Re: [apache netbeans12[ [javafx] [install] Can't install correctly.

2022-02-13 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
“Though Azul is nice enough to create JRE and JRE + FX packages, you won’t see those from OpenJDK.“ Note: Azul Zulu builds of OpenJDK are builds of OpenJDK. Gj On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 03:55, Ernie Rael wrote: > On 2/13/22 6:08 PM, Scott Palmer wrote: > > > > I haven’t touch Swing in years and I

Re: [apache netbeans12[ [javafx] [install] Can't install correctly.

2022-02-13 Thread Ernie Rael
On 2/13/22 6:08 PM, Scott Palmer wrote: I haven’t touch Swing in years and I have no plans to use it again.  JavaFX is the way to go… though there are still a few missing pieces. Scott Hi Scott, just wondering in you have any insight into this. I fell in love with JavaFX, and was sorely dis

Re: [apache netbeans12[ [javafx] [install] Can't install correctly.

2022-02-13 Thread Scott Palmer
Since deployment these days means bundling a JRE, it doesn’t really make it any more of a pain to have a platform dependent library. Note that there is no such thing as an official JRE download these days. Though Azul is nice enough to create JRE and JRE + FX packages, you won’t see those from

Re: [apache netbeans12[ [javafx] [install] Can't install correctly.

2022-02-13 Thread Bernd Michaely
It's such a shame they dropped such a great piece of software like JavaFX from JDK. Compared to JavaFX, Swing looks age-old, in particular internally. (E.g., if I'm correct, a JavaFX TreeView uses an ObservableList of children, while JTree doesn't even use a java.util.List for its children.)