> On Thu, 2009-12-17, Alan Spencer wrote:
>> I've been asked to analyse a problem we have had with subversion and
>> come to the conclusion there is a bug in at least the client.
>>
>>
>> The scenario was someone committed a new directory that made a build
>> fail and in order to free up the bu
I have built subversion rpm files from the subversion source codes directly
in my rhel 5 server.
I tried to install all the rpm files created during the build process. The
following files have been installed successfully .
mod_dav_svn-1.6.5-1.i386.rpm
subversion-debuginfo-1.6.5-1.i386.rpm
subvers
2010/1/24 Johan Hogdahl :
> Hello.
> I'm new to subversion after using CVS and RCS for a long time.
> I have just done a conversion of our code base to subversion.
> Now i got into a problem, the propset keywords Date fills in the Date in a
> complete other way then
> CVS did. And cause many of our
On Jan 24, 2010, at 07:54, Johan Hogdahl wrote:
> Hello.
> I'm new to subversion after using CVS and RCS for a long time.
> I have just done a conversion of our code base to subversion.
> Now i got into a problem, the propset keywords Date fills in the Date in a
> complete other way then
> CVS d
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> It seems quite obvious that the existing .spec files from
>> packages/rpms/rhel-*/ directories have not been used in years. They
>> represent a considerable amount of work by Dav
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> It seems quite obvious that the existing .spec files from
> packages/rpms/rhel-*/ directories have not been used in years. They
> represent a considerable amount of work by David Sommers and other
> contributors (perhaps including a few
It seems quite obvious that the existing .spec files from
packages/rpms/rhel-*/ directories have not been used in years. They
represent a considerable amount of work by David Sommers and other
contributors (perhaps including a few patches from me?), but
definitely need update. The contemporary vers
Hello.
I'm new to subversion after using CVS and RCS for a long time.
I have just done a conversion of our code base to subversion.
Now i got into a problem, the propset keywords Date fills in the Date in
a complete other way then
CVS did. And cause many of our development machines is configured
I've sent the dumpfile to Lieven off list.
--
troels
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:57 PM, troels knak-nielsen
> wrote:
>> Hi list.
>>
>> I've just installed svn from ports on FreeBSD. It works for some
>> operations, but I get a coredump
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The error shows that you are using ra_serf for http:// access.
> You should try ra_neon instead, ra_serf is experimental.
>
> Put the line:
>
> http-library = neon
>
> into ~/.subversion/servers and the problem will likely
> disappear even
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:57 PM, troels knak-nielsen
wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> I've just installed svn from ports on FreeBSD. It works for some
> operations, but I get a coredump when running the following:
>
> # svn export http://svn.facebook.com/svnroot/platform/clients/php/trunk
> facebook-api
> s
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:24:20AM +0100, troels knak-nielsen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
> > I cannot reproduce this using the recently released Subversion 1.6.9.
> >
> > -Hyrum
>
> So - Is it likely that I can remedy the issue by compiling from a
> source
12 matches
Mail list logo
