On Thu, Jul 12, 2018, 5:51 PM Russell Haley wrote:
> While this is maybe not a currently viable alternative, it's most likely
> port-able (meaning could be ported) to work with libbsd?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHFS
>
> For what it's worth
>
It's worth something. :)
It came up before an
While this is maybe not a currently viable alternative, it's most likely
port-able (meaning could be ported) to work with libbsd?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHFS
For what it's worth,
Russ
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello,
Hello,
for NAND flashes you can use YAFFS2:
https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems-yaffs2.git/
You need a license for commercial products:
https://yaffs.net/yaffs-licence-faqs
___
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/us
Does JFFS2 provide bad block management and wear leveling? If so, is there
anything we need to do to enable it?
Sent from my iPhone
___
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I like this idea. I signed up for the mailing list. I'll try to submit
something in the next few days. Thanks.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> - Am 12. Jul 2018 um 19:48 schrieb Mathew Benson
> mathew.ben...@gmail.com:
>
> >
- Am 12. Jul 2018 um 19:48 schrieb Mathew Benson mathew.ben...@gmail.com:
> I assume symbols prefixed with "_" are to be considered part of the private
> API. What are the guidelines and legalities, if any, of bringing in these
> private symbols into our own code?
Functions, variables, and s
I assume symbols prefixed with "_" are to be considered part of the private
API. What are the guidelines and legalities, if any, of bringing in these
private symbols into our own code?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Fabrício de Novaes Kucinskis <
fabricio.kucins...@inpe.br> wrote:
> Hi Mathew
Hi Mathew and Joel,
On the past, I’ve used the following code to get individual task usage and
monitor tasks behavior through time. It’s completely based on
rtems_cpu_usage_report_with_plugin and I know it’s not the best way to do it,
but worked for me 😊.
Regards,
Fabrício.
/**
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Mathew Benson
wrote:
> What would be the recommend way to read CPU utilization? Am I correct in
> saying, the best way would be to call rtems_cpu_usage_report_with_plugin()?
> Its ill advised to access the private symbols utilized by the
> rtems_cpu_usage_report_
