On 7/21/2010 11:11 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> The first time you would run "yum update" on a machine that has been
> offline for a long time, it would notice that the timestamp file
> /var/cache/yum/i386/12/updates/cachecookie is a lot older than 1.5 hours,
> and hence it would connect to the
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:52:29 -0700, Paul wrote:
[metadata_expire after 1.5 hours]
> I ran a test by firing up a second F12 system that is even more out of
> date. When I was able to log in, it took at least 15 minutes for
> PackageKit to tell me I had 600 updates ready.
PackageKit is something
responses inline and at tail:
On 7/20/2010 11:48 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> I explicitly referred to "more plugins", but at a second thought their
> names would have been printed by 'yum -v repolist' already, too. There are
> optional plugins for Yum, see 'yum list yum-plugin\*', and not all
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:16:13 -0700, Paul wrote:
> >> When you run "yum update", watch out for more plugins. From time to time
> >> there are users who are hit by non-default plugins which exclude
> >> thousands
> >> of packages due to misconfiguration or bugs.
> >
> > Michael:
> >
> > Can you ela
On 7/20/2010 3:36 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> comments inline and at tail
>
> On 7/20/2010 2:04 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:45:11 -0700, Paul wrote:
>>
>>> I also wanted to check about what
>>> exactly "clean metadata" was going to do [...]
>> It is safe to run. The com
comments inline and at tail
On 7/20/2010 2:04 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:45:11 -0700, Paul wrote:
>
>
>> I also wanted to check about what
>> exactly "clean metadata" was going to do [...]
>>
> It is safe to run. The command deletes the local repository metadata
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:45:11 -0700, Paul wrote:
> The output of "yum -v repolist" follows (I am "su -l root" to run yum).
> Before I do the "yum clean metadata", I wanted to give a chance to
> comment on the repolist output.
Looks fine.
> I also wanted to check about what
> exactly "clean met
On 7/20/2010 1:25 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:14:26 -0700, Paul wrote:
>
>
>> I've been offline for quite awhile and today went in to do a yum update
>> to my system. I last did this on 14feb10. It claimed that there was a
>> flash plugin update and that was it. Nothing
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:14:26 -0700, Paul wrote:
> I've been offline for quite awhile and today went in to do a yum update
> to my system. I last did this on 14feb10. It claimed that there was a
> flash plugin update and that was it. Nothing from Fedora. This strikes
> me very strange.
How abou
I've been offline for quite awhile and today went in to do a yum update
to my system. I last did this on 14feb10. It claimed that there was a
flash plugin update and that was it. Nothing from Fedora. This strikes
me very strange.
My quick searches showed questions about yum and f13, but I didn'
10 matches
Mail list logo
