On 09/11/2010 05:24 PM, john wendel wrote:
> On 09/11/2010 01:33 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 09/10/2010 07:55 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:10:56 -0700
>>> JD wrote:
>>>
If you build it from gnu tarball, then you will not get the
fixes that go into it from the commun
On 09/11/2010 01:33 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 09/10/2010 07:55 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:10:56 -0700
>> JD wrote:
>>
>>> If you build it from gnu tarball, then you will not get the
>>> fixes that go into it from the community before it is used
>>> in a distro. But then, it
On 09/10/2010 07:55 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:10:56 -0700
> JD wrote:
>
>> If you build it from gnu tarball, then you will not get the
>> fixes that go into it from the community before it is used
>> in a distro. But then, it might give the op what s/he wants.
>
> Of course
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:38:39 +0200
Rossella Noschese wrote:
> I've a question. At work we have a fedore core 4 release on a 64-bit
> machine. We need now to upgrade the compiler. We have GNU Fortran 95
> (GCC 4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat 4.0.0-8)). We need at least gcc version
> 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:10:56 -0700
JD wrote:
> If you build it from gnu tarball, then you will not get the
> fixes that go into it from the community before it is used
> in a distro. But then, it might give the op what s/he wants.
Of course the odds are good that the source is using
features not
On 09/10/2010 01:21 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 09/09/2010 07:14 PM, JD wrote:
>>
>> On 09/09/2010 11:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On 09/09/2010 02:38 PM, Rossella Noschese wrote:
>>>
I've a question. At work we have a fedore core 4 release on a 64-bit
machine. We need now to upgrade
On 09/09/2010 07:14 PM, JD wrote:
>
>
> On 09/09/2010 11:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 09/09/2010 02:38 PM, Rossella Noschese wrote:
>>
>>> I've a question. At work we have a fedore core 4 release on a 64-bit
>>> machine. We need now to upgrade the compiler. We have GNU Fortran 95 (GCC
>>> 4.0
On 09/09/2010 07:14 PM, JD wrote:
>
>
> On 09/09/2010 11:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 09/09/2010 02:38 PM, Rossella Noschese wrote:
>>
>>> I've a question. At work we have a fedore core 4 release on a 64-bit
>>> machine. We need now to upgrade the compiler. We have GNU Fortran 95 (GCC
>>> 4.0
--- On Thu, 9/9/10, JD wrote:
> On 09/09/2010 05:29 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> [snip]
> > IIRC, CentOS 5, the latest version, as well as
> Scientific Linux, too, is based off FC6. That's not
> all that far removed from 4, is it? Although, as I
> recall, FC6 worked so well, for me anyway, comp
On 09/09/2010 05:29 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Thu, 9/9/10, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:32 PM, JD
>>
>> wrote:
>>> Why not upgrade the whole installation to F13, or
>> better yet, on Nov 2nd,
>>> of this year F14 will be released! Upgrade to F14 and
>> then do yum
--- On Thu, 9/9/10, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:32 PM, JD
>
> wrote:
> > Why not upgrade the whole installation to F13, or
> better yet, on Nov 2nd,
> > of this year F14 will be released! Upgrade to F14 and
> then do yum update
> > to get the latest compilers.
>
> Although t
On 09/09/2010 11:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 09/09/2010 02:38 PM, Rossella Noschese wrote:
>
>> I've a question. At work we have a fedore core 4 release on a 64-bit
>> machine. We need now to upgrade the compiler. We have GNU Fortran 95 (GCC
>> 4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat 4.0.0-8)). We need at le
we were doing embedded linux development.
On 09/09/2010 10:43 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:32 PM, JD wrote:
>> Why not upgrade the whole installation to F13, or better yet, on Nov 2nd,
>> of this year F14 will be released! Upgrade to F14 and then do yum update
>> to get the
On 09/09/2010 02:38 PM, Rossella Noschese wrote:
> I've a question. At work we have a fedore core 4 release on a 64-bit
> machine. We need now to upgrade the compiler. We have GNU Fortran 95 (GCC
> 4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat 4.0.0-8)). We need at least gcc version 4.1.2
> 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42).
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:32 PM, JD wrote:
> Why not upgrade the whole installation to F13, or better yet, on Nov 2nd,
> of this year F14 will be released! Upgrade to F14 and then do yum update
> to get the latest compilers.
Although the OP didn't say one way or the other, the fact they are
still
On 09/09/2010 06:38 AM, Rossella Noschese wrote:
> Hello,
> I've a question. At work we have a fedore core 4 release on a 64-bit
> machine. We need now to upgrade the compiler. We have GNU Fortran 95
> (GCC 4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat 4.0.0-8)). We need at least gcc version
> 4.1.2 20071124 (Red H
On 09/09/2010 09:58 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Rossella Noschese
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I've a question. At work we have a fedore core 4 release on a 64-bit
>> machine. We need now to upgrade the compiler. We have GNU Fortran 95 (GCC
>> 4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat 4.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Rossella Noschese
wrote:
> Hello,
> I've a question. At work we have a fedore core 4 release on a 64-bit
> machine. We need now to upgrade the compiler. We have GNU Fortran 95 (GCC
> 4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat 4.0.0-8)). We need at least gcc version 4.1.2
> 20071124 (R
Hello,
I've a question. At work we have a fedore core 4 release on a 64-bit
machine. We need now to upgrade the compiler. We have GNU Fortran 95 (GCC
4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat 4.0.0-8)). We need at least gcc version 4.1.2
20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42). I'm not a great shell user, so can you help me?
Ho
19 matches
Mail list logo
