Re: Version caching

2010-11-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Kevin Connor Arpe wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question about version caching.  I am using the latest > (stable) version on both Linux and WinSlows. > > As I understand Subversion, once a version is committed, basically it > can never changed.  A version is written

Re: Version caching

2010-11-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
In Subversion 1.7, text-bases are stored in a SHA-1-keyed store (as opposed to a pathname-based store in 1.6 and earlier), and the "old" text-base aren't always removed as soon as there is no working copy file corresponding to them. (I tried committing a file in one wc and updating that file in an

Re: Version caching

2010-11-21 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andy Levy wrote on Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:14:43 -0500: > Subversion only caches logs on the client. Subversion itself doesn't. I'm told TortoiseSVN does.

Re: Version caching

2010-11-21 Thread Andy Levy
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:54, Kevin Connor Arpe wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question about version caching.  I am using the latest > (stable) version on both Linux and WinSlows. > > As I understand Subversion, once a version is committed, basically it > can never changed.  A version is written i

Re: Version caching

2010-11-21 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Kevin Connor Arpe! > I have a question about version caching. I am using the latest > (stable) version on both Linux and WinSlows. > As I understand Subversion, once a version is committed, basically it > can never changed. A version is written in stone. > If that is true, I was hop

Version caching

2010-11-21 Thread Kevin Connor Arpe
Hello, I have a question about version caching. I am using the latest (stable) version on both Linux and WinSlows. As I understand Subversion, once a version is committed, basically it can never changed. A version is written in stone. If that is true, I was hoping Subversion could cache each v