-30 12:53, Sebastian Huber escribió:
On 30/11/2018 11:55, Arturo Perez Garcia wrote:
Hello, thanks for the feedback. I checked the confdefs file and the
macro CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_SEMAPHORES is set to 0 by default. I don't
know why I didn't get those errors.
I used the RTEMS master to ru
tian Huber escribió:
Hello,
On 30/11/2018 11:24, Arturo Perez Garcia wrote:
Here are the source files. I created a README file explaining the
intended goal of the semaphore under text. Under this context, I
developed the test. I also put the output obtained.
I hope these tests help you to fin
30 09:56, Sebastian Huber escribió:
On 30/11/2018 09:50, Arturo Perez Garcia wrote:
I reproduced the problem in a simple test. And I run it in the
zedboard and in the zcu102 obtaining the same results.
Where/how can I deliver it??
This is great, can you attach the test sources to an e-mail to
I reproduced the problem in a simple test. And I run it in the zedboard
and in the zcu102 obtaining the same results.
Where/how can I deliver it??
Thanks
El 2018-11-28 19:13, Sebastian Huber escribió:
- Am 28. Nov 2018 um 17:00 schrieb Arturo Perez Garcia
arturo.pe...@upm.es:
I didn&#
hore and
cache memories (Sebastian Huber)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:58:11 +0100
From: Sebastian Huber
To: Arturo Perez Garcia
Cc: users@rtems.org
Subject: Re: Task sync problems related with binary semapho
Yes, I'm checking the return status always. When I create the RTEMS
objects and when I acquire/release the semaphore. I removed those checks
from the code I put in the previous message.
Thanks.
El 2018-11-28 11:42, Sebastian Huber escribió:
On 28/11/2018 11:30, Arturo Perez Garcia
't know how to test it.
Thanks.
El 2018-11-28 11:18, Arturo Perez Garcia escribió:
RTEMS is running in the R5 processors in lockstep mode, hence it is
not an SMP configuration.
Thanks.
El 2018-11-27 14:45, Sebastian Huber escribió:
On 27/11/2018 13:23, Arturo Perez Garcia wrote:
Hi
RTEMS is running in the R5 processors in lockstep mode, hence it is not
an SMP configuration.
Thanks.
El 2018-11-27 14:45, Sebastian Huber escribió:
On 27/11/2018 13:23, Arturo Perez Garcia wrote:
Hi, I have been facing thread synchronization problems.
I was trying to synchronize two
lated to a wrong implementation of the BSP??
Thanks in advance.
--
Arturo Perez Garcia - arturo.pe...@upm.es
Researcher
Center of Industrial Electronics
Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
___
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/ma
mind?
-Can be the BSP added to the last RTEMS release? Or, must it be adapted
to the development branch?
-Which is the revision procedure that must be done to validate the BSP?
-Third-party sources are actually included in the BSP? Is this a
problem?
--
Arturo Perez Garcia - arturo.pe...@u
t the BSP of the zynq is the best reference. But, do you
know if there is another good bsp reference.
Regards
--
ARTURO PEREZ GARCIA
Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
___
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
11 matches
Mail list logo
