On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lezz Giles [mailto:lgi...@tripadvisor.com]
> > Sent: 18 August 2010 18:14
> > To: Ryan Schmidt
> > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: copy-merge in Subversion?
> >
> > On Aug 18, 2010, at 11
Hello,
I am a very new Subversion user and am trying to get a post commit hook
script working. My Subversion is running on linux. The script I want to add
would add the needs-lock property to every file that didn't have a lock. Any
pointers on this would be great. I have searched and not fou
> -Original Message-
> From: Lezz Giles [mailto:lgi...@tripadvisor.com]
> Sent: 18 August 2010 18:14
> To: Ryan Schmidt
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: copy-merge in Subversion?
>
> On Aug 18, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2010, at 07:47, Le
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Christopher McCrory wrote:
> Hello...
>
> I wrote up a short perl program to backup a subversion repository via
> amanda ( http://www.amanda.org ). Basically it uses the amanda
> application API to call 'svnadmin dump'. It still needs a few
> enhancements, but
Hello...
I wrote up a short perl program to backup a subversion repository via
amanda ( http://www.amanda.org ). Basically it uses the amanda
application API to call 'svnadmin dump'. It still needs a few
enhancements, but it does work. I developed it on Fedora 13 where it
should "just work".
We are replicating large amounts of data along with multi-Gig file sizes
on Subversion 1.6.11 to many countries including India. What would be
the best storage solution to have Subversion on, DAS vs SAN, vs NAS?
Tami Doyen
PMC-Sierra
Resolved! thnks for all!!! Your answer very usefuly!!!
I flow:
'svn merge -r 3256:3255 svn://svn.mylocation/repositoryName/trunk'
svn commit -m 'merge 3256:3255'
Until I reached 3243!!!
Thnks!
Steven Koch
2010/8/18 Giulio Troccoli
> > > We have two servers(stagging and production), one
On Aug 18, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2010, at 07:47, Lezz Giles wrote:
>
>> Imagine the following scenario:
>>
>> - trunk has several large files (> 20M) which are updated regularly. These
>> files are +only+ changed on trunk.
>> - there are several branches, each
On 8/18/2010 8:07 AM, Steven Koch wrote:
Hi,
I need update the servers, and continue send changes to the point
3243! but actual content of SVN server are different (now r3251 is
considered new files, same that they are equals files)
If you deleted the trunk and then committed new copies of the
On Aug 18, 2010, at 07:47, Lezz Giles wrote:
> Imagine the following scenario:
>
> - trunk has several large files (> 20M) which are updated regularly. These
> files are +only+ changed on trunk.
> - there are several branches, each of which updates from trunk at least once
> a week.
>
> The
> > We have two servers(stagging and production), one
> development machine
> > and one repository SVN server separated.
Do you mean to say that the staging and production machines have a working copy
of the same SVN repository?
> > > If you have reverse-merge the offending revisions than
> your
Hi
You're not really making sense, but I would recommend that you leave your
working copy alone for now.
Make a new checkout that will get you latest in trunk.
Merge back to the revision you wanted and commit..
Now you should be back where you were before you messed up.
Then ask us for help on w
But I know'n making it!!
:(
On Aug 18, 2:07 pm, Steven Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need update the servers, and continue send changes to the point
> 3243! but actual content of SVN server are different (now r3251 is
> considered new files, same that they are equals files)
>
> We have two servers(sta
Hi,
I need update the servers, and continue send changes to the point
3243! but actual content of SVN server are different (now r3251 is
considered new files, same that they are equals files)
We have two servers(stagging and production), one development machine
and one repository SVN server sepa
Imagine the following scenario:
- trunk has several large files (> 20M) which are updated regularly. These
files are +only+ changed on trunk.
- there are several branches, each of which updates from trunk at least once a
week.
The merge of the large files from trunk takes an excessive amount o
> Thnks
>
>
> But, I can rolback the revision on my working copy (NOW my
> working copy are 3243, and the SVN 3251), but not can commit
> this 'rollback'
> to trunk! because this revision already exists on SVN Server
If you have reverse-merge the offending revisions than your working copy is at
r
Thnks
But, I can rolback the revision on my working copy (NOW my working
copy are 3243, and the SVN 3251), but not can commit this 'rollback'
to trunk! because this revision already exists on SVN Server
This causing that the servers cannot update your files, because same
files already exists and
2010/8/18 Steven Koch :
> Hi
>
> I'm in a dirt, and would like a help!
>
> I will describe the workflow of the donkey:
>
> - Copy the contents of a local branch to another folder and removed
> all references .svn this folder.
> - And later removed the contents of the trunk location, via "svn rm"
>
> Hi
>
> I'm in a dirt, and would like a help!
>
> I will describe the workflow of the donkey:
>
> - Copy the contents of a local branch to another folder and
> removed all references .svn this folder.
> - And later removed the contents of the trunk location, via "svn rm"
> and submitted via commit
Hi
I'm in a dirt, and would like a help!
I will describe the workflow of the donkey:
- Copy the contents of a local branch to another folder and removed
all references .svn this folder.
- And later removed the contents of the trunk location, via "svn rm"
and submitted via commit this change.
- C
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:38:28AM +0100, emerson wrote:
> I'm trying to run a merge with different revisions. We use a two tier
> codebase approach with trunk and a stable branch and selectively
> cherry-pick what should be merged.
This is a rather vague description of what you are doing.
If you
I'm trying to run a merge with different revisions. We use a two tier
codebase approach with trunk and a stable branch and selectively
cherry-pick what should be merged.
After merging a few revisions, I have a "Summary of conflicts: Tree
conflicts: 2" message. How can I find out which the revisio
22 matches
Mail list logo
