On 22/12/17 11:06 am, Till Straumann wrote:
> On 12/21/2017 05:18 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
>> I am missing the reason why the list is important to cexp? Are symbols not
>> enough? Sorry to be asking rather basic questions.
> Sure, symbols are enough - however, cexp keeps its own symbol table(s)
> wit
On 23/12/17 3:45 am, Till Straumann wrote:
> FWIW - I had (a while ago) created the pmelf library (which is distributed
> with
> cexpsh but can be unbundled).
>
> The primary goals were:
> - independent licensing
> - only read pieces of a file which are actually needed. Most ELF libraries I
> k
On 22/12/17 5:07 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote> At least at the moment all RTEMS
targets use ELF. I removed all non-ELF support
> in Binutils for obsolete RTEMS targets in January 2017.
Sure, but I am not sure how this relates to the discussion.
> It would be nice to have the ELF headers in RTEMS (or
On 12/22/2017 12:07 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 22/12/17 00:18, Chris Johns wrote:
On 22/12/2017 09:47, Till Straumann wrote:
On 12/21/2017 04:36 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 22/12/2017 08:34, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Dec 21, 2017 3:04 PM, "Till Straumann" mailto:strau...@slac.stanford.edu>> wr
