Jeffrey Walton writes:
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 5:29 PM Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
>
> Todd Zullinger writes:
>
> > Not per https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xsane/c/2cc8bf4
> > (Drop GIMP plugin for Fedora >= 41, 2024-10-13) and the
> > follow-up which fixes the
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 5:29 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Todd Zullinger writes:
>
> > Not per https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xsane/c/2cc8bf4
> > (Drop GIMP plugin for Fedora >= 41, 2024-10-13) and the
> > follow-up which fixes the reversed values in that commit
Todd Zullinger writes:
Not per https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xsane/c/2cc8bf4
(Drop GIMP plugin for Fedora >= 41, 2024-10-13) and the
follow-up which fixes the reversed values in that commit.
I would guess that's because gimp-3.x and the xsane-gimp
plugin don't play well toge
On Sat, 24 May 2025 at 19:12, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 12:19 PM Sam Varshavchik
> wrote:
> >>
> >> In gimp I'm missing the File/Create option to pull an image from a
> scanner.
> >> Google results
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 12:19 PM Sam Varshavchik
> wrote:
>>
>> In gimp I'm missing the File/Create option to pull an image from a scanner.
>> Google results mention the xsane-gimp package, but dnf in F42 knows nothing
>> about it.
>
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 12:19 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> In gimp I'm missing the File/Create option to pull an image from a scanner.
> Google results mention the xsane-gimp package, but dnf in F42 knows nothing
> about it.
>
> I did find /usr/share/sane/xsane/doc/sane-x
In gimp I'm missing the File/Create option to pull an image from a scanner.
Google results mention the xsane-gimp package, but dnf in F42 knows nothing
about it.
I did find /usr/share/sane/xsane/doc/sane-xsane-gimp-doc.html that tells me
to manually create a symbolic link. Huh? That&
a HP
printer/scanner to use a fixed IP within its front panel controls.
What else has changed in the meantime? Was there an update to xsane?
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.71.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 28 15:37:28 UTC 2022 x86_64
Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automa
Hello,
I'm on fedora 36 and I'm using an HP Laserjet Pro MFP M130fw, connected
through wifi, both as a printer and a scanner.
It seems that the scanner, via xsane, doesn't work anymore from yesterday.
Unfortunately the printer gets its ip via dhcp and yesterday I had to
reboot it an
On 5/15/22 12:46, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
The Brother DS-640 is a USB-interfaces document scanner. I've been
attempting to use it with the Xsane app. All I get is a 1/2" vertical
stripe.
AFAIK there is no option to Xsane that effects the displayed scan.
OTOH, I've tried two DS-64
On 5/15/22 12:46, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
The Brother DS-640 is a USB-interfaces document scanner. I've been
attempting to use it with the Xsane app. All I get is a 1/2" vertical
stripe.
AFAIK there is no option to Xsane that effects the displayed scan.
OTOH, I've tried two DS-64
On Sun, 15 May 2022 12:46:53 -0700
Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> Any pointers?
I was surprised to find my scanner working with xsane recently.
Before it worked, I'd always run a windows virtual machine
and forward the usb device to the VM so I could use the working
windows drivers and store
The Brother DS-640 is a USB-interfaces document scanner. I've been
attempting to use it with the Xsane app. All I get is a 1/2" vertical
stripe.
AFAIK there is no option to Xsane that effects the displayed scan.
OTOH, I've tried two DS-640 with the same result
Any po
On 2021-11-01 14:00, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:17:11 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
That doesn't make sense. Which drivers are you using?
Whatever I found when I first installed it years ago :-). Looking
in printers.conf I see this:
MakeModel Brother HL-2040 Foomatic/hpijs-pcl5e
O
On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:17:11 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> That doesn't make sense. Which drivers are you using?
Whatever I found when I first installed it years ago :-). Looking
in printers.conf I see this:
MakeModel Brother HL-2040 Foomatic/hpijs-pcl5e
Or maybe that's what the brother installer
On 2021-11-01 07:41, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 10:48:12 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
Found it! https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=263182
I no longer have an hp scanner or printer, so I removed
libsane-hpaio and hplip and no longer get the $@!# root
prompt in xsane or simple
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 10:48:12 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> Found it! https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=263182
>
> I no longer have an hp scanner or printer, so I removed
> libsane-hpaio and hplip and no longer get the $@!# root
> prompt in xsane or simple-scan
AARGH! Appare
On 10/31/21 07:48, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 10:25:45 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
It works, but is exactly like xsane, it asks for the root
password before finding the scanner :-(.
On the other hand, if I hit "cancel" instead of giving the
password, it is still able t
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 10:25:45 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> It works, but is exactly like xsane, it asks for the root
> password before finding the scanner :-(.
>
> On the other hand, if I hit "cancel" instead of giving the
> password, it is still able to scan, so someth
On Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:50:23 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> # dnf install simple-scan
>
> Here is how to get it to work on a network:
>
> https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=196697
> https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=143325
It works, but
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:08:33 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> If you give the root pw, scan, and then quit xsane and then restart xsane
> does it ask for the
> root pw again?
Yep, asks every time. I did find some ancient entries down in ~/.sane
for many older scanners I used once upon a t
Epson Artisan 725 which can't print any longer, but
can still scan. I'm using the wifi built in to it.
OK, I thought maybe it was a USB scanner being connected via CUPS.
If you give the root pw, scan, and then quit xsane and then restart xsane does
it ask for the
root pw again?
--
On
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 13:57:33 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> > Is there any magic I can do to avoid that root prompt? I can't
> > imagine I have to be root to connect to a network device.
>
> What type of scanner do you have and how is it networked?
It is an old Epson Artisan 725 which can't print a
On 31/10/2021 03:58, Tom Horsley wrote:
I have a network scanner. Every time I start xsane, it thinks a bit,
then prompts me for the root password, then finally the xsane
windows come up and I can scan.
Is there any magic I can do to avoid that root prompt? I can't
imagine I have to be ro
On 10/30/21 12:58, Tom Horsley wrote:
I have a network scanner. Every time I start xsane, it thinks a bit,
then prompts me for the root password, then finally the xsane
windows come up and I can scan.
Is there any magic I can do to avoid that root prompt? I can't
imagine I have to be ro
I have a network scanner. Every time I start xsane, it thinks a bit,
then prompts me for the root password, then finally the xsane
windows come up and I can scan.
Is there any magic I can do to avoid that root prompt? I can't
imagine I have to be root to connect to a network d
On 8/12/20 5:02 AM, Mike Flannigan wrote:
I hadn't tried simple-scan until now. It doesn't
automatically detect the scan size on my scanner,
and I don't see a way to adjust for scan size.
Otherwise it does work pretty good.
Right-click, crop, select size.
__
It is hard to argue that xsane is simple and intuitive,
but it does do a good job after you learn it. Even
the GOCR is respectable.
I hadn't tried simple-scan until now. It doesn't
automatically detect the scan size on my scanner,
and I don't see a way to adjust for scan siz
On 2020-04-09 21:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
/dev/bus/usb/001/006 is the device name.
°
[root@Workstation-1 bobg]# ls -al /dev/bus/usb/001/006
crw-rw-r--. 1 root root 189, 5 Apr 9 20:11 /dev/bus/usb/001/006
[root@Workstation-1 bobg]# chmod 777 /dev/bus/usb/001/006
[root@Workstation-1 bobg]# ls
On 4/9/20 4:48 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 2020-04-09 18:16, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Or try doing "chmod a+w /dev/bus/001/006" (replace with the correct
numbers if you've replugged or rebooted since your post).
.
After some trial and error I wound up doing chmod 775 /dev/bus/usb but
stilt not detec
On 2020-04-09 18:16, Samuel Sieb wrote:
It seems that udev is not recognizing it or you need to add yourself
to a different group.
.
i don't know what group?
You could run xsane as root as a workaround.
.
Did that earlier, it warned me not to run as root and the did not let me
sa
On 4/9/20 2:11 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Xsane can't see my scanner as user bobg, as root is detected.
bobg]# scanimage -L
device `genesys:libusb:001:006' is a Canon LiDE 110 flatbed scanner
[bobg@Workstation-1 ~]$ lsusb
Bus 001 Device 006: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
$
Xsane can't see my scanner as user bobg, as root is detected.
bobg]# scanimage -L
device `genesys:libusb:001:006' is a Canon LiDE 110 flatbed scanner
[bobg@Workstation-1 ~]$ lsusb
Bus 001 Device 006: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
$ sane-find-scanner
could not open
the text.
>>>
>>> It was working fine, and then a week ago went bad. I thought it was
>>> because I did an update and did not restart things. I rebooted over the
>>> weekend, and it is still doing this.
>>>
>>> I linart, but grey gives the sam
doing this.
I linart, but grey gives the same results.
I am running xsane via HP Device manager.
Anyone else seeing this problem?
thanks
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le
canner mode).
> So I copied the files in the directory ~/.sane/xsane from the other computer
> in the
> computer that it doesn't worked *AND THAT RESOLVED THE PROBLEM.
> *
> _Very strange the same working around didn't work by restoring the data with
>
I tried to reinstall the printer, and made many other tries (also restoring
the default options from the setting table) without success.
But likely I have another computer that use the same printer... (it works
good with scanner mode).
So I copied the files in the directory ~/.sane/xsane from the
I reinstalled CUPS but this wasn't enough.
actually when I launch xsane yournalctl report :
failed to open hpaio:/usb/Deskjet_2510_series?serial=CN34B3JGDN05TX: Error
during device IO
the window of xsane start anyhow, bu whe
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 5:22 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/
n't remember if I needed hp-setup for the first installation.
According to
https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing/supported_devices/index
your
printer doesn't need a plugin.
>
> I also tried to reinstall xsane but this wasn't enough (the file of setup
> rem
also tried to reinstall xsane but this wasn't enough (the file of setup
remained) .
xsane worked good for much time as till I made samting wrong ... (in the
setup panel (?))
*I rewrite the content of journalctl...*Aug 25 11:18:04 localhost.pluto
xsane[2791]: *scan/sane/http.c 300: unable
On 08/25/18 17:51, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> recently xsane stopped to work on my computer...
>
> I don't remember exactly what i did when this happened (perhaps I made
> something of
> wrong on the panel configuration setting ??).
>
> They are several days
recently xsane stopped to work on my computer...
I don't remember exactly what i did when this happened (perhaps I made
something of wrong on the panel configuration setting ??).
They are several days that I manage to fix this problem.Actually I get the
error :
"xsane error during
On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 12:47 +, johans...@telkomsa.net wrote:
> good day, Installed fedora25 - fully updated -installed xsane from
> repo - samsung scx4623f - works fine on various othet linux installed
> distros - multi boot setup.
> No detection by xsane scanner - xsane from repo
good day, Installed fedora25 - fully updated -installed xsane from repo -
samsung scx4623f - works fine on various othet linux installed distros - multi
boot setup.
No detection by xsane scanner - xsane from repo but no front or backends on
system - unable to locate any installable software
Allegedly, on or about 28 November 2015, Bob Goodwin sent:
> [bobg@Box10 ~]$ rpm -e --test gkrellm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> gkrellm >= 2.2.0 is needed by (installed)
> gkrellm-sun-1.0.0-18.fc23.x86_64
>
> I guess the --test stops it from actually erasing anything?
That's the idea.
On 11/28/15 05:51, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -e --test sane-backends-drivers-scanners
$
The simplest way of checking whether there are dependencies on a package.
Yes, F23 GNOME Workstation comes with this package pre-installed (just not
as a dependency). It used to be a bug in at least one o
re upgrades from F-22 but don't normally get connected to
> the scanner. They required the sane-backends-drivers although Xsane was
> already installed.
>
> All are xfce spins, perhaps had they been gnome to start with they would
> have been complete?
$ rpm -e --test sane-bac
hy it didn't get installed on Bob's system by the update
(assuming it was an update).
.
The computer in question, this one, began as F-23 beta, the other two I
just fixed were upgrades from F-22 but don't normally get connected to
the scanner. They required the sane-backends-driver
s system by the update
(assuming it was an update).
.
The computer in question, this one, began as F-23 beta, the other two I
just fixed were upgrades from F-22 but don't normally get connected to
the scanner. They required the sane-backends-drivers although Xsane was
already installed.
On 11/25/2015 10:46 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
Probably a new package with f23
Nope. It's there in F22:
[root@prophead ~]# rpm -qa | grep sane-backends-drivers
sane-backends-drivers-scanners-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.25-1.fc22.x86_64
Dunno why
On 11/25/2015 10:45 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 11/25/15 12:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
Does "sane-find-scanner" detect the right USB IDs for it? (run as
both you and a
Probably a new package with f23
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Bob Goodwin
wrote:
> On 11/25/15 12:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
>>> scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
>>>
>>
On 11/25/15 12:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
Does "sane-find-scanner" detect the right USB IDs for it? (run as
both you and as root and see &qu
On 11/25/2015 09:23 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 11/25/15 09:57, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have inquired on the Sane list, if it's a known problem I should get
an answer there.
.
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a
On 11/25/15 09:57, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have inquired on the Sane list, if it's a known problem I should get
an answer there.
.
So far, the best work around is to boot fedora-22 in order to use the
scanner. Xsane still works there without a hitch.
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
On 11/25/15 09:27, Walter Cazzola wrote:
Hi,
I can't say if this helps but I've a similar problem with my usb
scanner on Fedora 20.
Unplug and re-plug the scanner and then restart xsane (maybe repeated
several times) solves the problem in my case.
Walter
.
I've plugged it in
wer like this cannon.
Aha, I wentback and tried Vuescan as root and that works, xsane does
not! I think I prefer to stick with Xsane if I can so I will inquire on
the "Sane" mailing list next, I just resubscribed to it earlier this
morning. Knowing that my equipment is still working
Hi,
I can't say if this helps but I've a similar problem with my usb
scanner on Fedora 20.
Unplug and re-plug the scanner and then restart xsane (maybe repeated
several times) solves the problem in my case.
Walter
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I just discovered that I can
;
> > > SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="03f0",
> > ATTRS{idProduct}=="5611", GROUP="scanner", MODE="0660"
> > >
> I am beginning to think the scanner has failed. I bought it new and
> it has lived an easy lif
ttle used, however stuff does fail ... It has
always just worked!
I think I will try the xsane list, assuming it still exists, before I
give up. I have a similar HP scanner I can try if I can find the wall
wart for it,
Thank you for your response,
Bob
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia,
On 24.11.2015 21:41, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I just discovered that I can not use my flat bed scanner, xsane protests
"no devices available."
lsusb shows:
Bus 005 Device 007: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
I believe this has worked since installing F-23 beta originally...
Th
I just discovered that I can not use my flat bed scanner, xsane protests
"no devices available."
lsusb shows:
Bus 005 Device 007: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
I believe this has worked since installing F-23 beta originally...
The last dnf upgrade was done this mornin
ow to! I'm out of my range of abilities I guess?
Here is what I did:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-September/137284.html
I've simply created a script to change the permissions when I need
xsane. No doubt it will be different for Fedora 20 ...
Ok Michael, that appare
erday but don't see a way to fix the problem, don't
>> understand how to! I'm out of my range of abilities I guess?
>
> Here is what I did:
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-September/137284.html
>
>> I've simply created a script to change the p
uess?
Here is what I did:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-September/137284.html
I've simply created a script to change the permissions when I need
xsane. No doubt it will be different for Fedora 20 ...
--
Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"SCSI is NOT magic. There a
On 16/01/14 11:52, Michael Hennebry wrote:
IIRC, no.
I had to modify udev rules.
I looked at that yesterday but don't see a way to fix the problem, don't
understand how to! I'm out of my range of abilities I guess?
I've simply created a script to change the permission
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
After reading through that it seemed simpler just to live with running
su xsane, but I did the following:
[bobg@box10 ~]$ ls -l /dev/bus/usb/`lsusb |grep Canon |cut -d: -f1 |tr "
" / |cut -d/ -f 2,4`
crw-rw-r--. 1 roo
01/16/2014 05:32 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 16/01/14 06:38, Joachim Backes wrote:
See ifhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019760 can help you!
Joachim Backes
After reading through that it seemed simpler just to live with running
su xsane, but I did the
On 16/01/14 06:38, Joachim Backes wrote:
See ifhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019760 can help you!
Joachim Backes
After reading through that it seemed simpler just to live with running
su xsane, but I did the following:
[bobg@box10 ~]$ ls -l /dev/bus/usb/`lsusb |grep Canon
On 01/16/2014 12:35 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
>
> Xsane can only find the scanner as root.
>
> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
>
> This is an F-20 64 bit xfce system. I can probably get by this way but
> it is inco
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Xsane can only find the scanner as root.
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
This is an F-20 64 bit xfce system. I can probably get by this way but
it is
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Xsane can only find the scanner as root.
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
This is an F-20 64 bit xfce system. I can probably get by this way but
it is inconvenient.
What do I need to change?
I had
>
>
> Xsane can only find the scanner as root.
>
> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
>
> This is an F-20 64 bit xfce system. I can probably get by this way but
> it is inconvenient.
>
> What do I need to change?
>
> Bob
>
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 06:35:26PM -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
>
>
> Xsane can only find the scanner as root.
>
> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
>
> This is an F-20 64 bit xfce system. I can probably get by this way
>
Xsane can only find the scanner as root.
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
This is an F-20 64 bit xfce system. I can probably get by this way but
it is inconvenient.
What do I need to change?
Bob
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/w2bod
Box10 Fedora-20/64bit Linux
On 07/21/2013 04:20 PM, Antonio M wrote:
: ** Message: No devices in use, exit
Jul 21 16:19:06 Pc-campeggio-001 xsane: common/utils.c 187: unable to
load library libm.so: libm.so: impossibile aprire il file oggetto
condiviso: File o directory non esistente
Jul 21 16:19:06 Pc-campeggio-001 xsane
tnx ...it did the trick!!!
2013/7/21 Ed Greshko
> On 07/21/13 22:20, Antonio M wrote:
> > : ** Message: No devices in use, exit
> > Jul 21 16:19:06 Pc-campeggio-001 xsane: common/utils.c 187: unable to
> load library libm.so: libm.so: impossibile aprire il file oggetto
&
On 07/21/13 22:20, Antonio M wrote:
> : ** Message: No devices in use, exit
> Jul 21 16:19:06 Pc-campeggio-001 xsane: common/utils.c 187: unable to load
> library libm.so: libm.so: impossibile aprire il file oggetto condiviso: File
> o directory non esistente
> Jul 21 16:19:06 P
: ** Message: No devices in use, exit
Jul 21 16:19:06 Pc-campeggio-001 xsane: common/utils.c 187: unable to load
library libm.so: libm.so: impossibile aprire il file oggetto condiviso:
File o directory non esistente
Jul 21 16:19:06 Pc-campeggio-001 xsane: common/utils.c 68: unable to open
/var/lib
On 07/21/2013 03:51 PM, Antonio M wrote:
on a fresh F19 installation when I start Xsane or simple scanning,
multifunction printer is recognized, asHP MFC 1312, but it says that
device "hpaio" cannot be opened.
Any hint??
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : amontag52
Linux
on a fresh F19 installation when I start Xsane or simple scanning,
multifunction printer is recognized, asHP MFC 1312, but it says that device
"hpaio" cannot be opened.
Any hint??
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : amontag52
Linux Fedora 19 Schroedinger's cat
--
users mai
On 03/23/2013 09:31 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
When an 8.5 x 14 in document is put into my scanner, xsane scans only
the top
8.4 x 14 in portion of it. How can I change this behavior? (It's not
easy.)
Simple scan scans the entire document, so the problem is not
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
When an 8.5 x 14 in document is put into my scanner, xsane scans only the top
8.4 x 14 in portion of it. How can I change this behavior? (It's not easy.)
Simple scan scans the entire document, so the problem is not with the scanner
nor with the sane backend.
Sc
When an 8.5 x 14 in document is put into my scanner, xsane scans only
the top 8.4 x 14 in portion of it. How can I change this behavior?
(It's not easy.)
Simple scan scans the entire document, so the problem is not with the
scanner nor with the sane backend.
Scanner: FUJITSU ScanSnap
Hi all,
anybody knows something about the devicename of USB scanners which can
be used by the xsane command?
The manpage says: backendname:devicefile (eg: umax:/dev/sga). The
backend name is "canon", but how to find out the devicefile?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
https://www-use
On 2/23/2012 5:03 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 22:24 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
And, given that I
currently trying the hp-setup approach using material in the Fedora
repository (if that is the correct word), I am seeing that, as root, I
get nothing for lpinfo. And one of the s
On 2/23/2012 5:03 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 22:24 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
And, given that I
currently trying the hp-setup approach using material in the Fedora
repository (if that is the correct word), I am seeing that, as root, I
get nothing for lpinfo. And one of the s
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 09:09 +1030, Tim wrote:
> You could have a sample file for them to try out, or suggest a specific
> file that they'd already have on their system. Some people have a
> strange idea about what constitutes a *small* file. ;-) (It's only
> 50MB, I deal with bigger files than t
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 22:24 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> And, given that I
> currently trying the hp-setup approach using material in the Fedora
> repository (if that is the correct word), I am seeing that, as root, I
> get nothing for lpinfo. And one of the suggestions in the document is t
On 2/21/2012 2:29 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 21:01 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I'm going through
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_printing_problems and not
seeing anything since I am getting stuff printed and the doc seems to be
directed at stuff not getting printed
Paul Allen Newell:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_printing_problems
Tim Waugh:
> If you can see an improvement to be made to that page, please go ahead.
Unrelated to the original poster, but I can think of a small one. At
the end of the page there is this:
- begin p
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 21:01 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> I'm going through
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_printing_problems and not
> seeing anything since I am getting stuff printed and the doc seems to be
> directed at stuff not getting printed
If you can see an improvement
On 2/20/2012 8:57 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
.
I'm still happy, don't get me wrong ... its now just the little "oh,
wouldn't it be nice" sort of things and wanting to make sure the
running just hp-setup doesn't miss something (like the lp* functions).
Paul
For what it is worth ...
I'm
On 2/20/2012 12:19 AM, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul, glad you figgered it out. I had a feeling it was something of this
type. Like I say, 'the computer is always right, or garbage in...' ;)
Terry
===
[gabriel's reply:]
Hi,
Well I was in your situation some time ago, and wasnt obvious to me t
F14 as its beside me and not downstairs ... I've gone
up and down them so many times, I've gotten my manditory exercise for
the day!).
The great part was that when I ran the scanner tool, xsane immediately
found the HP 7510 and scans like a champ. Mind you, the HP 7510 won't
scan dire
;ve gone
> up and down them so many times, I've gotten my manditory exercise for
> the day!).
>
> The great part was that when I ran the scanner tool, xsane immediately
> found the HP 7510 and scans like a champ. Mind you, the HP 7510 won't
> scan directly to the Linux
downstairs ... I've gone
up and down them so many times, I've gotten my manditory exercise for
the day!).
The great part was that when I ran the scanner tool, xsane immediately
found the HP 7510 and scans like a champ. Mind you, the HP 7510 won't
scan directly to the Linux box as it
On 02/19/2012 06:27 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
That being said, I am 100% functional for printing and, given that I
only scan about 20 items a year, using the F14 or XP box is quite
acceptable. Not certain if my continued effort is actually going to gain
me anything except personal satisfactio
tten everything on my end square
for testing.
Printer is now static IP and, using "yum install system-config-print
cups hpijs", I can print from any machine.
Installed hplip, hplip-gui, and xsane.
On my F14 system, I can hook up a CanoScan N1240 LIDE30 via USB and
xsane works
On 2/18/2012 7:53 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 2/18/2012 7:22 PM, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul, this may or may not help, but I think this site is really good
as far
as setting up a USB scanner with xsane. It is a Gentoo site, but I think
most of it is applicable to Fedora as well. I
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
