How to use custom path for config file

It would be very useful to be able to compile Subversion to use a different path than /etc/subversion/config for the default configuration file. Is this possible? I've also asked on ServerFault . Cheers, Victor

Re: subversion cross compile (arm)

Hi! I continued the work on my issue. It seems to be a memory allocation or over-writing problem. There is the section (see between HEADER_TEXT and HEADER_TEXT OK) where it calling representation_string, which has to generate the 'text: ...' string. I printed out the input parameters. Later, ther

Re: svn:ignore with recursive and non-recursive patterns

On 12/02/2010 10:23 AM, Steve Cohen wrote: On 12/01/2010 12:29 PM, Steve Cohen wrote: I have a need to define a number of svn:ignore patterns in my project. Some are specific directories somewhere in my project tree. Others are particular file types created by a build process such as *.o which

Re: Unable to lock error: what is going on here?

On 12/02/2010 05:24 PM, Bob Archer wrote: On 12/02/2010 08:39 AM, Bob Archer wrote: $ svn update svn: Unable to lock 'utscmd' $ svn propget svn:ignore utspkg_src utscmd utslib utsbin utstool utscmd is a subdirectory of the current working directory. It is included in svn:ignore. Why is svn

RE: SVN Path Authorization

Thanks Jamie. I didn't know it's already available, very useful... I will take up the rest with you privately. -Original Message- From: JamieEchlin [mailto:jamie.ech...@credit-suisse.com] Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 4:24 AM To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: SVN Path Aut

RE: Unable to lock error: what is going on here?

> On 12/02/2010 08:39 AM, Bob Archer wrote: > >> $ svn update > >> svn: Unable to lock 'utscmd' > >> > >> $ svn propget svn:ignore > >> utspkg_src > >> utscmd > >> utslib > >> utsbin > >> utstool > >> > >> utscmd is a subdirectory of the current working directory. It > is > >> included in svn:igno

Re: Unable to lock error: what is going on here?

On 12/02/2010 08:39 AM, Bob Archer wrote: $ svn update svn: Unable to lock 'utscmd' $ svn propget svn:ignore utspkg_src utscmd utslib utsbin utstool utscmd is a subdirectory of the current working directory. It is included in svn:ignore. Why is svn even trying to lock this directory? The seq

Re: question about --revision DATE

Andy Levy wrote: On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:55, Geoffrey Myers wrote: Andy Levy wrote: On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:21, Geoffrey Myers wrote: I'm hoping someone can explain the following output to me: svn log --revision {2010-12-02}:{2010-12-02}

Re: wild card support for authz

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Andy Levy wrote: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:36, Kriparam Faraday wrote: >> Hi, >> I am not sure if this feature is part of the current 1.6 release. We have >> created groups based on their work function(like developers, QA etc...). The >> developers get RW access

Re: question about --revision DATE

Andy Levy wrote on Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 14:15:53 -0500: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:55, Geoffrey Myers > wrote: > > Andy Levy wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:21, Geoffrey Myers > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> I'm hoping someone can explain the following output to me: > >>> > >>>  svn log --rev

Re: question about --revision DATE

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:55, Geoffrey Myers wrote: > Andy Levy wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:21, Geoffrey Myers >> wrote: >>> >>> I'm hoping someone can explain the following output to me: >>> >>>  svn log --revision {2010-12-02}:{2010-12-02} >>>

Re: question about --revision DATE

Andy Levy wrote: On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:21, Geoffrey Myers wrote: I'm hoping someone can explain the following output to me: svn log --revision {2010-12-02}:{2010-12-02} r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (W

Re: question about --revision DATE

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:21, Geoffrey Myers wrote: > I'm hoping someone can explain the following output to me: > >  svn log --revision {2010-12-02}:{2010-12-02} > > r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec

question about --revision DATE

I'm hoping someone can explain the following output to me: svn log --revision {2010-12-02}:{2010-12-02} r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines svn log --revision {2010-12-01}:{2010-12-0

Re: svn:ignore with recursive and non-recursive patterns

On 12/01/2010 12:29 PM, Steve Cohen wrote: I have a need to define a number of svn:ignore patterns in my project. Some are specific directories somewhere in my project tree. Others are particular file types created by a build process such as *.o which may be found in any number of directories.

Re: wild card support for authz

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:36, Kriparam Faraday wrote: > Hi, > I am not sure if this feature is part of the current 1.6 release. We have > created groups based on their work function(like developers, QA etc...). The > developers get RW access to everything including the documentation folder > and t

Re: Funky branch problem

On 12/02/2010 10:39 AM, Andy Levy wrote: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:23, Tom Halliley wrote: > >> Dunno if you can see these screen shots or not: >> >> >> >> >> >> on the left is a file that is correctly shown as existing on the trunk and >> release. The file on the right only appears to be o

Re: Funky branch problem

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:23, Tom Halliley wrote: > > Dunno if you can see these screen shots or not: > > > > > > on the left is a file that is correctly shown as existing on the trunk and > release.  The file on the right only appears to be on the trunk.  I'd expect > to see to release branch f

wild card support for authz

Hi, I am not sure if this feature is part of the current 1.6 release. We have created groups based on their work function(like developers, QA etc...). The developers get RW access to everything including the documentation folder and the source folder. The QA group gets RW in the documentation folde

Re: external file

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Scott Yan wrote: >   Below is our situation: >   There are a dozen sub-factories in our company , and we develop our ERP > system ourselves, because there are very much diffrences between factories, > our project became a dozen versions, which means we have a dozen

Re: Funky branch problem

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:00, Tom Halliley wrote: > > I have a release branch, which was created from trunk.  Most of the files on > the release branch look normal (e.g., a revision graph shows both the trunk > and release branch as part of the file's history).  But for a few files, the > revis

Funky branch problem

I have a release branch, which was created from trunk. Most of the files on the release branch look normal (e.g., a revision graph shows both the trunk and release branch as part of the file's history). But for a few files, the revision graph only shows the files on the trunk, not on the release

Re: pattern for specifying svn:ignore for files without extension

On Dec 2, 2010, at 08:43, Luke Imhoff wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:31 -0600, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> svn:ignore patterns are apr_fnmatch() patterns, and apr_fnmatch() does >> accept regex-like [a-z] expressions in its patterns, so you could try >> >> [a-z][a-z][a-z][a-z][a-z] >> >> to ignore

Re: pattern for specifying svn:ignore for files without extension

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:31 -0600, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 13:33:50 -0600: > > > > On Dec 1, 2010, at 13:31, Steve Cohen wrote: > > > > > The build process of the application I am bringing under svn creates a > > > number of unix binary executables that

RE: Unable to lock error: what is going on here?

> $ svn update > svn: Unable to lock 'utscmd' > > $ svn propget svn:ignore > utspkg_src > utscmd > utslib > utsbin > utstool > > utscmd is a subdirectory of the current working directory. It is > included in svn:ignore. Why is svn even trying to lock this > directory? > > The sequence of event

RE: question about *.merge-right.r*

> I have a branch of trunk that I'm doing some work it. Someone > committed changes to ^/trunk that I wanted, so I ran "svn merge > ^/trunk" in a wc of my branch. > > One of the files had a conflict, and I postponed resolution. I > opened > the myfile.merge-left.r* and found the old version of the

Re: svn:ignore with recursive and non-recursive patterns

Steve Cohen wrote on Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:48:05 -0600: > On 12/02/2010 12:23 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> You can use 'propedit --editor-cmd=script.sh **/', where script.sh >> appends '*.o' to argv[1]. >> > Does svn propset svn:ignore accept the **/filename idiom as a legitimate > pattern indic

Re: svn:ignore with recursive and non-recursive patterns

On 12/02/2010 12:23 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: You can use 'propedit --editor-cmd=script.sh **/', where script.sh appends '*.o' to argv[1]. Another example, the following is a "Fix typo in the log message" idiom: % svn propedit --revprop -r69426 --editor-cmd 'sed -i s/foo/bar/' svn:log Steve Cohe

Re: external file

On 02/12/2010, at 20:30, Scott Yan wrote: > Hi, > > At first, thanks for your great works, but our company really need > inter-repository file-externals feature which is not supported now, so , is > there any plan to do this? > > Below is our situation: > There are a dozen sub-facto

Having problems using SVNParentPath and AuthzSVNAccessFile while on

Hey users. ☺ I am setting up a server (svn.example.com) to host multiple projects. I have attempted to add the AuthSVNAccessFile directive, but this has broken the SVNParentPath (collection of repos) page. I am able to work around it using , but this breaks our current environment (devs alre

Re: Specifying a start revision number for a new repository

On Wednesday 01 December 2010, benstoe...@aol.com wrote: > Until now the source codes revisions were organized manually without > any version controol system in formof f backups and the current > revision is 197. I have already set up a svn server with an empty > repository and want the revision nu

external file

Hi, At first, thanks for your great works, but our company really need inter-repository file-externals feature which is not supported now, so , is there any plan to do this? Below is our situation: There are a dozen sub-factories in our company , and we develop our ERP system oursel

RE: SVN Path Authorization

Ramesh Nadupalli wrote: > > What are the other characters supported in the apache authorization file > (AuthzSVNAccessFile)? Any documentation available? > > In case if there are any human errors in the authorization file, its > making > repository unavailable. Is there a tool/mechanism to c