On 10 June 2010 06:34, Richard England wrote:
> On 06/08/2010 01:48 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
>
> On Saturday 05 June 2010, Richard England wrote:
>
>
> Are there any possible repercussions of having two server both running
> Apache/SVN (same version) accessing the same database files? This
On 06/08/2010 01:48 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
On Saturday 05 June 2010, Richard England wrote:
Are there any possible repercussions of having two server both running
Apache/SVN (same version) accessing the same database files? This is
using FSFS.
Is this likely to cause data corruption o
Hi, I am relatively new to svn and had some questions about
maintaining branches and merging them back to the trunk.
The way my env is set up right now, ongoing development is done on the
trunk. We have branches corresponding to various releases along the
way. When needing to make a fix to an exis
Omer Faruk Sen wrote on Wed, 9 Jun 2010 at 13:51 -:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I know binary files are not processed in keyword expansion
> For example I have a binary contains $Revision$
>
> svn add mybinary
Please post the output of the above command, and of 'svn proplist -v mybinary'.
(you can
Short version: --trust-server-cert bypasses ONLY the "CA is unknown"
check; it doesn't bypass hostname and expiry checks.
Arpad Ilia wrote on Wed, 9 Jun 2010 at 15:38 -:
> Hi!
>
> Is my observation correct that this command line switch
> (--trust-server-cert) will not accept certificates wher
Hi!
This is no question. I just want to put this script into the net. Maybe it
helps others too. I found it under the same topic name and made some changes
(enhancements I would say :-)).
It helps that users enters comments and should prevent the tags folder from
changes. Sometimes someone che
Hi!
Is my observation correct that this command line switch (--trust-server-cert)
will not accept certificates where the certificate hostname does not match?
Thanks,
Arpad Ilia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 09-06-2010 14:02, Andy Levy wrote:
As far as I know binary files are not processed in keyword expansion
For example I have a binary contains $Revision$
svn add mybinary
svn propset svn:executable ON mybinary (just in case)
svn commit
After commit md5 of the binary changes. Is that normal beh
Yes exactly my point is that but it seems it doesn't work that way
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Andy Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 06:51, Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As far as I know binary files are not processed in keyword expansion
>> For example I have a binary contains $Rev
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 06:51, Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I know binary files are not processed in keyword expansion
> For example I have a binary contains $Revision$
>
> svn add mybinary
> svn propset svn:executable ON mybinary (just in case)
> svn commit
>
> After commit md5 of the
On 09-06-2010 12:51, Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
As far as I know binary files are not processed in keyword expansion
For example I have a binary contains $Revision$
svn add mybinary
svn propset svn:executable ON mybinary (just in case)
svn commit
After commit md5 of the binary changes. Is that norma
Hi,
As far as I know binary files are not processed in keyword expansion
For example I have a binary contains $Revision$
svn add mybinary
svn propset svn:executable ON mybinary (just in case)
svn commit
After commit md5 of the binary changes. Is that normal behaviour. I
use subversion-1.6.2
Reg
12 matches
Mail list logo
