On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:55:20PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> No, it's harsh experience since version 1.2 (when I started helping
>> rebuild it and rebundle it for Dag's RPM repository, now RPMfoge). The
>> UNIX/Linux clients should
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 08:18:37AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> And by the way: my spelling is not usually as bad as this note was. My
> RSI is flaring up, probably my own fault.
I feel your pain, I get that, too.
Cycling regularly and the gym helps an awful lot.
You need to get your blood fl
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:55:20PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> No, it's harsh experience since version 1.2 (when I started helping
> rebuild it and rebundle it for Dag's RPM repository, now RPMfoge). The
> UNIX/Linux clients should *never* have been permitted to store
> passwords.
You forgot
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> No, it's harsh experience since version 1.2 (when I started helping
> rebuild it and rebundle it for Dag's RPM repository, now RPMfoge). The
> UNIX/Linux clients should *never* have been permitted to store
> passwords. That's a genuinel
Thanks, we are using fsfs and both server have the sam earchitecture,
os and svn version installed
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> For fsfs you should be okay.
>
> I'm not sure about bdb; if the two servers don't have the same architecture
> and
> the same BDB versions, h
No problem with URL as we will also be using the same URL when we do failover.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Cooke, Mark wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: west alto [mailto:westa...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 30 July 2010 04:23
>> To: Subversion
>> Subject: Possible corruption?
>>
>> Hi,
