On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, 22:20 Jiří Kovalský I am glad to see that except two respondents the vast majority likes the
> proposal for only two mandatory major (with NetCAT programs) and two
> optional minor releases per year.
>
You could equally say that a vast majority of committers on dev@ wanted
fi
I am glad to see that except two respondents the vast majority likes the
proposal for only two mandatory major (with NetCAT programs) and two
optional minor releases per year.
The main argument against this release scheme, if I followed the
discussion correctly, is that frequent (quarterly or
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 22:17, Christian Lenz wrote:
> Maybe reducing the NetCat process or changing it?
OK, so in the interests of [DISCUSS] :-) I think Chris is right here.
I wasn't able to take part in NetCAT for NB10, but did for NB9, and
that process probably does need to adapt. We had a co
I like the idea of two major releases each year...those being releases
incorporating new functionality. However, I think it would be a good idea
to have patch releases in-between...making for a total of four releases
each year.
Josh
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 7:19 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi
Ok managed to solve this eventually.
Seems this only works with native java se. You cannot do this with maven.
The moment you create new project maven -> java, that platform option
disappears.
Kind Regards
Ben
> On 14 Nov 2018, at 06:27, Ben Fourie wrote:
>
> Hi everyone
>
> I’m new to thi
