> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Tashjian [mailto:ct...@thepond.com]
> Sent: Friday, 5 November 2010 11:20
> To: Daniel Shahaf
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svnserve.exe (Win32) using 2GB of memory and then crashing?
>
>
> > Wrong format file. Please look at the fil
2010/11/12 Ryan Schmidt :
> On Nov 11, 2010, at 18:33, San Martino wrote:
>
>> $ svn mkdir file:///home/x/repo/tag/change001/
>> $ svn copy --parents file:///home/x/repo/trunk/test/java_imports
>> file:///home/x/repo/tag/change001/
>> $ svn ls file:///home/x/repo/tag/change001/
>> java_imports
>>
>
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
>
> By design, the handling of checksums is sane.
> Checksums are stored in the repository, and are calculated by the
repository
> layer. A client can only tell the repository what it expects the checksum
to be.
> When the client sends content, the re
On Nov 11, 2010, at 18:33, San Martino wrote:
> $ svn mkdir file:///home/x/repo/tag/change001/
> $ svn copy --parents file:///home/x/repo/trunk/test/java_imports
> file:///home/x/repo/tag/change001/
> $ svn ls file:///home/x/repo/tag/change001/
> java_imports
>
> From the help "svn copy --parents
Hello Johan
2010/11/11 Johan Corveleyn :
> I think you can also make a tag or branch of a subset of files
> completely on the server (without the need to create a sparse working
> copy first). This can be done with the --parents option of "svn copy",
> and multiple SRC arguments (which can all be
Klaus Ganser wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:09:51 -0800:
> It would be nice for this feature to see the light of day.
For this, we'll need a design that makes it possible to answer the
query efficiently.
Feel free to submit one; our documentation is in the text files
subversion/libsvn_fs_base/n
Dear users,
I am working in a team of approximately 20 developers, we are using server
version 1.6.13 and Tortoise client 1.6.11.
We have noticed several problems, but are not sure whether the problems are in:
1. server part,
2. client part, or
3. our usage of both of them.
Basically, they have
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> So, as far as I'm concerned, I think you can file this as a new
> feature request in the issue tracker (maybe first search for any
> similar outstanding requests).
Filed the bug here:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:18 PM, San Martino wrote:
> 2010/11/11 Cooke, Mark :
>>> > > Database/
>>> > > Scripts/
>>> > > Packages/
>>> > > Application Server
>>> > > libs/
>>> > > servlets/
>>> > >
>>> > > while /tag and branch/ are empty
>>> > >
>>> > > There are hundreds of files under
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:10 PM, San Martino wrote:
> Is there a way with one command to sparse-checkout al the elements
> of the path to file1.txt (included) but no more than those elements ?
See the following thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-users/201011.mbox/%3caan
On 11/10/2010 3:05 PM, San Martino wrote:
Hello Ryan,
Of course the cleanest way is to checkout the whole trunk/ and tag the
trunk each time.
A single checkout of the whole / directory is tens of GB over a
network (non-LAN), multiply this for all the deveopers.
But this should only have to h
On 11/11/2010 5:18 AM, San Martino wrote:
2010/11/11 Cooke, Mark:
Database/
Scripts/
Packages/
Application Server
libs/
servlets/
while /tag and branch/ are empty
There are hundreds of files under each directory. We want to
preserve this layout, since it's basically impossible to
r
On 11/11/2010 3:18 AM, San Martino wrote:
> How are tags really "cheaps"
> (time and space on disk) when the whole /trunk is measured in Gbs of
> data? Is there really a point to tag the whole /trunk when we just
> intended to make a change to a real project?
>
> thanks
http://svnbook.red-bean.c
On Nov 11, 2010, at 06:23, Neson Maxmelbin (RBEI/EMT5) wrote:
> I want to setup two repositories , so I have configured two
> sections in the httpd.conf and it seems to work.
> My Question is , is this a good practice or will this cause some
> errors/issues?
>
> The reason I want to do this
On 11/11/2010 8:48 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
Guten Tag Les Mikesell,
am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 um 14:37 schrieben Sie:
Doesn't the client understand the file history if you 'svn switch' to the tag
path in a working copy and just get the differences, if any?
OK, maybe I'm wrong, beca
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 um 14:37 schrieben Sie:
> > Doesn't the client understand the file history if you 'svn switch' to the
> > tag path in a working copy and just get the differences, if any?
If you use switch, it will only trans
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Jonathan dos Santos
wrote:
> generally we need to develop both in the trunk and the tag and sometimes
> that’s really frustrating – mainly because some processes are huge and after
> each minimal change we need to test it over and over in a dozen ways, I try
> my b
It's a little late for you, but I've found that sometimes it is best
to start "clean" and give up your old history. Just keep your old
repository around if you need this information.
There are many times I've moved a group to Subversion, and we simply
copied over the end points of branches, and re
Guten Tag Les Mikesell,
am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 um 14:37 schrieben Sie:
> Doesn't the client understand the file history if you 'svn switch' to the tag
> path in a working copy and just get the differences, if any?
OK, maybe I'm wrong, because I don't use svn switch but always use
comple
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 11. november 2010 14:29
> To: Engebakken Geir
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svnsync error
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Engebakken Geir
> wrote:
> > I have this error that I have
> I would like to know how tags and branches are "cheap copy" in terms
> of time and space.
>
> Since we can't reorganize the layout, we will need to tag big
> directories (about 500 Mb) even if we just sparse-chechkout single
> files.
> This operation might be done up to 10 times per day.
> Is thi
On 11/11/10 4:16 AM, San Martino wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know how tags and branches are "cheap copy" in terms
of time and space.
Since we can't reorganize the layout, we will need to tag big
directories (about 500 Mb) even if we just sparse-chechkout single
files.
This operation might be
On 11/11/10 5:57 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
Guten Tag San Martino,
am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 um 11:16 schrieben Sie:
Since we can't reorganize the layout, we will need to tag big
directories (about 500 Mb) even if we just sparse-chechkout single
files.
This operation might be done up t
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 03:10:19PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:29:14 +0100:
> > I'm not sure what svnadmin verify is doing wrong in your case.
> > But I know that there are corruptions it doesn't detect, and we're
> > planning to improve this situa
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Engebakken Geir
wrote:
> I have this error that I have searched the net for,and found a lot of
> incidents similar, but I cannot find a way to resolve this. The error is
> well known, I think :
>
> svnsync: Cannot accept 'svn:ignore' property because it is not e
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Feldhacker, Chris
wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Klaus Ganser [mailto:kgan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 2:43 PM
> To: Feldhacker, Chris
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: History of a fixed path across all objects
>
Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:29:14 +0100:
> I'm not sure what svnadmin verify is doing wrong in your case.
> But I know that there are corruptions it doesn't detect, and we're
> planning to improve this situation:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3706
What'
>
Linedata Limited
Registered Office: 85 Gracechurch St., London, EC3V 0AA
Registered in England and Wales No 3475006 VAT Reg No 710 3140 03
-Original Message-
> From: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.co...@siemens.com]
> Sent: 11 November 2010 12:50
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: Nes
> From: Neson Maxmelbin (RBEI/EMT5)
> Sent: 11 November 2010 12:23
> Subject: SVN help : multiple repo configuration
>
> Hello ,
>
> I have setup SVN 1.6 with Apache 2.2 on a Windows Server 2003
> R2 virtual server.
>
> I want to setup two repositories , so I have configured two
> sections
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:55:49PM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> >
> > > It's 100% consistent. I get the same checksum error, on the same file,
> > every time. I have a supposed "good" copy of the slave repo, at rev
> 4050...
> > which will fa
Hello ,
I have setup SVN 1.6 with Apache 2.2 on a Windows Server 2003 R2 virtual server.
I want to setup two repositories , so I have configured two
sections in the httpd.conf and it seems to work.
My Question is , is this a good practice or will this cause some errors/issues?
The reason I wa
Not really sure that this was necessary either.
Unbelievable.
PATI MOSS
System Engineer Sr. Professional
CSC
From:
opensrcguru
To:
Patricia A Moss/USA/c...@csc
Date:
11/09/2010 03:37 PM
Subject:
Re: locking down access to a repository
I highly recommend you read this and perhaps re-post.
Guten Tag San Martino,
am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 um 11:16 schrieben Sie:
> Since we can't reorganize the layout, we will need to tag big
> directories (about 500 Mb) even if we just sparse-chechkout single
> files.
> This operation might be done up to 10 times per day.
> Is this operation r
I found out svn:ignore is not a revision property, so that is why I could not
find it. It is a versioned property, so I tried this :
Y:\util>svn pg svn:ignore
https://svn.edb.com/repos/java/cards/cap/cap_client/tr...@54271
?\216stmarka
-
Golf.url
And then it is obvious that it contains non UTF
2010/11/11 Cooke, Mark :
>> > > Database/
>> > > Scripts/
>> > > Packages/
>> > > Application Server
>> > > libs/
>> > > servlets/
>> > >
>> > > while /tag and branch/ are empty
>> > >
>> > > There are hundreds of files under each directory. We want to
>> > > preserve this layout, since it'
Hello,
I would like to know how tags and branches are "cheap copy" in terms
of time and space.
Since we can't reorganize the layout, we will need to tag big
directories (about 500 Mb) even if we just sparse-chechkout single
files.
This operation might be done up to 10 times per day.
Is this opera
>
Linedata Limited
Registered Office: 85 Gracechurch St., London, EC3V 0AA
Registered in England and Wales No 3475006 VAT Reg No 710 3140 03
-Original Message-
> From: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.co...@siemens.com]
> Sent: 11 November 2010 08:50
> To: Giulio Troccoli; users@subversion.a
> -Original Message-
> From: Giulio Troccoli [mailto:giulio.trocc...@uk.linedata.com]
> Sent: 11 November 2010 08:45
> Subject: RE: Help or suggestions on porting to subversion
>
> [CUT]
>
> >
> > > The thing we want is:
> > > - checkout single/scattered files from different directories
[CUT]
>
> > The thing we want is:
> > - checkout single/scattered files from different directories
> > - modify/commit them
> > - group the files and tag this group (only the files in this group).
> >
> This is not AFAIK directly possible in subversion (or any
> other similar tool that I have used
>
Linedata Limited
Registered Office: 85 Gracechurch St., London, EC3V 0AA
Registered in England and Wales No 3475006 VAT Reg No 710 3140 03
-Original Message-
> From: San Martino [mailto:sanmrt...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 10 November 2010 23:10
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: S
(please do not top-post on this list)
> 2010/11/10 Ryan Schmidt :
> >
> > On Nov 10, 2010, at 14:09, San Martino wrote:
> >
> > > we are porting hundreds of projects from an old versioning
> > > system to subversion. We would like to make use of the trunk,
> > > tag and branch concepts. For the c
41 matches
Mail list logo
