Re: off-topic (maybe) Firefox: stop trying HTTPS without asking me

2025-02-22 Thread Tim via users
f my sanity, and maybe it'll help others, I've made these changes: browser.fixup.fallback-to-https = false This should stop any time I want to go to http://192.168.1.254 changing without my authority to https://192.168.1.254. As far as I'm concerned that should never have happened,

Re: off-topic (maybe) Firefox: stop trying HTTPS without asking me

2025-02-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
do NOT have HTTPS. Most things don't need it. It just increases workload to encrypt unimportant things. And I wish they'd stop hiding HTTP and HTTPS in the address bar. Let me see the letters there so I know what it's doing. Does anybody have any answers about how to force the

off-topic (maybe) Firefox: stop trying HTTPS without asking me

2025-02-21 Thread Tim via users
things do NOT have HTTPS. Most things don't need it. It just increases workload to encrypt unimportant things. And I wish they'd stop hiding HTTP and HTTPS in the address bar. Let me see the letters there so I know what it's doing. Does anybody have any answers about how to for

Re: off-topic (maybe) Firefox: stop trying HTTPS without asking me

2025-02-21 Thread Will McDonald
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 14:32, Tim via users wrote: > Hi, > > Just thought I'd try asking here, because I'm not having much luck with > Google... > > Many times, way too many damn times, if I try to access some address > with Firefox it will go into HTTPS mode when I don't want it to. Untested b

Re: off-topic (maybe) Firefox: stop trying HTTPS without asking me

2025-02-21 Thread Fulko Hew
> > G, I hate autocorrect style of crap everywhere they put it. > > The HTTPS-only modes are disabled. Stupid option that is. Many things > do NOT have HTTPS. Most things don't need it. It just increases > workload to encrypt unimportant things. > > And I w

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-11-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 09:25:33PM +1030, Tim via users wrote: > On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 21:39 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote: > > So when do you plan to actually STOP POSTING? > > WHEN I DAMN WELL FEEL LIKE IT! > > When do you plan to take your head out of your ass? >

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-11-01 Thread Michael Hennebry
When a top post quotes boilerplate, one case be certain that it's a case of don't care or TH;DDI. -- Michael henne...@mail.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons* why it is necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then." -- John

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-11-01 Thread Tim via users
On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 21:39 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote: > So when do you plan to actually STOP POSTING? WHEN I DAMN WELL FEEL LIKE IT! When do you plan to take your head out of your ass? -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.119.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 4 14:43:51 UTC 2024 x86

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-31 Thread Thomas Dineen
So when do you plan to actually STOP POSTING? On 10/31/2024 9:20 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Fri, 2024-11-01 at 09:00 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: I understand the list guidelines specify to not top post, which I follow, I was just curious as to why. I hadn't looked at the guidelines for

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-31 Thread Tim via users
On Fri, 2024-11-01 at 09:00 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > I understand the list guidelines specify to not top post, which I > follow, I was just curious as to why. I hadn't looked at the guidelines for ages, but it *does* help *some* people actually pay attention to following them when it gives s

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-31 Thread Stephen Morris
On 31/10/24 09:25, Joe Zeff wrote: On 10/30/2024 03:46 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: although having said that I also get annoyed if I have to read through multiple mail threads to get the full context of what the reply is addressing, and in my view it is bad mail etiquette to not include that con

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-30 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 10/30/24 3:16 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 31/10/24 09:04, Bob Marčan via users wrote: The only sensible answer. It spoils the logical sequence. No problems, thankyou, I was just curious because the other thing I forgot to mention is those organisations also had the "standard" that if your

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-30 Thread Fulko Hew
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 6:17 PM Stephen Morris wrote: ... snip ... No problems, thankyou, I was just curious because the other thing I forgot > to mention is those organisations also had the "standard" that if your > reply was not top posted your reply would not be read. > I'll add that a) most

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-30 Thread Joe Zeff
On 10/30/2024 03:46 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: although having said that I also get annoyed if I have to read through multiple mail threads to get the full context of what the reply is addressing, and in my view it is bad mail etiquette to not include that context Yes, you include enough text t

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-30 Thread Bob Marčan via users
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:54:47 -0400 "Felix Miata" wrote: > Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100): > > > Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in > > consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are the > > reasons for this mail list to

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-30 Thread Stephen Morris
On 31/10/24 09:04, Bob Marčan via users wrote: On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:54:47 -0400 "Felix Miata" wrote: Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100): Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-30 Thread Felix Miata
Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100): > Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in > consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are the > reasons for this mail list to be averse to that methodology (just curious). A: Top-posters who

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-30 Thread Stephen Morris
On 30/10/24 21:06, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 17:26 -0700, Mike Wright wrote: On 10/29/24 15:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: All I had to do in Evolution in replying to this was mark the text above before hitting Reply to List. No editing required. Nice tip! Also works in

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-30 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 17:26 -0700, Mike Wright wrote: > On 10/29/24 15:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > All I had to do in Evolution in replying to this was mark the text > > above before hitting Reply to List. No editing required. > > Nice tip! Also works in Thunderbird. It also used to work

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-29 Thread Mike Wright
On 10/29/24 15:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: All I had to do in Evolution in replying to this was mark the text above before hitting Reply to List. No editing required. Nice tip! Also works in Thunderbird. :m -- ___ users mailing list -- users@list

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 14:57 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote: > > It makes it damn near impossible to read the message.  And clearly, > > from the lack of attention being paid to what's said in a couple of > > recent threads, you're not reading it all, anyway. > > What annoys me is having the scan th

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-29 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Tim via users wrote: When you post to this group crop out all the quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes quotes of quotes of It makes it damn near impossible to re

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 23:19 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > When you post to this group crop out all the quotes of quotes of quotes > of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes [...] > It makes it damn near impossible to read the message. And clearly, > from the lack of

stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

2024-10-29 Thread Tim via users
When you post to this group crop out all the quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quot

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-06-03 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Jeffrey Walton writes: On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 6:42 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Tim via users writes: > > > Tim: > > >> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post- > > >> install? > > > > Kevin Fenzi: > > > No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact o

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-06-03 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 6:42 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Tim via users writes: > > > Tim: > > >> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post- > > >> install? > > > > Kevin Fenzi: > > > No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact of the way > > > some insta

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-06-03 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Tim via users writes: Tim: >> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post- >> install? Kevin Fenzi: > No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact of the way > some installs work that it's there. There was some talk about it > removing itself at the end,

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-06-02 Thread Tim via users
Tim: >> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post- >> install? Kevin Fenzi: > No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact of the way > some installs work that it's there. There was some talk about it > removing itself at the end, but I am not sure where t

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-06-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 06:07:24AM GMT, Tim via users wrote: > On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 08:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Interesting. So, the only thing I see that requires systemd-resolved > > is anaconda-core. However, systemd itself has a 'recommends' for it, > > so perhaps thats what pulled it

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-31 Thread Tim via users
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 08:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Interesting. So, the only thing I see that requires systemd-resolved > is anaconda-core. However, systemd itself has a 'recommends' for it, > so perhaps thats what pulled it back in? > > So, possibly keeping it installed, but masked is a bett

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-31 Thread Felix Miata
Sam Varshavchik composed on 2024-05-31 12:13 (UTC-0400): > Masking is just solving the X of an XY problem. Either the dependencies > being masked are not needed, or if they are needed masking would break > something. I like KISS: # inxi -Sz System: Kernel: 6.8.11-300.fc40.x86_64 arch: x86_

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-31 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Kevin Fenzi writes: On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 04:25:44PM GMT, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Kevin Fenzi writes: > > > So, I think if you: > > > > disable systemd-resolved > > or > > make /etc/resolv.conf a real file, not a link. > > or > > set 'DNSStubListener=no' in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf > > > >

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-31 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 04:25:44PM GMT, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Kevin Fenzi writes: > > > So, I think if you: > > > > disable systemd-resolved > > or > > make /etc/resolv.conf a real file, not a link. > > or > > set 'DNSStubListener=no' in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf > > > > It will not be repla

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Samuel Sieb writes: On 5/30/24 3:44 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:06 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/30/24 2:12 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: I guess what the logic or script is missing (the one Kevin detailed) is, what to do if NetworkManager is installed and running. That see

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/30/24 3:44 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:06 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/30/24 2:12 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: I guess what the logic or script is missing (the one Kevin detailed) is, what to do if NetworkManager is installed and running. That seems like where the prob

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:06 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 5/30/24 2:12 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > I guess what the logic or script is missing (the one Kevin detailed) > > is, what to do if NetworkManager is installed and running. That seems > > like where the problem occured in your case. In yo

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Mike Wright
preset/20-systemd-resolved-disable.preset' Here's one that doesn't eat yet another inode ( and saves some typing ) for f in disable stop mask; do sudo systemctl $f systemd-resolved; done -- I just wasted at least a week with systemd-networkd trying to configure half a dozen or so b

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/30/24 2:12 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: I guess what the logic or script is missing (the one Kevin detailed) is, what to do if NetworkManager is installed and running. That seems like where the problem occured in your case. In your case (and others like you), it seems like the condition 'Networ

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 4:33 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Todd Zullinger writes: > > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > [...snip loads of useful information...] > > > So, I think if you: > > > > > > disable systemd-resolved > > > > To that end, the change proposal¹ when systemd-resolved was > > enabled by

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Todd Zullinger writes: Kevin Fenzi wrote: [...snip loads of useful information...] > So, I think if you: > > disable systemd-resolved To that end, the change proposal¹ when systemd-resolved was enabled by default (F33) contains an example of how to ensure the service remains disabled -- which w

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Kevin Fenzi writes: So, I think if you: disable systemd-resolved or make /etc/resolv.conf a real file, not a link. or set 'DNSStubListener=no' in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf It will not be replaced anymore. I did not even /have/ systemd-resolved installed. dnf system-upgrade installed it on

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Todd Zullinger
Kevin Fenzi wrote: [...snip loads of useful information...] > So, I think if you: > > disable systemd-resolved To that end, the change proposal¹ when systemd-resolved was enabled by default (F33) contains an example of how to ensure the service remains disabled -- which would avoid the situation

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
For whatever it's worth, the logic to replace or not replace /etc/resolv.conf has gone through a bunch of adjustments, but currently, as far as I can see it's: if systemctl -q is-enabled systemd-resolved.service &>/dev/null && ! systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/resolved.conf 2>/dev/null |

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Barry Scott writes: > On 29 May 2024, at 23:49, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have: > > /etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf > > Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again: > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 May

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Barry Scott
> On 29 May 2024, at 23:49, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have: > > /etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf > > Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again: > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 May 29 09:44 /etc/reso

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-30 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Jeffrey Walton writes: On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 6:55 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have: > > /etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf > > Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again: > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-29 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 6:55 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have: > > /etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf > > Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again: > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 May 29 09:44 /etc/resolv

Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

2024-05-29 Thread Sam Varshavchik
I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have: /etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again: lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 May 29 09:44 /etc/resolv.conf -> ../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf I was confident t

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-06 Thread Roger Heflin
keep a second firefox window open, alt-tab to it run about:performance and it will list out all of your tabs and you can X a specific tab. Try about:performance I have to use it a lot to figure out which tab lost its mind and is slowing everything down because it decided it needs gb's of ram. On

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-06 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023, Roger Heflin wrote: I am surprised that alt-tab does not switch to another app for you. I If it happens again, I'll try it. I'd forgotten all about it. Do not rmember the last time I used it. have used that to switch out of full screen applications and I would not expect

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-06 Thread Roger Heflin
I am surprised that alt-tab does not switch to another app for you. I have used that to switch out of full screen applications and I would not expect firefox/malware to have any way to make the window be able to truly take over the screen. In firefox about:config there are some options that might

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-06 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023, Mike Wright wrote: What would happen if you disconnected from the network just long enough to change the settings on the browser to NOT open new pages in a tab but instead to do it the old-fashioned way: open new pages in their own window. You might be able to X the malware

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-06 Thread Mike Wright
On 10/6/23 07:58, Michael Hennebry wrote: On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, Joe Zeff wrote: On 10/05/2023 09:15 PM, Tim via users wrote: It's a pity there isn't a hotkey for killing just the frontmost/topmost program.  ALT+F4 will close the top/front window, if they're obeying control, but I mean instantly

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-06 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, Joe Zeff wrote: On 10/05/2023 09:15 PM, Tim via users wrote: It's a pity there isn't a hotkey for killing just the frontmost/topmost program. ALT+F4 will close the top/front window, if they're obeying control, but I mean instantly killing the topmost window despite what it

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-06 Thread Roger Heflin
gt; The malware does three things: > >> 1. It shows an image. > >> 2. It goes fullscreen. > >> 3. It disables buttons. > >> > >> Preventing 1 would seem a really bad idea. > >> I'd like to prevent 2 or 3. > > > > Did you try alt-tab

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-05 Thread Joe Zeff
On 10/05/2023 09:15 PM, Tim via users wrote: It's a pity there isn't a hotkey for killing just the frontmost/topmost program. ALT+F4 will close the top/front window, if they're obeying control, but I mean instantly killing the topmost window despite what it wants. There's a force quit taskbar a

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-05 Thread Tim via users
On Thu, 2023-10-05 at 21:05 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote: > I can switch to another virtual console, > but do not know how to kill just one tab. > I can got out of it by disconnecting the ethernet cable, > but would rather disconnect with the GUI. I always set up the kill the X server hotkey sequ

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-05 Thread Joe Zeff
On 10/05/2023 08:05 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: I can switch to another virtual console, but do not know how to kill just one tab. I can got out of it by disconnecting the ethernet cable, but would rather disconnect with the GUI. I don't think that you can kill one tab or one window, but killin

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-05 Thread Joe Wulf via users
>> Preventing 1 would seem a really bad idea. >> I'd like to prevent 2 or 3. > > Did you try alt-tab to switch to another application (say a terminal) > to kill the tab from the command line? > > I don't think the full screen trick inside firefox can stop that, and

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-05 Thread Michael Hennebry
d idea. I'd like to prevent 2 or 3. Did you try alt-tab to switch to another application (say a terminal) to kill the tab from the command line? I don't think the full screen trick inside firefox can stop that, and I think I have hit a few of these half-assed websites before, but alt-tab mu

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-05 Thread Roger Heflin
isables buttons. > > Preventing 1 would seem a really bad idea. > I'd like to prevent 2 or 3. Did you try alt-tab to switch to another application (say a terminal) to kill the tab from the command line? I don't think the full screen trick inside firefox can stop that, and I th

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-05 Thread Joe Zeff
On 10/05/2023 12:10 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: Going fullscreen is part if what makes it hard to even try to make it go away. It sounds like you may need an indirect approach. Can you get to a different virtual console? If so, you may be able to find and kill the malware using top. If no

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-05 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, George N. White III wrote: On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 11:19?AM Michael Hennebry < henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote: This is trying to cure the disease by eliminating a symptom. You don't know what is happening behind that full screen. Going fullscreen is part if what

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-01 Thread stan via users
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 09:18:59 -0500 (CDT) Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, stan via users wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:06:46 -0500 (CDT) > > I think it is done by running javascript through your version of > > firefox. Do you have noscript add-on installed? That will block

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-10-01 Thread stan via users
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 09:18:59 -0500 (CDT) Michael Hennebry wrote: > Noscript was already installed nand active. > It did not complain. > > I'm not clear on what this means. > The url window showed .cloudfront.net . > > I already had noscript installed and it did not complain. > Then you have cl

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-09-30 Thread George N. White III
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 11:19 AM Michael Hennebry < henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, stan via users wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:06:46 -0500 (CDT) > > I think it is done by running javascript through your version of > > firefox. Do you have noscript add-on inst

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-09-30 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, stan via users wrote: On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:06:46 -0500 (CDT) I think it is done by running javascript through your version of firefox. Do you have noscript add-on installed? That will block any Noscript was already installed nand active. It did not complain. javascri

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-09-27 Thread stan via users
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:06:46 -0500 (CDT) Michael Hennebry wrote: > I stumbled onto a very bad website: > d1ykbfcai6wsme dot cloudfront dot net slash werrx01 slash > phone=+1 dash 888 dash 387 dash 3976 &# . > firefox went fullscreen and kept telling me that > my computer was locked because, with

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-09-26 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023, Michael Hennebry wrote: I the meantime, how do I blacklist those addresses? Oops. In the meantime, how do I blacklist those addresses? -- Michael henne...@mail.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Occasionally irrational explanations are required" -- Luke Roman ___

Re: How do I stop this malware

2023-09-26 Thread Barry
> On 26 Sep 2023, at 18:07, Michael Hennebry > wrote: > > How is that sort of thing done and > how do I keep it from happening again? There are products that will help protect you. take more care about the links you click on is good advice. > > I the meantime, how do I blacklist those addre

How do I stop this malware

2023-09-26 Thread Michael Hennebry
I stumbled onto a very bad website: d1ykbfcai6wsme dot cloudfront dot net slash werrx01 slash phone=+1 dash 888 dash 387 dash 3976 &# . nslookup gives several IP addresses for it: 13.227.44.(3, 62, 26, 12) and 2600:9000:21fa:(ca, ce, 14, 2e, 7e, b6, c2, ee)00:1:6351:b980:21 firefox went fullscre

Re: vim question - how to stop auto comments

2023-01-31 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Sbob said: > Anyone know how to disable the vim feature where it auto comments > all lines after a comment, meaning if I add a comment line and then > hit enter for a new line I do not want the new line to automatically > hace a comment (#) char... it's driving me nuts! What you

Re: vim question - how to stop auto comments (SOLVED)

2023-01-31 Thread Sbob
Just a heads up, I solved this by adding this line to my .vimrc file: autocmd BufNewFile,BufRead * setlocal formatoptions-=ro On 1/31/23 11:25, Sbob wrote: Hi all; Anyone know how to disable the vim feature where it auto comments all lines after a comment, meaning if I add a comment line

vim question - how to stop auto comments

2023-01-31 Thread Sbob
Hi all; Anyone know how to disable the vim feature where it auto comments all lines after a comment, meaning if I add a comment line and then hit enter for a new line I do not want the new line to automatically hace a comment (#) char... it's driving me nuts! Thanks in advance __

Re: Stop GDM showing notifications?

2020-12-04 Thread Jonathan Billings
> On Dec 3, 2020, at 20:13, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > If you can figure out the setting you need to change, you can add it to the > dconf database in /etc/dconf. This is where I put configuration for gdm’s dconf settings. For example, this is how you set the login banner: https://help.gnome.org/

Re: Stop GDM showing notifications?

2020-12-03 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:12:27 -0800 Samuel Sieb wrote: > these are the steps that worked for me on Wayland Sounds like useful info. I'll play around when I have time. Thanks. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an e

Re: Stop GDM showing notifications?

2020-12-03 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 12/3/20 4:32 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: Can I run dconf-editor for a different user? (user gdm), or find some other magical way to disable the notifications that pop up while logging in? If you can figure out the setting you need to change, you can add it to the dconf database in /etc/dconf. T

Stop GDM showing notifications?

2020-12-03 Thread Tom Horsley
Can I run dconf-editor for a different user? (user gdm), or find some other magical way to disable the notifications that pop up while logging in? In particular there is a persistently annoying notification that my mouse battery is low. I'm fairly certain it is really the keyboard battery it is ta

Re: stop service

2020-11-04 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Nov 4, 2020, at 03:54, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > 0::/system.slice/dwagent.service There you go, it was started by the system unit ‘dwagent.service’. It isn’t a user service or launched inside a user session. -- Jonathan Billings ___ users mailing

Re: stop service

2020-11-04 Thread Patrick Dupre
Thanks you very much > >> On Nov 3, 2020, at 09:57, Patrick Dupre wrote: > >>> ps > >>> root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00 > >>> /bin/sh /usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run > >>> > >>> How

Re: stop service

2020-11-04 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/11/2020 16:54, Patrick Dupre wrote: On Nov 3, 2020, at 09:57, Patrick Dupre wrote: ps root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run How can I stop/restart it? Run ‘cat /proc/34852/cgroup’ and you will see the systemd

Re: stop service

2020-11-04 Thread Patrick Dupre
> > On Nov 3, 2020, at 09:57, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > > ps > > root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00 /bin/sh > > /usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run > > > > How can I stop/restart it? > > Run ‘cat /proc/34852/c

Re: stop service

2020-11-03 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Nov 3, 2020, at 09:57, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > ps > root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00 /bin/sh > /usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run > > How can I stop/restart it? Run ‘cat /proc/34852/cgroup’ and you will see the systemd service na

Re: stop service

2020-11-03 Thread Ed Greshko
On 03/11/2020 22:56, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I have dwservice running, ps root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run How can I stop/restart it? You are asking about something not included with Fedora, right? You are

Re: stop service

2020-11-03 Thread Patrick Dupre
This what I tried, but: systemctl status dwservice Unit dwservice.service could not be found. or Unit dwagsvc.service could not be found.     like   systemctl [start|stop|etc]  dwservice    ???   On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 6

Re: stop service

2020-11-03 Thread Jack Craig
like systemctl [start|stop|etc] dwservice??? On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 6:57 AM Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > I have dwservice running, > > ps > root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0

stop service

2020-11-03 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello, I have dwservice running, ps root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run How can I stop/restart it? Thanks. === Patrick DUPRÉ

f32 libinput :: stop it from disabling the keyboard

2020-07-08 Thread Adrian Sevcenco
Hi! Does anyone have an idea how can i stop that libinput crap forcing my latop in tablet mode and by this disabling the keyboard and touchpad? This effectively bricked my latop! is not longer usable! This happened just just after an update, but because there were many packages i cannot narrow

Re: STOP mailing list

2020-07-07 Thread Doug H.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, at 3:57 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 03:34 -0700, dco...@efn.org wrote: > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or > > > body 'help' to > > >users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org Or maybe: To unsubscribe send

Re: STOP mailing list

2020-07-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 03:34 -0700, dco...@efn.org wrote: > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or > > body 'help' to > >users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject

stop

2020-07-07 Thread dcooke
> Send users mailing list submissions to > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or > body 'help' to > users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > users-ow...@lists.fedorap

STOP mailing list

2020-07-07 Thread dcooke
D: > <06f83eb8b1df03e25b0dbd10876b74fb40ddb015.ca...@mailbox.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > I'm trying to do a very simple task on my Fedora 32 desktop but somehow > I can't make it happen. &g

Re: a stop job.... systemd again and again....

2019-06-05 Thread Tom Horsley
I never had that error, but I had other rc.local problems which led me to do this: /etc/rc.d/rc.local just looks like: /usr/bin/at -M now <<'HERE' > /dev/null 2>&1 /etc/rc.d/the-real-rc.local HERE touch /var/lock/subsys/local Then /etc/rc.d/the-real-rc.local has all the stuff I used to put in r

Re: a stop job.... systemd again and again....

2019-06-05 Thread stan via users
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 12:05:08 +0200 François Patte wrote: > "a stop job is running for rc.local compatibility no limit" > > This a new fantasy of systemd on my system when I shut it down and > there is "no limit": after half a hour, the computer stops with th

a stop job.... systemd again and again....

2019-06-05 Thread François Patte
Bonjour, "a stop job is running for rc.local compatibility no limit" This a new fantasy of systemd on my system when I shut it down and there is "no limit": after half a hour, the computer stops with this message: "forcibly powering off: job timed out". This i

Re: A stop job is running for Entropy Gatherer Daemon? Really?

2019-05-05 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 5/5/19 6:07 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: But the service knows that. Why isn't there a way to tell systemd that in the .service file? There's no use case for it.  rngd is expected to terminate (more or less) immediately after it gets sigterm.  If there were another directive to ignore shutdown

Re: A stop job is running for Entropy Gatherer Daemon? Really?

2019-05-05 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Tom Horsley writes: On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:12:11 -0600 Joe Zeff wrote: > Because systemd has no way of knowing what the service is doing or that > it's safe to kill it without waiting for it to finish. But the service knows that. Why isn't there a way to tell systemd that in the .service file?

Re: A stop job is running for Entropy Gatherer Daemon? Really?

2019-05-05 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:12:11 -0600 Joe Zeff wrote: > Because systemd has no way of knowing what the service is doing or that > it's safe to kill it without waiting for it to finish. But the service knows that. Why isn't there a way to tell systemd that in the .service file? __

Re: A stop job is running for Entropy Gatherer Daemon? Really?

2019-05-05 Thread Tim via users
Allegedly, on or about 4 May 2019, Tom Horsley sent: > Though a sane person might ask, "Why is it the right thing to wait > for a service gathering information which will be utterly discarded > on the reboot anyway?" Well, much as I hate to defend systemd, *it* doesn't know that *that* service is

Re: A stop job is running for Entropy Gatherer Daemon? Really?

2019-05-04 Thread Joe Zeff
On 05/04/2019 08:20 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Sat, 4 May 2019 18:58:32 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: We don't need tortured logic to blame systemd.  It's doing the right thing. Though a sane person might ask, "Why is it the right thing to wait for a service gathering information which will be ut

  1   2   3   4   >