On 07/05/2011 05:38 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
...
> Usually the ChangeLog lines for the bind package include a CVE number so I
> wouldn't generally want to assume that it did but the upstream advisories for
> both CVEs specifically mention 9.8.0-P4 as containing the fix:
>
> http://www.isc.org/so
On 07/05/2011 10:25 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=251722
>
> I -think- this has the fix based on the links you gave - at least it
> appears that P4 fixes this/these - but there are no comments for the
> build that explicitly say that CVE-2011-2
On 07/05/2011 04:28 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 07:42 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
...
>
> You can use the CVE numbers as a bugzilla alias to access these bugs:
>
>
Thanks for the tips - very useful- I did look at these - and I also
looked in koji and ended here:
http://koji.fedo
On 07/05/2011 07:42 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
> Is there an update for bind coming to F15/6 to address
>
> CVE-2011-2464 / CVE-2011-2465
You can use the CVE numbers as a bugzilla alias to access these bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-2464
https://bugzilla.red
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
> Is there an update for bind coming to F15/6 to address
>
> CVE-2011-2464 / CVE-2011-2465
>
>
> I didn't find one in koji ..
Looks like bind-9.8.0-7.P4.fc16 is currently building but that is affected too?
--
mike c
--
users mailing
Is there an update for bind coming to F15/6 to address
CVE-2011-2464 / CVE-2011-2465
I didn't find one in koji ..
Thanks ...
gene
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
