ss
>>
>> bin.w...@qkmtech.com
>>
>>
>> From: bin.w...@qkmtech.com
>> Date: 2017-12-29 09:25
>> To: Chris Johns; Users
>> Subject: Re: Re: the difference between posix user and c user
>> i google the posix .now
option
> was provided historically as a way to avoid compiling the POSIX
> library into an application, but modern compilers are able to remove
> the unused code any way.
>
>>
>> bin.w...@qkmtech.com
>>
>>
>> From: bin.w...@qkmte
hen ,the compiler will not
use the unused code .
thanks
bin.w...@qkmtech.com
From: Gedare Bloom
Date: 2018-01-11 00:50
To: bin.w...@qkmtech.com
CC: Chris Johns; Users
Subject: Re: Re: the difference between posix user and c user
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:35 PM, bin.w...@qkmtech.com
wrote:
> is the
ech.com
> Date: 2017-12-29 09:25
> To: Chris Johns; Users
> Subject: Re: Re: the difference between posix user and c user
> i google the posix .now i know that posix is the abbreviation of "the
> Portable Operating System Interface" it is for software compatibility with
>
Subject: Re: Re: the difference between posix user and c user
i google the posix .now i know that posix is the abbreviation of "the Portable
Operating System Interface" it is for software compatibility with variants of
Unix and other operating systems
but you said, "POSIX and the Class
i google the posix .now i know that posix is the abbreviation of "the Portable
Operating System Interface" it is for software compatibility with variants of
Unix and other operating systems
but you said, "POSIX and the Classic API are both C APIs."
than i think the posix is packaged on the basis
