Re: Stack_check_Dump_threads_usage printing out the wrong values

2017-11-16 Thread Chris Johns
On 17/11/2017 15:27, gro...@chichak.ca wrote: > I fear blowing up builds all over the world, but I’ll give it a try. Fantastic. Looking forward to the fireworks. Chris ___ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: Stack_check_Dump_threads_usage printing out the wrong values

2017-11-16 Thread groups
I fear blowing up builds all over the world, but I’ll give it a try. A > On 2017-November-16, at 21:21, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 17/11/2017 15:05, gro...@chichak.ca wrote: >> >> (I don’t know how to proceed with getting this reported/fixed.) >> > > Please head to the wiki (https://devel.rte

Re: Stack_check_Dump_threads_usage printing out the wrong values

2017-11-16 Thread Chris Johns
On 17/11/2017 15:05, gro...@chichak.ca wrote: > > (I don’t know how to proceed with getting this reported/fixed.) > Please head to the wiki (https://devel.rtems.org/) and select the link in the "Reporting a bug" column of the Releases Table for the release you are reporting the bug against. You

Re: Stack_check_Dump_threads_usage printing out the wrong values

2017-11-16 Thread groups
> On 2017-November-15, at 16:10, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 16/11/2017 09:50, Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: >> I’m working with 4.12 for ARM (cortex M7) >> >> I’m tracing down an issue and figured it smelled like a stack problem, so I >> got >> my command line interpreter to call rtems_stack_che

Re: Stack_check_Dump_threads_usage printing out the wrong values

2017-11-15 Thread Chris Johns
On 16/11/2017 09:50, Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: > I’m working with 4.12 for ARM (cortex M7) > > I’m tracing down an issue and figured it smelled like a stack problem, so I > got > my command line interpreter to call rtems_stack_checker_report_usage(). > > The addresses that it is printing out a

Stack_check_Dump_threads_usage printing out the wrong values

2017-11-15 Thread Mr. Andrei Chichak
I’m working with 4.12 for ARM (cortex M7) I’m tracing down an issue and figured it smelled like a stack problem, so I got my command line interpreter to call rtems_stack_checker_report_usage(). The addresses that it is printing out are just wrong. STACK USAGE BY T