Complex Apache configuration: allow anonymous read access just from a specific IP

2010-05-10 Thread Paulo Eduardo Neves
Hi, due to some strict business requirements, I need to do an overly complex subversion repository access through Apache. I won't configure it myself, so please see this is a no exit alley. Maybe there is even a simpler way to configure it. I'm integrating two repositories using the svn:external

Apache + SVN (+ LDAP) don't works

2010-05-10 Thread Saulo Soares de Toledo
Hello all! I've tried this at IRC rooms without results, then I'm here to try the list! :) I'm trying enable Apache + LDAP + SVN to enable my SVN server service. All almost done, but with this config at Apache (I have this VH only to subversion!): 1. 2. 3. ServerAdmin m...@me.

Re: Apache + SVN (+ LDAP) don't works

2010-05-10 Thread Saulo Soares de Toledo
Some more news! I changed a little and the error changed. I removed the "DocumentRoot" from configuration too. The new error is: [Mon May 10 17:12:10 2010] [error] [client 192.168.254.241] client denied by server configuration: /etc/apache2/htdocs But /etc/apache2/htdocs does not exists, and I

Re: Is there any way of extending the set of keywords recognized/expanded by Subversion?

2010-05-10 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi, On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On May 10, 2010, at 09:07, Edward Knoll wrote: > >> Not Subversion source control, but some custom SCM/bookkeeping that has been >> built around/on top of Subversion - layers application teams don't have >> direct access.  My (forlorn

Re: Is there any way of extending the set of keywords recognized/expanded by Subversion?

2010-05-10 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 10, 2010, at 09:07, Edward Knoll wrote: > Not Subversion source control, but some custom SCM/bookkeeping that has been > built around/on top of Subversion - layers application teams don't have > direct access. My (forlorn) hope is there's a way of extending the keywords, > so the appli

Re: Cannot reintegrate feature branch

2010-05-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 07:45:07PM +0800, Jean Seurin wrote: > Here's the whole thing, minus unconcerned subprojects: > > Properties on '$REPO/trunk/project/src/test/resources/log4j.properties': > svn:mergeinfo > /branches/project-1.10/src/test/resources/log4j.properties:2344-2345,2347,2349,2351

How do I determine if svn:mergeinfo is corrupt and how would I fix it.

2010-05-10 Thread Peter Kahn
I suspect I have corrupt mergeinffo but I'm not sure. Does anyone know how I'd make a determination and what resources are out there to help fix problems? Here’s the issue. My team recently moved to agile and uses feature branches (story branches really) where different teams work on the same sour

Re: Active-Active Clustering with Subversion

2010-05-10 Thread kmradke
BD wrote on 05/10/2010 09:52:39 AM: > Thats a very interesting way of looking at this problem. It does > make sense that multiple commit processes coming from the same > machine really wouldnt be that different from the question I was > asking. I guess from here I'll have to do some testing som

Re: Active-Active Clustering with Subversion

2010-05-10 Thread BD
Thanks Hyrum, Thats a very interesting way of looking at this problem. It does make sense that multiple commit processes coming from the same machine really wouldnt be that different from the question I was asking. I guess from here I'll have to do some testing somehow, with nfs in the mix and see

RE: Is there any way of extending the set of keywords recognized/expanded by Subversion?

2010-05-10 Thread Edward Knoll
Not Subversion source control, but some custom SCM/bookkeeping that has been built around/on top of Subversion - layers application teams don't have direct access. My (forlorn) hope is there's a way of extending the keywords, so the application team could reference these other bookkeeping artif

AW: Automatically merge of new binary file.

2010-05-10 Thread Walser Markus
> In that case I would recommend sending a mail to users{_AT_}tortoisesvn.tigris.org > instead of this list, as it would have to be fixed in TortoiseSVN. Hi Bert, thank you very much for your answers. As suggested I placed this issue on the tortoise list. Kind regards, Markus

RE: Automatically merge of new binary file.

2010-05-10 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Walser Markus [mailto:markuswal...@schleuniger.ch] > Sent: maandag 10 mei 2010 14:56 > To: Bert Huijben; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: AW: Automatically merge of new binary file. > > Hi Bert > > Sorry I forgot this important information: > > It was

AW: Automatically merge of new binary file.

2010-05-10 Thread Walser Markus
Hi Bert Sorry I forgot this important information: It was Tortoise 1.6.8 Build 19260 (SVN 1.6.11). Regards, Markus -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] Gesendet: Montag, 10. Mai 2010 14:53 An: Walser Markus; users@subversion.apache.org Betreff: RE: Auto

RE: Automatically merge of new binary file.

2010-05-10 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Walser Markus [mailto:markuswal...@schleuniger.ch] > Sent: maandag 10 mei 2010 14:25 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Automatically merge of new binary file. > > Hi > > Recently I ran into following subversion use case: > > 1. A new binary file

commit failed - No such file or directory

2010-05-10 Thread Vikrama Sanjeeva
Hi, 1: Did backup of live repository as below: hot-backup.py --archive-type=zip /my/svn/repo /my/svn/backup 2: Unzipped /my/svn/backup/repo-7.zip 3: checkout /my/svn/backup/repo-7 (using Tortoise) 4: On commit, am getting below error in Apache error_log ### Can't create directory

Automatically merge of new binary file.

2010-05-10 Thread Walser Markus
Hi Recently I ran into following subversion use case: 1. A new binary file was created in a working copy 1 and *not* added: e.g. C:\Test\WorkingCopy1\BinaryFile.pdf 2. In another working copy 2 of the same repo another binary file with the same filename but different content was created a

Re: Cannot reintegrate feature branch

2010-05-10 Thread Jean Seurin
Here's the whole thing, minus unconcerned subprojects: Properties on '$REPO/trunk/project/src/test/resources/log4j.properties': svn:mergeinfo /branches/project-1.10/src/test/resources/log4j.properties:2344-2345,2347,2349,2351,2361,2363,2405 /branches/project-1.13/src/test/resources/lo

Re: Cannot reintegrate feature branch

2010-05-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:08:15PM +0800, Jean Seurin wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > mergeinfo properties are exactly as I mention for the file causing problems: > > all and only the 5 files concerned with the problem have been > commited after a merge from the trunk, empty of modification, but > with t

Re: Active-Active Clustering with Subversion

2010-05-10 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:08 PM, BD wrote: > > So the question remains, taking physical restraints out of the question, is > there anyone out there who knows about managing the risks assocciated with > having two or more apache/svn nodes accessing repos that are stored on a > shared NFS storage sy

Re: generic linux binaries

2010-05-10 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Friday 07 May 2010, Arpad Ilia wrote: > Is there somewhere a generic linux binary distribution of subversion? One > that just needs to be unpacked and needs no root privileges on a debian > system. No, Subversion is still compiled to CPU-specific code, so there can not be generic binaries. Tha

RE: Tigris binary packages for Windows

2010-05-10 Thread Cooke, Mark
> > -Original Message- > > From: David Darj [mailto:z...@alagazam.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2010 6:26 AM > > To: Cooke, Mark > > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; Troy Simpson > > Subject: Re: Tigris binary packages for Windows > > > > On 2010-04-26 13:58, Cooke, Mark wrote: > > > Hi