Re: systemctl status distccd

2020-06-17 Thread Tim via users
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 16:08 +0200, Michael J. Baars wrote: > For me, it's not the first time that a server fails to start > with the configuration files that come with Fedora. I couldn't tell THAT from your post, you should have said so and not turned it into a guessing game. It's no wonder some

Re: systemctl status distccd

2020-06-17 Thread Michael J. Baars
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 15:46 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-06-17 14:36, Tim via users wrote: > > Tim: > > > > There doesn't seem to be a question in your email. > > > > > > Ed Greshko: > > > You have to open the attachments to learn what is the issue. > > I did, before I wrote that. There s

Re: systemctl status distccd

2020-06-17 Thread Michael J. Baars
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 11:23 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 13:50 +0200, Michael J. Baars wrote: > > Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list. > > There doesn't seem to be a question in your email. That's because there is none, it's only the initial probl

Re: systemctl status distccd

2020-06-17 Thread Ed Greshko
On 2020-06-17 14:36, Tim via users wrote: > Tim: >>> There doesn't seem to be a question in your email. > > > Ed Greshko: >> You have to open the attachments to learn what is the issue. > I did, before I wrote that. There still isn't a question, just some > submitted log files. He doesn't ask a

Re: systemctl status distccd

2020-06-16 Thread Tim via users
Tim: >> There doesn't seem to be a question in your email. Ed Greshko: > You have to open the attachments to learn what is the issue. I did, before I wrote that. There still isn't a question, just some submitted log files. He doesn't ask anything about them. I don't know if this is some kind

Re: systemctl status distccd

2020-06-16 Thread Ed Greshko
On 2020-06-17 09:53, Tim via users wrote: > On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 13:50 +0200, Michael J. Baars wrote: >> Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list. > There doesn't seem to be a question in your email. > You have to open the attachments to learn what is the issue. -- The k

Re: systemctl status distccd

2020-06-16 Thread Tim via users
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 13:50 +0200, Michael J. Baars wrote: > Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list. There doesn't seem to be a question in your email. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1127.10.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 3 14:28:03 UTC 2020 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpe

Re: systemctl status distccd

2020-06-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 13:50 +0200, Michael J. Baars wrote: > Hi, > > Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list. What is this and why is it relevant to this list rather than initscripts-devel? I'd appreciate being able to read what something's about without having to open an a

systemctl status distccd

2020-06-16 Thread Michael J. Baars
Hi, Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list. Best regards, Mischa. distccd.service.d.tar.xz Description: application/xz-compressed-tar [root@tp02 ~]# systemctl status distccd ● distccd.service - Distccd A Distributed Compilation Server Loaded: loaded (/us

systemctl status distccd

2020-06-16 Thread Michael J. Baars
Hi, Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list. Best regards, Mischa. distccd.service.d.tar.xz Description: application/xz-compressed-tar [root@tp02 ~]# systemctl status distccd ● distccd.service - Distccd A Distributed Compilation Server Loaded: loaded (/us