Re: Regarding shallow checkouts

2010-02-22 Thread An Me
Hi All, Thank you all for the response. Regards, An On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Ryan Schmidt < subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> wrote: > > On Feb 22, 2010, at 22:48, An Me wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > > > >> You need to change only one file. You co em

Re: Regarding shallow checkouts

2010-02-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 22, 2010, at 22:48, An Me wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > >> You need to change only one file. You co empty top-level directory, then >> update only that file. And edit and commit it. > > But usually if we are working on java project,to edit some files mea

Re: Regarding shallow checkouts

2010-02-22 Thread An Me
Hi Thanks for the reply. But usually if we are working on java project,to edit some files mean we need to co the whole project and not that single file alone for editing as we need to check whether the whole project is working fine by finally compiling and running the same.So where exactly is the

Re: A question about hook

2010-02-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 22, 2010, at 18:56, hu.mi...@zte.com.cn wrote: > hi,I want to catch the client ip in svn hook.How to do! Thanks. As far as I know, the client IP address is not available to the hook script. If you are serving with Apache, the client IP will be in the Apache log; you may be able to mak

A question about hook

2010-02-22 Thread hu . miao1
hi,I want to catch the client ip in svn hook.How to do! Thanks. ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipien

new repo organization and merging advice needed

2010-02-22 Thread Mark Branson
I'm setting up a new SVN repository with some colleagues and wanted to get some expert feedback on how to best organize it as well as some ideas for merging strategies. First off I should say that I'm a beginner/intermediate SVN user for a different and much smaller project, so I'm just gettin

RE: Automated Merging

2010-02-22 Thread Thomas Loy
Although I can't speak for the poster, this looks to be commercial software. A look at the parent website shows another build product for $1995 per server. Could be a useful tool, but since it isn't open source I doubt we'll take a close look at it since Build Engineering is at the bottom of t

RE: SVN 1.6.x - Merge using sparse checkout resulting in tree conflicts

2010-02-22 Thread Srinivas Kotla
Hi Stefan, Thank you for you response. Yes, I would be advising our developers to revert such changes after examining them. But this seems to be a bug in the sense that tree conflicts are not differentiating the missing-due-to-sparse-checkout with missing-due-to-deletion. And just to give a

Re: SVN 1.6.x - Merge using sparse checkout resulting in tree conflicts

2010-02-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:38:47PM -0800, Srinivas Kotla wrote: > Hi, > > Did anyone run into issues with merge resulting in tree conflicts when > using sparse checkouts? > > Some directories that were not checkedout in the working copy were > marked as tree conflicts after the merge (local delet

SVN 1.6.x - Merge using sparse checkout resulting in tree conflicts

2010-02-22 Thread Srinivas Kotla
Hi, Did anyone run into issues with merge resulting in tree conflicts when using sparse checkouts? Some directories that were not checkedout in the working copy were marked as tree conflicts after the merge (local delete, incoming edit upon merge). Thanks, Srinivas Kotla | Configuration Manage

Re: Automated Merging

2010-02-22 Thread Pat Farrell
k...@timpanisoftware.com wrote: > look at it, please check out the web site http://www.mergemagician.com. > If you'd like to download it, shoot me an e-mail and I'll send you the > download link. The website has some critical information missing. Before I look futher: What license do you expect

Automated Merging

2010-02-22 Thread kd1
Hi All, For the last several months I've been working on a new project ... an automated merging and branch management solutions designed for teams that utilizing branches in their Subversion repositories. MergeMagician makes it much easier to manage multiple branches and keep them in sync by a

Re: Beginner admin question: organizing repository for student projects

2010-02-22 Thread David Weintraub
First of all, I'd like to congratulate you about getting your students use to version control. When I went to college, I was taught how to program, but never learned about the various tools used in the process. We did C programming and never use Makefiles. My son learned Java, but never used Ant or

Re: Will upgrade from 1.6 to 1.7 benifit from dump/reload?

2010-02-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, 22 Feb 2010 at 14:28 +0100: > That same document currently does not describe any differences between > format 4 (SVN 1.6) and format 5 (SVN 1.7) in the section "Filesystem > formats". That's a bug. > Which is kind of odd (why bump the filesystem format if > there are

Beginner admin question: organizing repository for student projects

2010-02-22 Thread Stephen Bloch
I want to get my undergraduate students in the habit of using svn, both for individual projects and for group projects. I'd like to be able to create projects that belong to a whole class, and to an arbitrary subset of students, and to an individual student. And I'd like to be able to set

Re: Will upgrade from 1.6 to 1.7 benifit from dump/reload?

2010-02-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Neels J Hofmeyr wrote on Mon, 22 Feb 2010 at 18:37 +0100: > About SHA1 on the 1.6 server: the point really is that we need to > communicate those SHA1 checksums to the client and back. Those API Communicate to the client? Eh? If those are the same checksums that go into the rev file, I'd hope th

Automated Merging

2010-02-22 Thread kd1
Hi All, For the last several months I've been working on a new project ... an automated merging and branch management solutions designed for teams that utilizing branches in their Subversion repositories. MergeMagician makes it much easier to manage multiple branches and keep them in sync by a

Re: Strange output from reintegrate merge using JavaHL

2010-02-22 Thread Mark Phippard
JavaHL itself does not output anything. It just sends notifications and the code using JavaHL (svnClientAdapter in this case) turns it into something. Your output means that a notification came out of SVN that the svnClientAdapter code did not have code to handle. The best thing would be to put

Re: Will upgrade from 1.6 to 1.7 benifit from dump/reload?

2010-02-22 Thread Neels J Hofmeyr
Sorry if I picked the wrong list there confusing Johan, but IMHO it *is* a users@ question. It is not about *writing* the API or code, it is about *using* the API/binaries, be it a future API or not. I agree that it's sort of in-between. What drove me to redirect to users@ is that others that read

Re: regression: commiting a property change fails on windows, when working copy is on a samba share

2010-02-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:50:21PM +0100, Attila Kinali wrote: > --- > Commit > Y:\work\scilab > Commit succeeded, but other errors follow: > Error bumping revisions post-commit (details follow): > In directory 'Y:\work\scilab' > Error processing command 'committed' in 'Y:\work\scilab' > Can't move

Re: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:49:15AM +, David Aldrich wrote: > Hi Stefan > > > I've added a new section to the book explaining how to keep > > a branch alive after reintegration. > > Thanks very much for adding this new section. This method may well be > useful to us. Currently, we are running

Re: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-22 Thread Tyler Roscoe
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:49:15AM +, David Aldrich wrote: > Currently, we are running svn client 1.6.9 against svn server 1.5.2. > Will this combination support the "svn merge --record-only" method > that you described? Yes. tyler

Re: merge doesn't merge changes - bug, but in which version?

2010-02-22 Thread Chris Withers
Chris Withers wrote: Chris Withers wrote: - svn co https://secure.simplistix.co.uk/svn/Simplistix/testfixtures/branches/1.8 - svn merge -r 4195:HEAD https://secure.simplistix.co.uk/svn/Simplistix/testfixtures/trunk . Except this merges no changes :-( Okay, so the server runs svn as suppli

Re: Regarding shallow checkouts

2010-02-22 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, An Me! > I am learning svn and am a new-bie.The following is my doubt. > What is the significance of shallow checkouts.?. > Why would somebody want to checkout a project partially.? > If possible please explain with a scenario/real life example. If by shallow checkout you mean fetchin

Re: Collect only the files changed

2010-02-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 22, 2010, at 08:58, Manickavel, Senthil wrote: > Is there a way to collect only the files changed between 2 revisions? > (without the directories) > > svn diff --summarize -r$FROM_REV:$TO_REV $URL_BASE "svn diff --summarize" shows you the names of the files that changed. You'll then ha

Collect only the files changed

2010-02-22 Thread Manickavel, Senthil
Hi, Is there a way to collect only the files changed between 2 revisions? (without the directories) svn diff --summarize -r$FROM_REV:$TO_REV $URL_BASE With Regards, Senthil The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The mes

regression: commiting a property change fails on windows, when working copy is on a samba share

2010-02-22 Thread Attila Kinali
Hi, System: Windows XP svn 1.6.9 (collab) tortoise 1.6.7, build 18415 We upgraded two weeks ago from svn 1.5.9 to 1.6.9. Everything done here worked fine with 1.5.9. When the working copy is on a samba(3.2.5 debian/stable) share, editing and commiting a property fails with this error message: -

Re: svn switch does not update relative externals

2010-02-22 Thread Olivier Sannier
Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Olivier Sannier wrote: I reread the svn book and it is not clear to me whether or not svn switch is supposed to update a relative external. To me it would be quite logical that it would, hence my surprise when I saw the above behavior.

Re: svn switch does not update relative externals

2010-02-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Olivier Sannier wrote: > Hello all, > > Let's say we have the following repository: > > /trunk > /trunk/bin > /trunk/sources/report_engine/models > > and an external on bin defined as the following: > > ../sources/report_engine/models models > > so when I checkout

svn switch does not update relative externals

2010-02-22 Thread Olivier Sannier
Hello all, Let's say we have the following repository: /trunk /trunk/bin /trunk/sources/report_engine/models and an external on bin defined as the following: ../sources/report_engine/models models so when I checkout trunk, I get a copy of /trunk/sources/report_engine/models inside the bin/mo

Re: Regarding shallow checkouts

2010-02-22 Thread Felix Gilcher
Well, my scenario is simple: I have a repository that contains a folder branches and in that folder is a branch for every version that is deployed. Deployment is done every second week, since 2007. So that's a lot of branches. I use shallow checkout to check out the branches folder and all of it

log shows unintended object's history even with a peg

2010-02-22 Thread Rob Hubbard
Hello, I have a project that happens to have two separate objects with the same path. SVN seems to make it difficult to view the history of objects other than those present at the HEAD, unless you already know certain key historical revision numbers. [I have tried this with SVN 1.6.6 and SlikSVN

Re: Will upgrade from 1.6 to 1.7 benifit from dump/reload?

2010-02-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > (This mail was posted to dev@ -- redirecting to users@) > > Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> Hi devs, >> >> A small question in anticipation of 1.7: will an (FSFS) repo benifit >> from a dump/reload when upgrading from 1.6 to 1.7? Or will a simple

Re: Will upgrade from 1.6 to 1.7 benifit from dump/reload?

2010-02-22 Thread Neels J Hofmeyr
(This mail was posted to dev@ -- redirecting to users@) Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Hi devs, > > A small question in anticipation of 1.7: will an (FSFS) repo benifit > from a dump/reload when upgrading from 1.6 to 1.7? Or will a simple > "upgrade" (followed maybe by a "pack" to pack the revprops) pr

Passwords stored in gnome-keyring lack a description

2010-02-22 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
(Please CC me, I am not on the list) Hi, it seems any network passwords that are stored by subversion in the gnome-keyring do not get any description. In my gnome-keyring-manager they just show up as "network password", which is of course very uninformative. Looking at the code, it seems gnome_ke

Attachments

2010-02-22 Thread Rob Hubbard
Hello, What are the options for posting questions with attachments to this mailing please? Specifically: (1) are attachments possible? (2) if so, what file types are permitted (especially zips, scripts, images)? (3) presumably, any attachments should be small, but is there a specific size limit?

RE: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-22 Thread David Aldrich
Hi Stefan > I've added a new section to the book explaining how to keep > a branch alive after reintegration. Thanks very much for adding this new section. This method may well be useful to us. Currently, we are running svn client 1.6.9 against svn server 1.5.2. Will this combination support t

Regarding shallow checkouts

2010-02-22 Thread An Me
Hi All, I am learning svn and am a new-bie.The following is my doubt. What is the significance of shallow checkouts.?. Why would somebody want to checkout a project partially.? If possible please explain with a scenario/real life example. Regards, An