08 June 2011 13:49
> To: Cooke, Mark
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 14:33 , Cooke, Mark wrote:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: 08 June 2011 13:28
> >
On Jun 8, 2011, at 14:33 , Cooke, Mark wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 08 June 2011 13:28
>> To: Johan Corveleyn
>> Cc: Andreas Krey; Ryan Schmidt; Schroeder, Hartmut;
>> users@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn copy (ser
> -Original Message-
> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 08 June 2011 13:28
> To: Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: Andreas Krey; Ryan Schmidt; Schroeder, Hartmut;
> users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn copy (server-side) into existing folder
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
>> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 05:16:42 +, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> ...
>>> This behavior is consistent with the unix cp command and should therefore
>>> not be unexpected.
>>
>> It is not unex
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Randolph, Christian [USA]
wrote:
> "Actually, I don't think we know that. The security based refusal to allow
> electronic communications between the systems will hamper *any* multi-homed
> development effort. We need to find out the extent of that restriction to
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 05:16:42 +, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> ...
>> This behavior is consistent with the unix cp command and should therefore
>> not be unexpected.
>
> It is not unexpected, but stupid. As 'svn cp' is also the tool to
> create tag
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 05:16:42 +, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
...
> This behavior is consistent with the unix cp command and should therefore not
> be unexpected.
It is not unexpected, but stupid. As 'svn cp' is also the tool to
create tags, it is rather strange that you can just do
svn cp ${base}/t
"Actually, I don't think we know that. The security based refusal to allow
electronic communications between the systems will hamper *any* multi-homed
development effort. We need to find out the extent of that restriction to give
good advice."
The restrictions are due to government classificati
On Jun 8, 2011, at 04:50, Schroeder, Hartmut wrote:
> I am using svn 1.6.16 on MS Windows.
>
> D:\svn copy http://server/svnrepo/trunk/base/install
> http://server/svnrepo/tags/test_1.0.0 -m test
This creates tags/test_1.0.0 as a copy of trunk/base/install
> D:\svn copy http://server/svnrepo/t
Hi,
I am using svn 1.6.16 on MS Windows.
D:\svn copy http://server/svnrepo/trunk/base/install
http://server/svnrepo/tags/test_1.0.0 -m test
D:\svn copy http://server/svnrepo/trunk/base/install
http://server/svnrepo/tags/test_1.0.0 -m test
D:\svn copy http://server/svnrepo/trunk/base/install
htt
Morning,
Recently, when any user merges up from trunk to their topic branch, svn
appears to do it directory by directory for immediate sub-directories of
the branch root, so each sub-directory gets explicit mergeinfo.
[X:\XYZ.11650]svn merge http://svn.example.net/ABCD/Source/trunk
--- Merging r
15 matches
Mail list logo