RealView PBX A9.
Best Regards,
JunBeom
From: JunBeom Kim (EmbedCoreTech)
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 2:24 PM
To: 'j...@rtems.org'
Cc: '구철회' ; 'rtems-us...@rtems.org'
Subject: RE: RTEMS POSIX Priority Inversion Issue.
Dear Joel,
Thank you for
>
>
>
> Have a good weekend and Happy new year.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> JunBeom
>
>
>
> *From:* Joel Sherrill
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 29, 2018 1:46 AM
> *To:* JunBeom Kim (EmbedCoreTech)
> *Cc:* 구철회 ; rtems-us...@rtems.org
> *Subject:* Re:
: JunBeom Kim (EmbedCoreTech)
Cc: 구철회 ; rtems-us...@rtems.org
Subject: Re: RTEMS POSIX Priority Inversion Issue.
Hi
I'm off for the holidays and answering from my phone. My suspicion is that the
pthread command is an alias for the tasks command. Thus it is not reporting the
priority fro
simple example
> code.
>
> Qt Thread API is calling RTEMS POSIX API.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> JunBeom
>
>
>
> *From:* ch...@kari.re.kr
> *Sent:* Friday, December 28, 2018 4:05 PM
> *To:* JunBeom Kim (EmbedCoreTech)
> *Cc:* users@rtems.org
> *Subject:*
Kim (EmbedCoreTech)
Cc: users@rtems.org
Subject: RE: RTEMS POSIX Priority Inversion Issue.
What is the relation between main thread and pthread1/2/3?
If the main thread has a control to wake up each pthread1/2/3, it gonna be in
trouble when the prioirty of the main thread is lower than
threads.
However why do you assign so much long integer value to priority?
Cheol
- 원본 메일 -
보낸사람 : "JunBeom Kim (EmbedCoreTech)"
받는사람 :
받은날짜 : 2018-12-28 (금) 15:45:48
제목 : RTEMS POSIX Priority Inversion Issue.
Dear Sir, I am testing RTEMS POSIX thread priority. I am s
Dear Sir,
I am testing RTEMS POSIX thread priority.
I am still using RTEMS 4.12 in 2017 year.
There are four pthreads(main, pthread1, pthread2, pthread3) on two cores in
my test case.
- main pthread is running on core 1.
- pthread1, pthread2, pthread3 is running on core 2.
- All threads
