On Apr 9, 2011, at 22:40, richardcav...@mail.com wrote:
> I realize that my working copy has a .svn directory with information in it
> that SVN uses. In the book, it says on page 19 (page 41 of the pdf):
>
> "If you accidentally remove the .svn subdirectory, the easiest way to fix the
> probl
Hi, everyone.
I realize that my working copy has a .svn directory with information in
it that SVN uses. In the book, it says on page 19 (page 41 of the pdf):
"If you accidentally remove the .svn subdirectory, the easiest way to
fix the problem is to remove the entire containing dir- ectory (
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 20:12, Gu Shiyuan wrote:
> Hi,
> which command can tell me the repository address of a working directory?
> Thanks.
svn info
Hi,
which command can tell me the repository address of a working directory?
Thanks.
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 17:42:21 +0200:
>> So I would recommend staying with 1.6.x for up to 6 months even after 1.7.0
>> is released. Unless you really need one of the new 1.7.x features right away.
>
> We ha