Re: riscv target spec for newlib and rtems

2024-01-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023, 9:45 AM Matt Wette wrote: > The build from git master worked (but first try I ran out of disk space: > needs > 10 G for the build. > That's good news that it built. We need to check the Users Guide to see if it has disk space recommendations. Did you see any? Personally,

Re: riscv target spec for newlib and rtems

2024-01-10 Thread Chris Johns
On 30/12/2023 1:05 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Chris... I thought the RSB was ok for Python 3 for RTEMS 5? Is it just on the > branch?  Sorry I am not sure what the status is. > Matt..can you try the tip of the 5 branch? Looking at the log, I see commit > messages about Python 3. This is the way

Re: riscv target spec for newlib and rtems

2023-12-28 Thread Matt Wette
The v5 source-builder does not work on python3 machines and current RTEMS release is 5.2 (or 5.1 if you go to www.rtems.org.   I did find v6.1-rc1  by guessing the path based on the 5.1 release path. I decided to take a shot at building on my own.   I've done this sort of thing before (e.g., bu

Re: riscv target spec for newlib and rtems

2023-12-27 Thread Joel Sherrill
Sounds like you are trying to do this by hand. The RTEMS Source Builder (RSB) is the recommended way to build tools. See https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/index.html for detailed instructions on the required packages on your host and how to use the RSB. The RSB fetches, patches, and buil

riscv target spec for newlib and rtems

2023-12-27 Thread Matt Wette
Hi All, I'm working on compiling binutils, gcc, newlib and rtems-5.3 for RISC-V.   What is appropriate target-spec? I've searched for specification hints but can't anything. Currently, I'm using riscv-rtems-elf but it seems newlib and rtems want to see a target spec with four fields and rtems i