On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Mathew Benson
wrote:
> I like this idea. I signed up for the mailing list. I'll try to submit
> something in the next few days. Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>> - Am 12. Jul 20
I like this idea. I signed up for the mailing list. I'll try to submit
something in the next few days. Thanks.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> - Am 12. Jul 2018 um 19:48 schrieb Mathew Benson
> mathew.ben...@gmail.com:
>
> >
- Am 12. Jul 2018 um 19:48 schrieb Mathew Benson mathew.ben...@gmail.com:
> I assume symbols prefixed with "_" are to be considered part of the private
> API. What are the guidelines and legalities, if any, of bringing in these
> private symbols into our own code?
Functions, variables, and s
; uint64_t cpuUsageInUs =
> (_Timestamp_Get_seconds(&timeRan) * *static_cast*(100)) +
> (_Timestamp_Get_nanoseconds(&timeRan) / *static_cast*(1000));
>
>
>
>
> *return* cpuUsageInUs;
>
>
> }
>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Mathew Benson
wrote:
> What would be the recommend way to read CPU utilization? Am I correct in
> saying, the best way would be to call rtems_cpu_usage_report_with_plugin()?
> Its ill advised to access the private symbols utilized by the
> rtems_cpu_usage_report_