Re: Long Live NetBeans!

2018-03-06 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Well, for the moment, the very best way to contribute back to Apache NetBeans is to be involved here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT In fact, that's more useful at this stage than money. :-) Gj On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:46 AM, ashtonho...@ymail.com wrote: > It's av

Re: Long Live NetBeans!

2018-03-06 Thread ashtonho...@ymail.com.INVALID
It's available https://www.name.com/domain/search/netbeansfield.comSent from my Huawei Mobile Original Message Subject: Re: Long Live NetBeans!From: John Muczynski To: ashtonho...@ymail.com.invalidCC: us...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org,geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.comMaybe a NetBea

Re: Using Maven Web Apps with Netbeans 9 BETA

2018-03-06 Thread John Muczynski
Hi Enrico, The module interfaces and update sites have the same apis in both 8.2 and 9.0 so ... just connect your 9.0 to an update site for NetBeans 8.2 and away you go. Kind Regards, Johnny I love NB too -- Johnny Muczynski 734-262-2045 On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote:

Using Maven Web Apps with Netbeans 9 BETA

2018-03-06 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi, Is there any way to use maven web app support modules of 8.2 in 9.0 beta? I know that part of NB has not been 'donated' yet but maybe there is a chance to copy those modules to 9.0 but I don't know which files to copy/install and if there are compatibility issues Thank you I love NB Enrico --

Re: Long Live NetBeans!

2018-03-06 Thread Glenn Holmer
On 03/06/2018 10:50 AM, Ashton Hogan wrote: > I, myself, as a user feel guilty benefitting as much as I do from > NetBeans and never having to pay a dime for it You could always assuage your guilt by joining the Community Acceptance Testing program (NetCAT): https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/di

Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

2018-03-06 Thread cowwoc
Hi, I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-447 Gili On 2018-03-06 12:34 PM, Paul Szudzik wrote: Hopefully this would be an option flag.. Otherwise I wouldn't know if I was overriding something by accident via a library load.. so, I would vote for option check, where if it was

Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

2018-03-06 Thread Paul Szudzik
Hopefully this would be an option flag.. Otherwise I wouldn't know if I was overriding something by accident via a library load.. so, I would vote for option check, where if it was CHECKED, would drop the fully qualified class names for base and non-overridden functions.. If I do override a fun

Re: Long Live NetBeans!

2018-03-06 Thread John Muczynski
Maybe a NetBeans field -- BeanField -- as in a field where beans are grown. -- Johnny Muczynski 734-262-2045 On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:13 PM Ashton Hogan wrote: > I like it, I like it a lot. Let's do it! > > On Tuesday, 6 March 2018, 17:01:20 GMT, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googl

Re: Long Live NetBeans!

2018-03-06 Thread Ashton Hogan
I like it, I like it a lot. Let's do it! On Tuesday, 6 March 2018, 17:01:20 GMT, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: Thanks for the enthusiasm. :-) As an Apache project, NetBeans will not be able to earn money directly -- all money coming into Apache goes to the foundation as a whole: http://www

Re: Long Live NetBeans!

2018-03-06 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Thanks for the enthusiasm. :-) As an Apache project, NetBeans will not be able to earn money directly -- all money coming into Apache goes to the foundation as a whole: http://www.apache.org/foundation/sponsorship.html However, potentially, there could be an organization that we set up together c

Long Live NetBeans!

2018-03-06 Thread Ashton Hogan
Hi all Like all of you, I use NetBeans to build my own projects. Lately I've noticed a particular competitor IDE being demanded more on job specs and wondered how they managed to grow so big so quick. Turns out they sell licenses as well as offering a free version. I, myself, as a user feel gu

Re: New netbeans.apache.org is live

2018-03-06 Thread Neil C Smith
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 at 15:31 Antonio wrote: > Ah, also works with https. Cool! > There's a mixed content warning though - one to add to the bug list! Should see what's required to make https the only option when that's fixed. No HTTP2 - that's a shame. Best wishes, Neil -- Neil C Smith Artist

Re: Java EE version support

2018-03-06 Thread Peter Steele
You need tomcat 8/9 for servlet 3.1 support which is what j2ee 7 provides On 6 Mar 2018 15:58, "Geertjan Wielenga" wrote: > There's a pretty big difference between Java 8 and Java EE 8... > > Gj > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:55 PM, James Finnall wrote: > >> My server states it is using JVM 1.8.0

Re: Java EE version support

2018-03-06 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
There's a pretty big difference between Java 8 and Java EE 8... Gj On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:55 PM, James Finnall wrote: > My server states it is using JVM 1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-0ubuntu0.16.04.2- > b12 > > I am told that indicates Java 8. > > James > > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:47 +0100, Geertjan W

Re: Java EE version support

2018-03-06 Thread James Finnall
My server states it is using JVM 1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-0ubuntu0.16.04.2- b12 I am told that indicates Java 8.   James On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:47 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Does Tomcat support Java EE 7? > > Gj > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:46 PM, James Finnall > wrote: > > The tutorial p

Re: Java EE version support

2018-03-06 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Does Tomcat support Java EE 7? Gj On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:46 PM, James Finnall wrote: > The tutorial provided a reference to using GlassFish server. I do have > the option for EE 7 on GlassFish. It did not mention Tomcat. > > When I choose Tomcat on a new project it only provides options for

Re: Java EE version support

2018-03-06 Thread James Finnall
The tutorial provided a reference to using GlassFish server.  I do have the option for EE 7 on GlassFish.  It did not mention Tomcat.   When I choose Tomcat on a new project it only provides options for version 6 and 5.  It does not list version 7. Thank you, James On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:32 +

Re: Java EE version support

2018-03-06 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
https://netbeans.org/kb/docs/javaee/javaee-gettingstarted.html Gj On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:30 PM, James Finnall wrote: > What about Java EE 7 then? > > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:16 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > > > Java EE 8 is not supported at this stage. > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > > On T

Re: New netbeans.apache.org is live

2018-03-06 Thread Antonio
Ah, also works with https. Cool! On 06/03/18 16:30, Antonio wrote: I miss some https digital certificate, though. On 06/03/18 16:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: Hi all, Take a look: https://netbeans.apache.org/ Many thanks to a lot of work over many months by several people -- especially Chri

Re: Java EE version support

2018-03-06 Thread James Finnall
What about Java EE 7 then? On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:16 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Java EE 8 is not supported at this stage. > > Gj > > >   > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:15 PM, James Finnall > > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > > > Just upgraded to Netbeans 8.2 and Java EE Base plug-in

Re: New netbeans.apache.org is live

2018-03-06 Thread Antonio
I miss some https digital certificate, though. On 06/03/18 16:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: Hi all, Take a look: https://netbeans.apache.org/ Many thanks to a lot of work over many months by several people -- especially Chris, Wade, Antonio, and Neil. The site looks awesome, multiple people

New netbeans.apache.org is live

2018-03-06 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Hi all, Take a look: https://netbeans.apache.org/ Many thanks to a lot of work over many months by several people -- especially Chris, Wade, Antonio, and Neil. The site looks awesome, multiple people now understand how it works, a lot more needs to be done, but we now have a minimal site up and

Re: Java EE version support

2018-03-06 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Java EE 8 is not supported at this stage. Gj > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:15 PM, James Finnall wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> Just upgraded to Netbeans 8.2 and Java EE Base plug-in is 1.31.1 as I >> recall. Attempting to get support for Java EE 7 or 8. Netbeans stated >> I needed to upgrade to

Java EE version support

2018-03-06 Thread James Finnall
Hello All, Just upgraded to Netbeans 8.2 and Java EE Base plug-in is 1.31.1 as I recall.  Attempting to get support for Java EE 7 or 8.  Netbeans stated I needed to upgrade to support string comparisons in a switch statement.   After the upgrades I am still limited to Java EE 6.  It does show Jav

Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

2018-03-06 Thread Claus Lüthje
That’s something I’d like to have, too. Regards, Claus > Am 06.03.2018 um 08:42 schrieb Thomas Kellerer : > > When using code-completion in JavaDocs (e.g. for a @see attribute), NetBeans > always inserts fully qualifed class names for parameters, e.g. > > @see #someMethod(java.lang.String,