But then once you commit --keep-locks the rename, you'll have to also
move the lock from /f1/foo to /f2/foo, right?
For that matter:
% svn add iota
% svn ci -mm iota
% svn mv iota kappa
% svn lock kappa
% svn ci --keep-locks -m rename ./
should also move the lock from iota to kappa. (currently i
bdu12 wrote on Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 16:31:10 -0700:
> Hello all,
>
> Thanks for your help. Here are some answers to your questions.
>
> fs-type is fsfs.
>
> "Incremental backup" was done using my own script that looked at
> timestamps of files. It doesn't matter how this works it just means I
Hello all,
Thanks for your help. Here are some answers to your questions.
fs-type is fsfs.
"Incremental backup" was done using my own script that looked at
timestamps of files. It doesn't matter how this works it just means I
am missing some of my revision files that were created on the dates
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:40:38 +0200:
> Specifically for the fs/repos separation: support for hooks and authz
> lives at the repos layer, not at the fs layer.
And editors. (svn_delta_editor_t)
All public APIs are concurrent-safe (interprocess and intraprocess),
including the public svn_fs APIs.
The layer stacking (high to low) is: client > ra > repos > fs
Specifically for the fs/repos separation: support for hooks and authz
lives at the repos layer, not at the fs layer.
Clifford Yapp
Are those (svn_repos/svn_ra) the API levels that allow safe read/write
access from multiple clients to the repository?
I did manage to get a basic svn_fs test working (very cool!), but it
did look like that might be too low-level for safety.
Cheers,
CY
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Daniel Sha
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Paul Graham wrote:
> The "Lines" field of svn log is puzzling. It says how many lines of comment,
> etc., follow the header line.
> It is therefore about as informative as "this page intentionally left
> blank". Yet in its location in the log
> message it rese
The "Lines" field of svn log is puzzling. It says how many lines of comment,
etc., follow the header line. It is therefore about as informative as "this
page intentionally left blank". Yet in its location in the log message it
resembles the cvs "lines-changed" field enough to be misleading.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 14:50:30 +0100:
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Paul Graham wrote:
>> >> I could find all the change versions of a file, then
Hi,
I am working on a tool to establish performance benchmarks for
Subversion. Primary goal would be to have some controlled tests for
doing release to release comparison. The immediate goal is to come up
with something to compare the performance of current release with the
development going on
Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:38:10 +0100:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 08:12:57PM -0400, Clifford Yapp wrote:
> > Hi! I'm looking at using the subversion libraries to handle data, and
> > I would like to integrate them into an application for
> > revisioning/managing computer aide
You probably want to use the svn_repos or svn_ra API, not the FS API directly.
That said: see svn_test__set_file_contents(), used by fs-test.c .
Clifford Yapp wrote on Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 13:02:03 -0400:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> > The LGPLv2 and APLv2 are
Hallo List,
I wonder if there is already a naming scheme for property names.
Certainly we all know that the subversion native properties have a prefix
of "svn:". Prefixes of "tsvn:" for tortoise properties (?) and "bugtraq:"
for bug tracking purposes are also invented.
But what about sire in
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 14:50:30 +0100:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Paul Graham wrote:
> >> I could find all the change versions of a file, then do an svn diff for
> >> each change, then parse the output a
Run the tests with -v and check that 'svn' prints output in English?
Glen Cooper wrote on Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 20:45:13 -0700:
> Thanks Mark,
>
> Any idea why including them would cause certain tests to fail?
>
> I'm not sure how significant this is, but I get these messages during my
> build:
>
Other points:
* The terms used are unclear.
(Example: 'incremental backup' could mean 'zfs/lvm snapshot', could
mean "find -mtime | xargs tar", and could mean 'incremental dump'.)
I'd rather get a concrete set of facts (read: one that doesn't require
me to guess what the facts are) befor
Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:17:19 +0100:
> For the missing revisions, you will need to manually replay the *exact*
> changes made in them (using checkout and commit from a working copy),
> so that future revisions fit on top.
>
> If that doesn't get you anywhere, a more low-le
Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:17:19 +0100:
> Then copy in new revision files from incremental backups, and also copy
> or adjust the 'current' file.
s/adjust/svnadmin recover/
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.co...@siemens.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 12:38 PM
> To: Jans Ullrich; subversion-20...@ryandesign.com
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Unexpected behaviour with SVNPath/SVNParentPath mixture
>
> > The quest
> -Original Message-
> From: ullrich.j...@elektrobit.com
> [mailto:ullrich.j...@elektrobit.com]
> Sent: 25 March 2011 10:32
> To: subversion-20...@ryandesign.com
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Unexpected behaviour with SVNPath/SVNParentPath mixture
>
> Hi Ryan,
>
> > -
Greetings!
I haven't found the info regarding this as well But
have a couple of Solutions that may help you:-
1) You may use "SVN Commit Monitor" or any other Monitoring tool.
2) You can restrict permissions on Tagging/Branching folders that will make
sure that anyone who want
Hi Ryan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-20...@ryandesign.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 2:25 AM
> To: Jans Ullrich
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Unexpected behaviour with SVNPath/SVNParentPath mixture
>
> You will either want a single
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:25, Gerd Feldkirch wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> is it possible to implement a server side pre-tag/pre-branch hook?
> I can't find any information about it...
Tags & Branches are just copies that follow a naming convention. From
a hook-triggering perspective, they'r eno differ
Hi there,
is it possible to implement a server side pre-tag/pre-branch hook?
I can't find any information about it...
Regards Gerd
Still happens with 1.6.16. Am I the only one? Any idea, at least, of what is
causing this behaviour?
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:07, Ole Pinto wrote:
> Hello, I've just began in a new job and, due to the repo organization, I've
> found a problem I didn't have before. I'm using the command line ve
25 matches
Mail list logo
