Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 02:20 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> as squeezed out if I remember right to make room
>
>>> for the cookie) ...
>>>
>>> and therefore some performance degradation when the machine gets busy
>>> ... so its never been totally problem free in that sense ...
>
On 06/01/2011 02:20 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
as squeezed out if I remember right to make room
>> for the cookie) ...
>>
>>and therefore some performance degradation when the machine gets busy
>> ... so its never been totally problem free in that sense ...
>>
>>
> Depending on what you do, more
Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 12:57 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:09:35 -0400,
>>
>> Unless there is some other alternate way to maintain state in the packets,
>> the DoS attacks will still work. If you aren't worried about those you
>> could turn it off.
>>
>> A
On 06/01/2011 12:57 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:09:35 -0400,
>
> Unless there is some other alternate way to maintain state in the packets,
> the DoS attacks will still work. If you aren't worried about those you
> could turn it off.
>
> Also, my memory is that there i
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:09:35 -0400,
Genes MailLists wrote:
>
> Right - I understand its purpose and benefits - but networking (and
> the speed and window sizes) have changed since 1996 ... my question is
> if it is still good practice today to use it?
Unless there is some other alternate
On 06/01/2011 10:40 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:35:18 -0400,
> Genes MailLists wrote:
>>
>> Networking Gurus:
>>
>> In the past I've set my firewall to use tcp_syncookies - but this
>> prevents certain tcp options - given the current state of the internet -
>> can
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:35:18 -0400,
Genes MailLists wrote:
>
> Networking Gurus:
>
> In the past I've set my firewall to use tcp_syncookies - but this
> prevents certain tcp options - given the current state of the internet -
> can someone opine on whether this should continue to be us
Networking Gurus:
In the past I've set my firewall to use tcp_syncookies - but this
prevents certain tcp options - given the current state of the internet -
can someone opine on whether this should continue to be used or not?
I assume ipv6 is different ..
--
users mailing list
users@lists