Guten Tag Paul Maier,
am Donnerstag, 21. Oktober 2010 um 01:48 schrieben Sie:
> So I want to post to the list, that I am a user who IS looking for
> German output.
Me too.
> Finally I found the full compilation including German support and BDB at
> Win32Svn at http://alagazam.net. These are the
Johan,
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 11:59 +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Tony Butt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 18:23 +1100, Tony Butt wrote:
> >> I have had 2 unusual occurrences with merges with some of our software
> >> engineers here in the last month. I wrote th
Hi Mark,
So I want to post to the list, that I am a user who IS looking for
German output. That was quite an installation procedure, first to install
then deinstall CollabNet's binaries (because not internationalized)
then the same for WANdisco's binaries.
Also both, CollabNet and Wandisco, don't
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:30 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
> If I have root access to the filesystem, it doesn't matter what SSH
> does to try to encrypt the password...
Typo. s/SSH/SVN/
--
David Brodbeck
System Administrator, Linguistics
University of Washington
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> No. system_auth is still the NFS standard for internal use in both
> academic and professional environments. auth_dh has uses, but it
> doesn't help against any machine with allocated or cracked local root
> access. This isn't your "local
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> It would be trivial to fork svn to lie and report that it only stored
> passwords encrypted, stick that forked client on my machine and hey
> presto, away I go storing my password in plaintext.
If someone is *that* determined to shoot th
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Paul Maier wrote:
>> I can answer for the CollabNet binaries. We do not compile it with
>> the internationalization support included so you will only see English
>> messages.
>
> I would be interested in the reasons for this decision.
I would guess it was an ove
Hi Mark,
thanks for having answered.
> I can answer for the CollabNet binaries. We do not compile it with
> the internationalization support included so you will only see English
> messages.
I would be interested in the reasons for this decision.
Paul
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Paul Maier wrote:
> I would be interested in why the Windows binaries from CollabNet and WANdisco
> aren't able to print messages from svn commands in German language to the
> console.
>
> (Whereas the binaries from Win32Svn at http://alagazam.net are able to do
Hello!
I would be interested in why the Windows binaries from CollabNet and WANdisco
aren't able to print messages from svn commands in German language to the
console.
(Whereas the binaries from Win32Svn at http://alagazam.net are able to do so!)
The internationalization module seems to be miss
Hello!
I would be interested, if this problem is fixed in the
current 1.7 trunk.
svn cleanup should be able to repair and unlock the WC.
Unfortunately I am not able to build the trunk from source
myself.
Here is a reproduction script that produces a corrupt WC, and no
svn command can repair it
Andy:
> As I asked earlier, why must PartA & PartB in a given project be
> separate repositories? Why is the more conventional approach not
> workable for you?
>
I understand what you are trying to say and I agree but let's just say that
my hands are tied without going into too much details. Thi
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 15:10, Tech Geek wrote:
>>The other way you could do this, if you insist upon PartA & PartB being
>> separate repositories, is to have a different >block for each
>> project, and specify SVNParentPath as /var/lib/svn/ProjectB . Then you could
>> have PartA & PartB set up
>The other way you could do this, if you insist upon PartA & PartB being
separate repositories, is to have a different >block for each
project, and specify SVNParentPath as /var/lib/svn/ProjectB . Then you could
have PartA & PartB set up as separate >repositories - albeit with a lot more
manageme
I got past the issue and wanted to post my solution here for other SVN
admins/users. HTH.
> I've got a distant user who cannot reliably view the SVN log messages
> Using TortoiseSVN. If he 'refreshes', he can view the SVN log messages
> fine. Also, checkouts work fine. Other users at his (dist
2010/10/20 Gonzalo Rodríguez-Baltanás Díaz
> Hello
>
> Maybe you can help me to achieve this:
>
> GitHub has support for Read Only SVN repo of every Git repo. I want to use
> this to mirror the GitHub repo to a SVN Repo in the servers of my School.
>
> But I got some errors messages that I don't
Hello
Maybe you can help me to achieve this:
GitHub has support for Read Only SVN repo of every Git repo. I want to use this
to mirror the GitHub repo to a SVN Repo in the servers of my School.
But I got some errors messages that I don't understand. I am stuck. Maybe you
can enlighten my path
Hi SVN,
We're stuck for the time being with server 1.4.2 but have updated our svn
client(s) on Windows PCs (most of use Cygwin, CollabNet command line client and
Tortoise) periodically over the last year or two.
About 7 or 8 months ago, we began using svn:externals heavily.
At the time, I cou
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:11, Andy Levy wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 20:52, Tech Geek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My repository path is /var/lib/svn for the SVN server. However I encountered
>> a unique situation as follow:
>>
>> The following works:
>> #svnadmin create /var/lib/svn/projectA
>>
>>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 20:52, Tech Geek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My repository path is /var/lib/svn for the SVN server. However I encountered
> a unique situation as follow:
>
> The following works:
> #svnadmin create /var/lib/svn/projectA
>
> From a svn client:
> #svn co http://svnserver/svn/projectA p
Sorry for bumping this one...We really need to find a solution/workaround
for this in order for our SVN implementation to be final.
Thanks in advance!
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Tech Geek wrote:
> oops...I had a typo:
>
>
>> However the following does NOT work:
>> #mkdir /var/lib/svn/proj
> [Please do not top-post on this list, add / insert your response in
> line]
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.co...@siemens.com]
> > Sent: mercoledì 20 ottobre 2010 15.43
> > To: Andrea Antonio Maleci; Andy Levy
> > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: R
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:17, Andrea Antonio Maleci
> wrote:
> Is it possible to checkout only files (not patch, but entire files)
> from a specific revision ?
>
> From: Andy Levy [mailto:andy.l...@gmail.com]
> Yes, use the --revision option for svn co.
>
> "Andrea Antonio Maleci" wrote
[Please do not top-post on this list, add / insert your response in line]
> -Original Message-
> From: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.co...@siemens.com]
> Sent: mercoledì 20 ottobre 2010 15.43
> To: Andrea Antonio Maleci; Andy Levy
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: can I checkout
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Andrea Antonio Maleci
wrote:
> Is it possible to checkout only files (not patch, but entire files) from a
> specific revision ?
You can use the -r parameter on a checkout or update to specify the
revision. You cannot checkout a single file, but you can checkout th
[Please do not top-post on this list, add / insert your response in line]
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Levy [mailto:andy.l...@gmail.com]
> Sent: mercoledì 20 ottobre 2010 15.25
> To: Andrea Antonio Maleci
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: can I checkout only a revision
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:33, Andrea Antonio Maleci wrote:
> It retrieves entire repository at specified revision, not only the modified
> one...
You cannot check out an individual file.
You can update specific files to a particular revision with svn update
--revision FILE
You can export an
It retrieves entire repository at specified revision, not only the modified
one...
-Original Message-
From: Andy Levy [mailto:andy.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: mercoledì 20 ottobre 2010 15.25
To: Andrea Antonio Maleci
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: can I checkout only a revision f
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:17, Andrea Antonio Maleci wrote:
> Is it possible to checkout only files (not patch, but entire files) from a
> specific revision ?
Yes, use the --revision option for svn co.
Is it possible to checkout only files (not patch, but entire files) from a
specific revision ?
Thanks,
A.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Kriparam Faraday wrote:
> Can someone tell me the difference between a 1.4.2 repository and 1.6.12
> repository? I recently upgraded all our repositories(along with the
> subversion server) from 1.4.2 to 1.6.12. I ran the svnadmin verify, tested
> check-in, check-
31 matches
Mail list logo
