Hi Matthew,
Sounds good. I will try to report if we make any progress on my end. We
intend to apply it to some additional code (EPICS) so that might give some
insights into the process that users might need for their applications.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:11 AM Matthew J Fletcher wrote:
> Hi G
Hi Gedare,
I suspect that the Coverty analysis of RTEMS is more mature than the
GCC11 -fanalyzer at this stage, i was actually thinking of the
possibilities that an integrated GCC option adds to RTEMS based, but closed
source applications (such as ours), where other static options
like Coverty and
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 6:15 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021, 6:49 AM Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>> Hello Matthew,
>>
>> On 29/01/2021 10:14, Matthew J Fletcher wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Does RTEMS trunk roughly follow GCC releases ?,. i've
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021, 6:49 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Matthew,
>
> On 29/01/2021 10:14, Matthew J Fletcher wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does RTEMS trunk roughly follow GCC releases ?,. i've seen discussion
> > of GCC 11 on the dev mailing list.
> you can alre
Hello Matthew,
On 29/01/2021 10:14, Matthew J Fletcher wrote:
Hi,
Does RTEMS trunk roughly follow GCC releases ?,. i've seen discussion
of GCC 11 on the dev mailing list.
you can already try out the GCC 11 based tools with the experimental
RTEMS 7 tool chain available in the RSB.
I wonder i
