Hello:
When using OO in MATLAB, directories (or classes) are prefixed with an '@'.
Subversion, however, uses the @ for peg revisions. Due to subversion thinking
the @ delineates a peg revision, it is impossible to name a directory
'@className' and check that directory into svn. Is there a wa
In a working repository, I started to having the following error message:
Commit
Commit failed (details follow):
Can't open activity db: Unrecognized resolver error
I checked that svn/repo/dav and it has 777 permissions, then I chown all the
repo with 777 but still have the same error
Any ideas?
Does make's output say anything about the libraries in question? You
should see compilation statements scroll by while make runs.
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 05:23:51PM +0100, Ian Sidor wrote:
> I tried --disable-shared but I still didn't get any libsvn*.dylib files.
>
> Is there anything else I can
Static libraries end in .a, not .dylib, those are shared.
Blair
On May 19, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Ian Sidor wrote:
> I tried --disable-shared but I still didn't get any libsvn*.dylib files.
>
> Is there anything else I can try?
>
>
> On 19 May 2011, at 07:47, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> Just ignore
I tried --disable-shared but I still didn't get any libsvn*.dylib files.
Is there anything else I can try?
On 19 May 2011, at 07:47, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Just ignore the file you don't need then?
>
> Or try --disable-shared
>
> Ian Sidor wrote on Thu, May 19, 2011 at 00:00:45 +0100:
>> I'm
Guten Tag Christian Gils,
am Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2011 um 15:33 schrieben Sie:
> I'm kind of stuck as to how to fix this. Can I try to insert mocked-up
> empty revisions in place of the zeroed ones so that svn can proceed with
> dumping the more recent half of the repository or is there a better way
Hi,
do I have to open an issue for this?
Am 17.05.2011 13:24, schrieb Daniel Shahaf:
I committed
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=r1104092
before I saw this mail from you.
(please add dev@ to CC if needed)
Christoph Bartoschek wrote on Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:06:47 +0200:
Hi,
On Wednesday 18 May 2011, Christian Gils wrote:
> I've version 1.5.6 using FSFS stored on ext3 (RHEL 5.4). The repository
> contains about 39k revisions. Revisions 0-36672 are fine and dump
> without any problems. Revisions 36673-8 fail to verify and give the
> following error:
>
> svnadmin: Rev