March 10, 2018 10:16 PM, "Brett Ryan" wrote:
I'm still not seeing how you guys got it in, it's clearly not in my 8.2
install, and I can not see it anywhere on the plugin portal
http://plugins.netbeans.org (http://plugins.netbeans.org)
My Netbeans 9 build 221 shows the cvs plugin and it says: "So
Brett, the CVS plugin is provided by the "Certified Plugins" Update Center:
http://updates.netbeans.org/netbeans/updates/8.2/uc/final/certified/catalog.xml.gz
(See also in NetBeans under Tools -> Plugins -> Settings)
Certified plugins actually have a higher status than plugins in the Plugin
Port
My bad, installed will show even if you have a fresh install i think, it's
dependent on the dist you installed.
> On 11 Mar 2018, at 14:18, Brett Ryan wrote:
>
> btw, your sceenshot shows you have installed 44 additional plugins, so it is
> not a fresh install.
>
>> On 11 Mar 2018, at 13:09, e
btw, your sceenshot shows you have installed 44 additional plugins, so it is
not a fresh install.
> On 11 Mar 2018, at 13:09, emiddio-frontier wrote:
>
> Additionally see the attached gif of the repositories that plugins come from
> in my nb9beta.
>
> On 3/10/2018 6:04 PM, emiddio-frontier wr
On 03/10/2018 05:16 PM, Brett Ryan wrote:
> Did you import settings?
Nope.
> I don’t know how you all are getting cvs. When I do a fresh install
> with the same I don’t get it and it doesn’t appear in the plugin
> portal.
>
>> On 11 Mar 2018, at 09:39, Glenn Holmer wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/10/2018
Additionally see the attached gif of the repositories that plugins come
from in my nb9beta.
On 3/10/2018 6:04 PM, emiddio-frontier wrote:
I usually use import settings. But just to check i just deleted cache
and profile dirs of my nb90beta.
Then start netbeans and go to tools/plugins/availabl
I usually use import settings. But just to check i just deleted cache
and profile dirs of my nb90beta.
Then start netbeans and go to tools/plugins/available plugins, click the
NAME column to sort by name and look for CVS - It is there.
-Gary
On 3/10/2018 3:16 PM, Brett Ryan wrote:
Did you i
Hello John, Brett, and NetBeans users. Netbeans is installed on my Dell
Latitude E5570 laptop running Ubuntu 16.04.
The replies you have given me have given me some worthwhile leads. Although
the problem is annoying, it appears that post-checkout massaging has worked
up to now. I am managing about
Did you import settings?
I don’t know how you all are getting cvs. When I do a fresh install with the
same I don’t get it and it doesn’t appear in the plugin portal.
> On 11 Mar 2018, at 09:39, Glenn Holmer wrote:
>
>> On 03/10/2018 04:19 PM, Brett Ryan wrote:
>> If you are running 8.2, backup
Archived IS deprecated, it explicitly states “have been removed”. When it
happened it was announced and there was way less noise about it then than now.
If you are running 8.2, backup your user dir then delete it and restart, you
will not be able to get cvs support as it is also removed from the
Where does it say archived means deprecated ?
After NB701 CVS removed from core and made a plugin.
I have looked at the link - here is what it says.
Information About NetBeans IDE Archived Modules and Features
Some features available in earlier versions of the NetBeans IDE have
been removed.
Excellent !
On Mar 10, 2018 1:38 PM, "Jan Lahoda" wrote:
> FWIW, building with ant 1.10.2 should be fixed now:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/commit/
> 088b8b48118028f6f8490a96fdb17d26c279cd12
>
> Jan
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 7:14 PM, John Muczynski
> wrote:
>
>> I've seen pe
FWIW, building with ant 1.10.2 should be fixed now:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/commit/088b8b48118028f6f8490a96fdb17d26c279cd12
Jan
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 7:14 PM, John Muczynski wrote:
> I've seen people on the mailing list succeed with JDK 8, using Apache Ant
> version 1.10.
I've seen people on the mailing list succeed with JDK 8, using Apache Ant
version 1.10.1
--
Johnny Muczynski
734-262-2045
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 3:34 AM Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> PS: I’d also experiment with a slightly earlier version of Ant to see if
> tha
Hi Owen,
I see Brett is posting about the git portion of your questions. I'll try
to answer some of the others.
> I observe some compilation errors.
> Is something being cached
I also get this symptom when making changes to a large number of files in a
project. I think the root of the issue may
On 03/09/2018 08:31 PM, Jerry Nicholson wrote:
"It’s important for all technology that we don’t hold back younger
generations by supporting legacy as it slows evolution of technology."
I could not disagree more. It is important for youngsters to consider
the amount of commitment to a particula
We would need to know more about your environment to help. Is it possible to
share your codebase when the problem occurs provided it is not private?
If you install git [1] and use the cli (git-bash) by issuing `git status` in
the project path, what do you observe?
[1]: https://git-scm.com/
>
Hello.
I have been using NetBeans with Git (I moved my codebase from SVN about
about ten months ago), and I seem to have some problems after I open a
clean working copy.
After I commit my changes, I sometimes observe that some blue cylinder
embellishments remain next to some packages. I backup my
PS: I’d also experiment with a slightly earlier version of Ant to see if
that makes a difference.
On Saturday, March 10, 2018, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I really recommend you move this discussion to the dev@ mailing list,
> since that is the list applicable t
I really recommend you move this discussion to the dev@ mailing list, since
that is the list applicable to working with the NetBeans sources — ask for
someone who has built Apache NetBeans on Windows 10 to help
Gj
On Saturday, March 10, 2018, Shaun Flynn wrote:
> Windows 10 and Ant 1.10.2
>
> O
Which operating system are you building on and where does your Ant
installation come from?
Gj
On Saturday, March 10, 2018, Shaun Flynn wrote:
> Using JDK8 update 162 yields the same issue.
>
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 19:48 Geertjan Wielenga, com> wrote:
>
>> Definitely and explicitly JDK 9 is not s
21 matches
Mail list logo