Definitely 1.7.0. I don't know if it'll be in 1.6.x too. (If
1@head still reproduces the bug, and you can find the specific
revisions in trunk's history that fix the bug, let us know and maybe we
can backport those revisions to 1.6.x in order to have the fix in
1.6.13.)
Michael Saunders wrot
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Sperling writes:
> > > Remote "load" seems scary -- How can I prevent my users from being
> > able to use this command? Is the original
> > > author of the dumped
> > revision preserved, or is the author set to the user doing the load?
> > Can users do
> > > anything else bad, l
Hi Jon,
Jon Foster writes:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Yes:
> >
> > svn propset --revprop svn:author
> > svn propset --revprop svn:date
> >
>
> But not by default. Changing revprops has to be explicitly enabled by
> the repository administrator. To do this, the server admin has to
> explicitly
Hi Itamar,
Itamar O writes:
> This is exactly a tool I need!
We're glad you like it :)
> I wonder if the dev team has mind-reading abilities...
Hehe, I suppose it helps to think of it that way ;)
In reality, I developed a major part of svnrdump outside the tree, and
merged it into the tree whe
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: donderdag 19 augustus 2010 13:30
> To: Ramkumar Ramachandra
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] svnrdump: A new dumper/ loader in trunk
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 08:02:02PM +, Ramkum
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Greg Alexander wrote:
> I am a very new Subversion user and am trying to get a post commit hook script
> working. My Subversion is running on linux. The script I want to add would
> add the
> needs-lock property to every file that didn't have a lock. Any pointers
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's now a new tool located in subversion/svnrdump. We have
> developed it over the last few weeks, and we feel that it is mature
> enough to announce. Although it has not been tested extensively, we
> would like to encourag
Barry Warsaw wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 16:46:57 -0400:
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >Barry Warsaw wrote on Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 17:38:04 -0400:
> >> Does anybody have any additional information? Is anybody working on
> >> fixing the failing Python 2.7 tests? Is there
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Feldhacker, Chris wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 15:27:25 -0500:
> > Ramkumar:
> > > Again, I expect that access control/ security is automatically
taken care
> > > of in the RA layer. `svnrdump load` is just like a user making
some changes
> > > and committing them one by o
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 15:25:51 -0500:
> On 8/19/2010 3:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Let me say that even more clearly: svnrdump is a new CLIENT-SIDE tool.
>> It did not change a millimeter in the server code or in the network
>> protocols. That severly limits the extent of s
On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>(Just to clarify, this is about the *python bindings* tests, not about
>the Python tests of the core C binaries subversion/svn*/)
Yes, I believe that's correct.
>Barry Warsaw wrote on Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 17:38:04 -0400:
>> Does anybody have an
Feldhacker, Chris wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 15:27:25 -0500:
> Ramkumar:
> > Again, I expect that access control/ security is automatically taken care
> > of in the RA layer. `svnrdump load` is just like a user making some changes
> > and committing them one by one except the author and timest
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 08:02:02PM +, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Feldhacker, Chris principal.com> writes:
> > Remote "dump" makes sense -- and I assume everything being dumped is
> subject to the authorization/access
> > control restrictions that have
> been put into place on the server, ye
Ramkumar:
> Again, I expect that access control/ security is automatically taken care
> of in the RA layer. `svnrdump load` is just like a user making some changes
> and committing them one by one except the author and timestamp in the
> dumpfile are preserved. Why would you want to block this?
On 8/19/2010 3:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Let me say that even more clearly: svnrdump is a new CLIENT-SIDE tool.
It did not change a millimeter in the server code or in the network
protocols. That severly limits the extent of security issues it can
introduce.
I guess it would be the equivalen
Let me say that even more clearly: svnrdump is a new CLIENT-SIDE tool.
It did not change a millimeter in the server code or in the network
protocols. That severly limits the extent of security issues it can
introduce.
Feldhacker, Chris wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 14:14:30 -0500:
> Any "rough" d
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 15:49, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> In the future, could you just type the error messages instead of attaching
> jpegs.
On Windows, the content of any pop-up like the one attached here can
be copied to the clipboard via CTRL-C (this isn't a well-advertised
feature). Then the ful
(Just to clarify, this is about the *python bindings* tests, not about
the Python tests of the core C binaries subversion/svn*/)
Barry Warsaw wrote on Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 17:38:04 -0400:
> Does anybody have any additional information? Is anybody working on fixing
> the failing Python 2.7 tests?
Feldhacker, Chris principal.com> writes:
> Remote "dump" makes sense -- and I assume everything being dumped is
subject to the authorization/access
> control restrictions that have
been put into place on the server, yes? (A particular path or file
won't be
> included in the dump if the user doesn
In the future, could you just type the error messages instead of attaching
jpegs.
* I don't read non-text attachments on this list. And I don't think I'm
alone at that.
* that way is more friendly to search engines
Patrick Fletcher wrote on Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:53:09 -0400:
> Hello,
>
>
Here is a transcript with current trunk, it seems the issue is fixed, do
you agree?
[[[
% $svn cl foo iota
A [foo] iota
% $svn mv iota iota2
A iota2
D iota
% $svn st
--- Changelist 'foo':
D iota
A +iota2
% touch kappa
% $svn add kappa
A kappa
% $svn cl bar kappa
On 8/19/2010 11:57 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 10:49, David Aldrich wrote:
I have now read the cherrypicking section. I think the point to note is that
merge is to do with changes, e.g. merge in the changes made in r1823. I was
looking to bring a specific version of a file. S
Any "rough" documentation available, particularly in terms of security or
access control?
Remote "dump" makes sense -- and I assume everything being dumped is subject to
the authorization/access control restrictions that have been put into place on
the server, yes? (A particular path or file w
Dear SVN team,
With the latest 1.6.12 release (and earlier releases) a change list association
is lost when renaming a file. To demonstrate the problem perform the following
steps in an SVN working copy:
echo "Hi Mom" > SomeFileName # create a file named SomeFileName
svn add SomeFileName # add
Hello,
I've found some old posts regarding that issue but it doesn't seem it ever made
it to a development evaluation. I'd like to see new feature in Subversion that
would allow filtering files based on their properties. For example let's assume
that option name is --filter and we are working o
Hello folks,
I'm currently working on adding Python 2.7 support to Ubuntu, and am in the
process of investigating build problems with various packages. One such
package is Subversion, which appears to build just fine against Python 2.7 but
fails a handful of tests. I can see from this message
h
Hi,
There's now a new tool located in subversion/svnrdump. We have
developed it over the last few weeks, and we feel that it is mature
enough to announce. Although it has not been tested extensively, we
would like to encourage you to try it out and give us feedback so we
can improve it.
So what i
I have some corrupt revision files due to a power failure on the server.
Running svnadmin recover gives me:
Repository lock acquired.
Please wait; recovering the repository may take some time...
Recovery completed.
The latest repos revision is 37842.
But running svnadmin verify states that re
Hi
I'm merging from a branch into my project and I get the "local missing,
incoming edit upon merge" conflicts for three files.
svn status output:
MM dao/SMSBundlesCostDAO.java
! C bean/SMSFlagBean.java
> local missing, incoming edit upon merge
! C bean/PCHAutoTopUpIndBean.ja
Hey,
Ive got a problem with a specific merging operation. Im merging the
changes that have been committed in the trunk regularly into my branch to
keep it updated. However, if there are files moved from one folder to
another in the trunk, which were changed earlier in the branch, then merging
se
Hi Csaba,
Thanks for the response. Yes, I am beginning to have a good feel for
what Subversion was designed for, but I would still like to implement
something. I saw the page in the book you reference, but I cannot find any
examples on how to really implement. Any pointers anyone can provide
On Aug 19, 2010, at 10:49, David Aldrich wrote:
> I have now read the cherrypicking section. I think the point to note is that
> merge is to do with changes, e.g. merge in the changes made in r1823. I was
> looking to bring a specific version of a file. So, with merge, I would need
> to work o
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Greg Alexander wrote:
>
> Hello,
> What I am
> looking to do is to setup a way so that all files in the repository require
> a lock to be owned by the user before it can be committed the next time. I
> also want this to be an automatically set property
Hi Erik
I have now read the cherrypicking section. I think the point to note is that
merge is to do with changes, e.g. merge in the changes made in r1823. I was
looking to bring a specific version of a file. So, with merge, I would need to
work out which range of changes to apply.
BR
David
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. While I am not certain that my approach is the
best, I also know that a pre-commit hook will not suffice. What I am
looking to do is to setup a way so that all files in the repository require
a lock to be owned by the user before it can be committed the next time.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:33 PM, David Aldrich wrote:
> Hi Erik
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>
>
> Ø svn merge http://host/trunk -c -1859 .
>
>
>
> The trouble is that this will bring in all changes at r1859, not just those
> made to pegtest.txt. I realise that in my example there are no oth
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:33 PM, David Aldrich wrote:
> Hi Erik
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>
>
> Ø svn merge http://host/trunk -c -1859 .
>
svn merge http://host/trunk -c -1859 pegtest.txt
That will revert r1859 from the trunk for the specified file (it will try to
reverse merge the 1859
Hi Erik
Thanks for your reply.
Ø svn merge http://host/trunk -c -1859 .
The trouble is that this will bring in all changes at r1859, not just those
made to pegtest.txt. I realise that in my example there are no other changes
but I am looking for the general case.
Is there any other way of c
Hi
I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve.. but..
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:25 PM, David Aldrich wrote:
> Hi
>
> It has been suggested that I use peg revisions to solve this problem.
> However, I don't understand peg revision syntax.
>
> As a test, I created a new text file in the trunk cal
Hi
It has been suggested that I use peg revisions to solve this problem. However,
I don't understand peg revision syntax.
As a test, I created a new text file in the trunk called pegtest.txt and then
made changes to it:
r1855 commit pegtest.txt ver.1
r1856 commit pegtest.txt ver.2
r1857 com
On Wednesday 18 Aug 2010, Greg Alexander wrote:
> Hello,
> I am a very new Subversion user and am trying to get a post commit hook
> script working. My Subversion is running on linux. The script I want to add
> would add the needs-lock property to every file that didn't have a lock.
> Any poin
Hi
A colleague needs to modify (or create a new version) of a tag, so that he ends
up with a tag identical to the original except for a few source files that are
to be rolled back to previous versions.
I believe it's not possible to roll back the source files in the tag itself
because the tag
42 matches
Mail list logo
