Re: Startup time fixed - Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/17/2014 03:55 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 03:43:27PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: This takes a LONG time until the failed message appears. 'ps axu|grep hip' shows the service is running. but status shows: I suspect some of the comments in the init.d file are confu

Re: Startup time fixed - Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 03:43:27PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >>This takes a LONG time until the failed message appears. 'ps axu|grep > >>hip' shows the service is running. but status shows: > >I suspect some of the comments in the init.d file are confusing it. > Deleted all comment lines tha

Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/17/2014 03:33 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 03:15:57PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: There's not going to be a systemctl option -- but what does your .service file look like? What .service file? Where do I look for it? if you mean a file with a name of 'hipfw.servi

Startup time fixed - Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/17/2014 02:55 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:07:33 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: This takes a LONG time until the failed message appears. 'ps axu|grep hip' shows the service is running. but status shows: I suspect some of the comments in the init.d file are confusing it.

Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 03:15:57PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >There's not going to be a systemctl option -- but what does your .service > >file look like? > What .service file? Where do I look for it? if you mean a file > with a name of 'hipfw.service', no such animal. But then the hip >

Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/17/2014 02:49 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:44:39PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: CentOS 7 will be based on RHEL 7, which includes systemd and therefore systemctl. Important to know, but I will have to support Centos 6 for a while, even if Centos 7 were to come ou

Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:07:33 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > This takes a LONG time until the failed message appears. 'ps axu|grep > hip' shows the service is running. but status shows: I suspect some of the comments in the init.d file are confusing it. I seem to recall we have a similar problem

Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:44:39PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >CentOS 7 will be based on RHEL 7, which includes systemd and therefore > >systemctl. > Important to know, but I will have to support Centos 6 for a while, > even if Centos 7 were to come out tomorrow. Right, so, equally so: there

Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/17/2014 02:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:07:33PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So for a number of versions, 'service' has been a front end to 'systemctl'. I have a service I am testing the Host Identity Protocol, and the HIPL implementation: http://infrahip.hiit

Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 04/17/2014 02:20 PM, poma wrote: On 17.04.2014 20:07, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So for a number of versions, 'service' has been a front end to 'systemctl'. I have a service I am testing the Host Identity Protocol, and the HIPL implementation: http://infrahip.hiit.fi/ that is still built around

Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:07:33PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > So for a number of versions, 'service' has been a front end to > 'systemctl'. I have a service I am testing the Host Identity > Protocol, and the HIPL implementation: http://infrahip.hiit.fi/ that > is still built around 'service'.

Re: systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread poma
On 17.04.2014 20:07, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > So for a number of versions, 'service' has been a front end to > 'systemctl'. I have a service I am testing the Host Identity Protocol, > and the HIPL implementation: http://infrahip.hiit.fi/ that is still > built around 'service'. And they maintain

systemctl versus service

2014-04-17 Thread Robert Moskowitz
So for a number of versions, 'service' has been a front end to 'systemctl'. I have a service I am testing the Host Identity Protocol, and the HIPL implementation: http://infrahip.hiit.fi/ that is still built around 'service'. And they maintain binaries for a number of distros, including Centos