Re: Issue with mbuf de-allocation when using NFS in RTEMS

2017-11-02 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 02/11/17 02:28, Ben Dart wrote: We are not sure why we get the RPC, Cant decode result, but this is not necessarily the bad behavior. When this happens we notice that the number of MBUFS available reduces and doesn’t come back. Over a period of 1-2 days eventually we run out of MBUFS and can

Re: Issue with mbuf de-allocation when using NFS in RTEMS

2017-11-02 Thread Chris Johns
On 03/11/2017 10:25, Ben Dart wrote: > PowerPC 5200 BSP, but the mbuf management comes from libnetworking in the > cpukit, I thought this was not related to the BSP? The management of the buffers is in libnetworking as you point out however the network driver is either shared and located in libc

RE: Issue with mbuf de-allocation when using NFS in RTEMS

2017-11-02 Thread Ben Dart
mbuf de-allocation when using NFS in RTEMS On 03/11/2017 06:46, Ben Dart wrote: > > We tried the patch, it still prints RPC, cant decode etc. How can we check > for issues in the network stack driver? Is there a debug print pre-processor > that I can turn on that would give m

Re: Issue with mbuf de-allocation when using NFS in RTEMS

2017-11-02 Thread Chris Johns
On 03/11/2017 06:46, Ben Dart wrote: > > We tried the patch, it still prints RPC, cant decode etc. How can we check > for issues in the network stack driver? Is there a debug print pre-processor > that I can turn on that would give me more clues? > Sorry, I do not know what BSP or driver you a

RE: Issue with mbuf de-allocation when using NFS in RTEMS

2017-11-02 Thread Ben Dart
: Thursday, November 02, 2017 8:05 PM To: Ben Dart; users@rtems.org Subject: Re: Issue with mbuf de-allocation when using NFS in RTEMS On 2/11/17 1:48 pm, Ben Dart wrote: > I did see this patch, it looks like it is to do with fixing the issue > with the RPC cant decode. We will see if it fixe

Re: Issue with mbuf de-allocation when using NFS in RTEMS

2017-11-02 Thread Chris Johns
On 2/11/17 1:48 pm, Ben Dart wrote: > I did see this patch, it looks like it is to do with fixing the issue with > the RPC cant decode. We will see if it fixes this, Good to know. > but why would the MBUF count go down due to this? Have you seen anything that > would indicate a reason for the

RE: Issue with mbuf de-allocation when using NFS in RTEMS

2017-11-01 Thread Ben Dart
Message- From: Chris Johns [mailto:chr...@rtems.org] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2017 11:57 AM To: Ben Dart; users@rtems.org Subject: Re: Issue with mbuf de-allocation when using NFS in RTEMS On 02/11/2017 12:28, Ben Dart wrote: > But still, eventually, we run out of MBUFS and the system

Re: Issue with mbuf de-allocation when using NFS in RTEMS

2017-11-01 Thread Chris Johns
On 02/11/2017 12:28, Ben Dart wrote: > But still, eventually, we run out of MBUFS and the system is inoperable. We > are > running an old version of RTEMS (4.9.2) but even compared to the newer version > 4.11 we can see any significant changes in this or the NFS related files that > would suggest