Hello Cliff,
please note that this wasn't the only bug that has been fixed over the
last year in the fat file system:
https://git.rtems.org/rtems/log/cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs
Regards
Christian
Am 05.10.18 um 18:59 schrieb Cliff Geschke:
> It turns out that this bug was fixed last year
>
>
>
It turns out that this bug was fixed last year
authorSebastian Huber 2017-09-06 12:30:00 (UTC)
committer Sebastian Huber 2017-09-06 12:40:38 (UTC)
dosfs: Fix fat_file_update()
Do not update the non-existant meta-data of the root directory.
Cl
Hi,
First of all, I verified if I have this fix in my code base and I do have
it.
"Are the flags == 0x101? In this case the thread is in the middle of
_Event_Seize()"
Yes. Even if in my test the ping packets arrive once at every second
and there is plenty of time, sometimes it
happens that rtems
On 04/10/2018 15:33, Catalin Demergian wrote:
I eliminated the theory of memory corruption. I debugged and found we
set Wait.flags = 0x104 with a function call.
The USB interrupt can arrive at any time, so Wait.flags can be either
INTEND_TO_BLOCK, BLOCKED or READY_AGAIN.
Following the logic
