Les Mikesell wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 16:19:55 -0500:
> I think the negative comments came from people who thought it would be a
> client option, not an administrative command.
Today it is a client command (as in: 'svn obliterate $URL'), with a hook
script that has to explicitly allow it (j
Luis Rojas wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 15:16:17 -0400:
>
> On 2010-09-24, at 1:27 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Luis Rojas wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:42:07 -0400:
> >> suddenly the revision in the copy started passing verification, so we
> >> replaced that file in the original repository
On 9/24/2010 4:08 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Am I wrong in thinking that similar accidents happen to everyone
eventually and that a feature to fix them would be desirable?
Yes, the feature has its use case. And if you'd like to see it
implemented yesterday, that's cool. Just don't assume that
On Sep 24, 2010, at 00:17, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:27:40 -0500:
>>> Am I wrong in thinking that similar accidents happen to everyone
>>> eventually and that a feature to fix them would be
On 2010-09-24, at 1:27 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Luis Rojas wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:42:07 -0400:
>> suddenly the revision in the copy started passing verification, so we
>> replaced that file in the original repository and all was well...
>
> Did you compare the contents of the file in
Luis Rojas wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:42:07 -0400:
> suddenly the revision in the copy started passing verification, so we
> replaced that file in the original repository and all was well...
Did you compare the contents of the file in the original repository with
the contents of the file you
Morning,
After experiencing some weird issues with our working svn repository. we
would like to see if anybody can shed some light on how this happened,
the fix ended up being doing an svnadmin dump and svnadmin load in a new
repository. But, what really puzzled us is the why and how, any ideas
reg
On 9/24/2010 2:26 AM, David Huang wrote:
Am I wrong in thinking that similar accidents happen to everyone
eventually and that a feature to fix them would be desirable?
Yes, the feature has its use case. And if you'd like to see it
implemented yesterday, that's cool. Just don't assume that e
David Huang wrote on Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:26:18 -0500:
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:17 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> > wrote:
> >> Yes, the feature has its use case. And if you'd like to see it
> >> implemented yesterday, that's cool. Just don
On Friday 24 September 2010, Hari shankar wrote:
> i have structure like this in SVN repo
>
> root-dir
>
>-- child-proj-1
>
>-- child-proj-2
>
> i want to give path to root dir and checkout all the child projects
> directly.
>
> i.e. i want to give a command something like
> *svn checkout h
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Itamar O wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am serving multiple Subversion (1.6.12) repositories with Apache (2.2)
> over Windows (Server 2008).
> My setup is a multi-project intranet server, so I configured it to serve
> all projects using SVNParentPath
> on of the main com
i have structure like this in SVN repo
root-dir
|
-- child-proj-1
|
-- child-proj-2
i want to give path to root dir and checkout all the child projects
directly.
i.e. i want to give a command something like
*svn checkout https://svn.repo/root-dir*
in a local dir named C:\workspace (say
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:26 AM, David Huang wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:17 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>>> Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:27:40 -0500:
Am I wrong in thinking that similar accidents happen t
On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:17 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:27:40 -0500:
>>> Am I wrong in thinking that similar accidents happen to everyone
>>> eventually and that a feature to fix them woul
14 matches
Mail list logo
