Re: dynamic linker in RTEMS 5 ?

2017-12-22 Thread Chris Johns
On 22/12/17 11:06 am, Till Straumann wrote: > On 12/21/2017 05:18 PM, Chris Johns wrote: >> I am missing the reason why the list is important to cexp? Are symbols not >> enough? Sorry to be asking rather basic questions. > Sure, symbols are enough - however, cexp keeps its own symbol table(s) > wit

Re: dynamic linker in RTEMS 5 ?

2017-12-22 Thread Chris Johns
On 23/12/17 3:45 am, Till Straumann wrote: > FWIW - I had (a while ago) created the pmelf library (which is distributed > with > cexpsh but can be unbundled). > > The primary goals were: >  - independent licensing >  - only read pieces of a file which are actually needed. Most ELF libraries I > k

Re: dynamic linker in RTEMS 5 ?

2017-12-22 Thread Chris Johns
On 22/12/17 5:07 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote> At least at the moment all RTEMS targets use ELF. I removed all non-ELF support > in Binutils for obsolete RTEMS targets in January 2017. Sure, but I am not sure how this relates to the discussion. > It would be nice to have the ELF headers in RTEMS (or

Re: dynamic linker in RTEMS 5 ?

2017-12-22 Thread Till Straumann
On 12/22/2017 12:07 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 22/12/17 00:18, Chris Johns wrote: On 22/12/2017 09:47, Till Straumann wrote: On 12/21/2017 04:36 PM, Chris Johns wrote: On 22/12/2017 08:34, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Dec 21, 2017 3:04 PM, "Till Straumann" mailto:strau...@slac.stanford.edu>> wr