On 12/10/2018 11:57, Thawra Kadeed wrote:
On 2018-10-12 07:49, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 11/10/2018 17:32, Thawra Kadeed wrote:
Thanks a lot Sebastian for your answer.
Actually, we are planning to run a multi-core system using a
network-on-chip and network interfaces as a physical interconnec
On 12/10/2018 10:40, Catalin Demergian wrote:
Hi,
I still think it would be worth to try the latest RTEMS master just to
make sure we don't search a bug which is already fixed. Also RTEMS 5 has
more assertions in the debug configuration.
-> is RTEMS 5 stable branch or development ?
It is the de
Hi,
I still think it would be worth to try the latest RTEMS master just to
make sure we don't search a bug which is already fixed. Also RTEMS 5 has
more assertions in the debug configuration.
-> is RTEMS 5 stable branch or development ?
-> what is the link for RTEMS master (where to do a git clone
On 11/10/2018 15:37, Catalin Demergian wrote:
Hi,
Yes, there is a call to rtems_task_wake_after in the code; but in that
case state should have been STATES_DELAYING, right ?
The
state = 0x0 = STATES_READY
Wait.flags = 0x02 = THREAD_WAIT_STATE_BLOCKED
looks suspicious. It should be
state = 0
