Is the plan proposed here going to preclude "long double" type implementations
in RTEMS 5.1?
What happens to backward-compatibility?
Thank you,
Noble
-Original Message-
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Michael Davidsaver
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 11
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:34 AM Nkwocha, Noble N. (IVV-1800) <
noble.n.nkwo...@nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> Is the plan proposed here going to preclude "long double" type
> implementations in RTEMS 5.1?
>
On some architectures, the hardware really supports 128-bit floating point.
For those, newlib
curre
