On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 15:55:06 -0500
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> EFI boot entries are built based on the UUID of the volume and then a
> path to the EFI executable, so you would just need to create another
> EFI entry, either for a different EFI volume with a standard path or
> the same EFI volume wi
On Jan 7, 2022, at 11:16, stan via users wrote:
>
> Thanks for the information, but you lost me at the multiple EFI
> executables in different directories. How would boot know which
> executable to choose? I thought it was the /boot/efi/EFI/fedora that
> cued it that this is the system to boot.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 22:09:42 -0500
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> But you can have multiple EFI volumes, and with boot loader spec
> configuration, you don’t need a lot of special configuration in the
> EFI volume anymore, so I bet you can get away with multiple EFI
> executables in different directo
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 14:13, stan via users
wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:25:10 -0500
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:12:04 -0500
> > Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >
> > > that sounds interesting, but don't you also need separate /
> > > partitions with all the release specific sof
On Jan 6, 2022, at 13:14, stan via users wrote:
>
> It doesn't work with EFI, because EFI only allows a single version of
> any OS; so only a single fedora version. Systemd-boot *does* allow
> booting multiple versions of an OS, but *only* EFI.
That’s not really a limit with EFI. It’s more that
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022, Matthew Miller wrote:
Thanks! Yeah, I agree that that's confusing. The problem is that that
document is coming from our Program Management team, and that team mostly is
concerned with the releases we're developing ? so current releases are
"old". :)
Perhaps old could be cha
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:25:10 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:12:04 -0500
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> > that sounds interesting, but don't you also need separate /
> > partitions with all the release specific software?
>
> Yep. My actual scheme has a tiny grub2 stand alone pa
Hi
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:30 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> In addition to fixing the typo, I also de-indented the "Supported
> Releases" and "EOL Releases" (thus removing the "Old Releases") in the
> navigation bar to help make things more clear.
>
Quick note: The gmane link in that page is dead be
On 1/5/2022 8:47 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> Three approaches:
>
> Upgrade 1 release close to the EOL of current release. This way you are
> moving to a mature release.
I generally like to recommend staying 1 release behind for stability... but as
you note:
>
> Choose your poison.
it's
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:12:04 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> that sounds interesting, but don't you also need separate / partitions
> with all the release specific software?
Yep. My actual scheme has a tiny grub2 stand alone partition
which uses the "configfile" grub command to be able to boot
on
On 1/5/22 21:03, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 20:47:06 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Three approaches:
I go with the 4th approach: Keep two separate boot partitions and
upgrade right away in one of them so I can go back to previous
version trivially if it turns out something is horr
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 20:47:06 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Three approaches:
I go with the 4th approach: Keep two separate boot partitions and
upgrade right away in one of them so I can go back to previous
version trivially if it turns out something is horribly wrong.
I running fedora 35 now wi
On 1/4/22 18:20, Slade Watkins via users wrote:
hi,
Until when will Fedora 34 be supported?
if I recall correctly, the End of Life (EOL) date is May 17th, 2022. someone
else on the list can correct me if I am wrong though.
Is it highly recommended that I upgrade to Fedora 35 at this point?
On 1/5/2022 12:59 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:32 AM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> Oh! I see Ben has already changed it. Should be live soon. :)
>
> Well, once the build failures[1] are fixed.
>
> In addition to fixing the typo, I also de-indented the "Supported
> Releases" an
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:32 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
> Oh! I see Ben has already changed it. Should be live soon. :)
Well, once the build failures[1] are fixed.
In addition to fixing the typo, I also de-indented the "Supported
Releases" and "EOL Releases" (thus removing the "Old Releases") in t
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, at 3:11 PM, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
> I will ask this question here since I didn't understand the
> explanations I found elsewhere.
> Until when will Fedora 34 be supported?
> Is it highly recommended that I upgrade to Fedora 35 at this point?
I know this is all sorted
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:26:40AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Thanks! Yeah, I agree that that's confusing. The problem is that that
> document is coming from our Program Management team, and that team mostly is
> concerned with the releases we're developing — so current releases are
> "old". :)
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:05:03AM -0500, Slade Watkins wrote:
> yes, happy to help! what I was referring to was the sorting of the
> sections in the sidebar on this page:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/lifecycle/
Thanks! Yeah, I agree that that's confusing. The problem is that t
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:45 AM Anil Felipe Duggirala
wrote:
>
> Then I consulted this site,
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/lifecycle/
> That site says exactly what you confirmed (13 months after the release).
> However I got a bit confused in the section called Maintenance sched
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 03:44, Anil Felipe Duggirala <
anilduggir...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, at 7:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 06:11:24PM -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
> >> I will ask this question here since I didn't understand the
> explanations
On 1/4/2022 10:57 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Sorry, which section? Do you have a link? We're working on redesigning the
> layout of our docs, so looking at this is timely. :)
>
yes, happy to help! what I was referring to was the sorting of the sections in
the sidebar on this page:
https://d
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022, at 7:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 06:11:24PM -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
>> I will ask this question here since I didn't understand the explanations I
>> found elsewhere. Until when will Fedora 34 be supported?
>
> Until 4 weeks after the Fedor
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 08:06:29PM -0500, Slade Watkins via users wrote:
> >I'm curious where you found the explanations that were confusing, and how
> >we could improve them.
> hi,
> for me, it's not necessarily that the explanations were confusing,
> but rather the section on the site itself.
So
On 1/4/2022 7:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Until 4 weeks after the Fedora Linux 36 release. That's currently scheduled
for 2022-04-19, which makes EOL for Fedora Linux 34 2022-05-17.
I'm curious where you found the explanations that were confusing, and how we
could improve them.
hi,
for me, i
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 06:11:24PM -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote:
> I will ask this question here since I didn't understand the explanations I
> found elsewhere. Until when will Fedora 34 be supported?
Until 4 weeks after the Fedora Linux 36 release. That's currently scheduled
for 2022-04-19,
hi,
> Until when will Fedora 34 be supported?
if I recall correctly, the End of Life (EOL) date is May 17th, 2022. someone
else on the list can correct me if I am wrong though.
> Is it highly recommended that I upgrade to Fedora 35 at this point?
would worry about it closer to EOL.
best,
slade
I will ask this question here since I didn't understand the explanations I
found elsewhere.
Until when will Fedora 34 be supported?
Is it highly recommended that I upgrade to Fedora 35 at this point?
thank you,
Anil F
___
users mailing list -- users@l
27 matches
Mail list logo
