f my sanity, and maybe it'll help others, I've made these changes:
browser.fixup.fallback-to-https = false
This should stop any time I want to go to http://192.168.1.254 changing
without my authority to https://192.168.1.254. As far as I'm concerned
that should never have happened,
do NOT have HTTPS. Most things don't need it. It just increases
workload to encrypt unimportant things.
And I wish they'd stop hiding HTTP and HTTPS in the address bar. Let
me see the letters there so I know what it's doing.
Does anybody have any answers about how to force the
things
do NOT have HTTPS. Most things don't need it. It just increases
workload to encrypt unimportant things.
And I wish they'd stop hiding HTTP and HTTPS in the address bar. Let
me see the letters there so I know what it's doing.
Does anybody have any answers about how to for
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 14:32, Tim via users
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just thought I'd try asking here, because I'm not having much luck with
> Google...
>
> Many times, way too many damn times, if I try to access some address
> with Firefox it will go into HTTPS mode when I don't want it to.
Untested b
>
> G, I hate autocorrect style of crap everywhere they put it.
>
> The HTTPS-only modes are disabled. Stupid option that is. Many things
> do NOT have HTTPS. Most things don't need it. It just increases
> workload to encrypt unimportant things.
>
> And I w
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 09:25:33PM +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 21:39 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> > So when do you plan to actually STOP POSTING?
>
> WHEN I DAMN WELL FEEL LIKE IT!
>
> When do you plan to take your head out of your ass?
>
When a top post quotes boilerplate,
one case be certain that it's a case of
don't care or TH;DDI.
--
Michael henne...@mail.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental technical
reasons* why it is necessary to sacrifice a young
goat to your SCSI chain now and then." -- John
On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 21:39 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> So when do you plan to actually STOP POSTING?
WHEN I DAMN WELL FEEL LIKE IT!
When do you plan to take your head out of your ass?
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.119.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 4 14:43:51 UTC 2024 x86
So when do you plan to actually STOP POSTING?
On 10/31/2024 9:20 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Fri, 2024-11-01 at 09:00 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
I understand the list guidelines specify to not top post, which I
follow, I was just curious as to why.
I hadn't looked at the guidelines for
On Fri, 2024-11-01 at 09:00 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I understand the list guidelines specify to not top post, which I
> follow, I was just curious as to why.
I hadn't looked at the guidelines for ages, but it *does* help *some*
people actually pay attention to following them when it gives s
On 31/10/24 09:25, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/30/2024 03:46 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
although having said that I also get annoyed if I have to read
through multiple mail threads to get the full context of what the
reply is addressing, and in my view it is bad mail etiquette to not
include that con
On 10/30/24 3:16 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 31/10/24 09:04, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
The only sensible answer. It spoils the logical sequence.
No problems, thankyou, I was just curious because the other thing I
forgot to mention is those organisations also had the "standard" that if
your
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 6:17 PM Stephen Morris
wrote:
... snip ...
No problems, thankyou, I was just curious because the other thing I forgot
> to mention is those organisations also had the "standard" that if your
> reply was not top posted your reply would not be read.
>
I'll add that
a) most
On 10/30/2024 03:46 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
although having said that I also get annoyed if I have to read through
multiple mail threads to get the full context of what the reply is
addressing, and in my view it is bad mail etiquette to not include that context
Yes, you include enough text t
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:54:47 -0400
"Felix Miata" wrote:
> Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100):
>
> > Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in
> > consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are the
> > reasons for this mail list to
On 31/10/24 09:04, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:54:47 -0400
"Felix Miata" wrote:
Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100):
Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in
consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are
Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100):
> Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in
> consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are the
> reasons for this mail list to be averse to that methodology (just curious).
A: Top-posters who
On 30/10/24 21:06, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 17:26 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
On 10/29/24 15:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
All I had to do in Evolution in replying to this was mark the text
above before hitting Reply to List. No editing required.
Nice tip! Also works in
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 17:26 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
> On 10/29/24 15:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > All I had to do in Evolution in replying to this was mark the text
> > above before hitting Reply to List. No editing required.
>
> Nice tip! Also works in Thunderbird.
It also used to work
On 10/29/24 15:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
All I had to do in Evolution in replying to this was mark the text
above before hitting Reply to List. No editing required.
Nice tip! Also works in Thunderbird.
:m
--
___
users mailing list -- users@list
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 14:57 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> > It makes it damn near impossible to read the message. And clearly,
> > from the lack of attention being paid to what's said in a couple of
> > recent threads, you're not reading it all, anyway.
>
> What annoys me is having the scan th
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Tim via users wrote:
When you post to this group crop out all the quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes quotes of quotes of
It makes it damn near impossible to re
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 23:19 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> When you post to this group crop out all the quotes of quotes of quotes
> of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes
[...]
> It makes it damn near impossible to read the message. And clearly,
> from the lack of
When you post to this group crop out all the quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quot
Jeffrey Walton writes:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 6:42 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Tim via users writes:
>
> > Tim:
> > >> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post-
> > >> install?
> >
> > Kevin Fenzi:
> > > No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact o
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 6:42 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Tim via users writes:
>
> > Tim:
> > >> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post-
> > >> install?
> >
> > Kevin Fenzi:
> > > No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact of the way
> > > some insta
Tim via users writes:
Tim:
>> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post-
>> install?
Kevin Fenzi:
> No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact of the way
> some installs work that it's there. There was some talk about it
> removing itself at the end,
Tim:
>> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post-
>> install?
Kevin Fenzi:
> No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact of the way
> some installs work that it's there. There was some talk about it
> removing itself at the end, but I am not sure where t
On Sat, Jun 01, 2024 at 06:07:24AM GMT, Tim via users wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 08:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Interesting. So, the only thing I see that requires systemd-resolved
> > is anaconda-core. However, systemd itself has a 'recommends' for it,
> > so perhaps thats what pulled it
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 08:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Interesting. So, the only thing I see that requires systemd-resolved
> is anaconda-core. However, systemd itself has a 'recommends' for it,
> so perhaps thats what pulled it back in?
>
> So, possibly keeping it installed, but masked is a bett
Sam Varshavchik composed on 2024-05-31 12:13 (UTC-0400):
> Masking is just solving the X of an XY problem. Either the dependencies
> being masked are not needed, or if they are needed masking would break
> something.
I like KISS:
# inxi -Sz
System:
Kernel: 6.8.11-300.fc40.x86_64 arch: x86_
Kevin Fenzi writes:
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 04:25:44PM GMT, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi writes:
>
> > So, I think if you:
> >
> > disable systemd-resolved
> > or
> > make /etc/resolv.conf a real file, not a link.
> > or
> > set 'DNSStubListener=no' in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf
> >
> >
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 04:25:44PM GMT, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi writes:
>
> > So, I think if you:
> >
> > disable systemd-resolved
> > or
> > make /etc/resolv.conf a real file, not a link.
> > or
> > set 'DNSStubListener=no' in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf
> >
> > It will not be repla
Samuel Sieb writes:
On 5/30/24 3:44 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:06 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/30/24 2:12 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I guess what the logic or script is missing (the one Kevin detailed)
is, what to do if NetworkManager is installed and running. That see
On 5/30/24 3:44 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:06 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/30/24 2:12 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I guess what the logic or script is missing (the one Kevin detailed)
is, what to do if NetworkManager is installed and running. That seems
like where the prob
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:06 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 5/30/24 2:12 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > I guess what the logic or script is missing (the one Kevin detailed)
> > is, what to do if NetworkManager is installed and running. That seems
> > like where the problem occured in your case. In yo
preset/20-systemd-resolved-disable.preset'
Here's one that doesn't eat yet another inode ( and saves some typing )
for f in disable stop mask; do sudo systemctl $f systemd-resolved; done
--
I just wasted at least a week with systemd-networkd trying to configure
half a dozen or so b
On 5/30/24 2:12 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I guess what the logic or script is missing (the one Kevin detailed)
is, what to do if NetworkManager is installed and running. That seems
like where the problem occured in your case. In your case (and others
like you), it seems like the condition 'Networ
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 4:33 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Todd Zullinger writes:
>
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > [...snip loads of useful information...]
> > > So, I think if you:
> > >
> > > disable systemd-resolved
> >
> > To that end, the change proposal¹ when systemd-resolved was
> > enabled by
Todd Zullinger writes:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[...snip loads of useful information...]
> So, I think if you:
>
> disable systemd-resolved
To that end, the change proposal¹ when systemd-resolved was
enabled by default (F33) contains an example of how to
ensure the service remains disabled -- which w
Kevin Fenzi writes:
So, I think if you:
disable systemd-resolved
or
make /etc/resolv.conf a real file, not a link.
or
set 'DNSStubListener=no' in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf
It will not be replaced anymore.
I did not even /have/ systemd-resolved installed.
dnf system-upgrade installed it on
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[...snip loads of useful information...]
> So, I think if you:
>
> disable systemd-resolved
To that end, the change proposal¹ when systemd-resolved was
enabled by default (F33) contains an example of how to
ensure the service remains disabled -- which would avoid the
situation
For whatever it's worth, the logic to replace or not replace
/etc/resolv.conf has gone through a bunch of adjustments, but currently,
as far as I can see it's:
if systemctl -q is-enabled systemd-resolved.service &>/dev/null &&
! systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/resolved.conf 2>/dev/null |
Barry Scott writes:
> On 29 May 2024, at 23:49, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have:
>
> /etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf
>
> Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 May
> On 29 May 2024, at 23:49, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have:
>
> /etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf
>
> Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 May 29 09:44 /etc/reso
Jeffrey Walton writes:
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 6:55 PM Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
>
> I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have:
>
> /etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf
>
> Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 6:55 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have:
>
> /etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf
>
> Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 May 29 09:44 /etc/resolv
I updated from F39 to F40. I used to have:
/etc/resolv.conf -> /run/NetworkManager/no-stub-resolv.conf
Everything got messed up because the update hijacked this symlink again:
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 May 29 09:44 /etc/resolv.conf ->
../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf
I was confident t
keep a second firefox window open, alt-tab to it run about:performance
and it will list out all of your tabs and you can X a specific tab.
Try about:performance I have to use it a lot to figure out which tab
lost its mind and is slowing everything down because it decided it
needs gb's of ram.
On
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023, Roger Heflin wrote:
I am surprised that alt-tab does not switch to another app for you. I
If it happens again, I'll try it.
I'd forgotten all about it.
Do not rmember the last time I used it.
have used that to switch out of full screen applications and I would
not expect
I am surprised that alt-tab does not switch to another app for you. I
have used that to switch out of full screen applications and I would
not expect firefox/malware to have any way to make the window be able
to truly take over the screen.
In firefox about:config there are some options that might
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023, Mike Wright wrote:
What would happen if you disconnected from the network just long enough to
change the settings on the browser to NOT open new pages in a tab but
instead to do it the old-fashioned way: open new pages in their own window.
You might be able to X the malware
On 10/6/23 07:58, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/05/2023 09:15 PM, Tim via users wrote:
It's a pity there isn't a hotkey for killing just the frontmost/topmost
program. ALT+F4 will close the top/front window, if they're obeying
control, but I mean instantly
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/05/2023 09:15 PM, Tim via users wrote:
It's a pity there isn't a hotkey for killing just the frontmost/topmost
program. ALT+F4 will close the top/front window, if they're obeying
control, but I mean instantly killing the topmost window despite what
it
gt; The malware does three things:
> >> 1. It shows an image.
> >> 2. It goes fullscreen.
> >> 3. It disables buttons.
> >>
> >> Preventing 1 would seem a really bad idea.
> >> I'd like to prevent 2 or 3.
> >
> > Did you try alt-tab
On 10/05/2023 09:15 PM, Tim via users wrote:
It's a pity there isn't a hotkey for killing just the frontmost/topmost
program. ALT+F4 will close the top/front window, if they're obeying
control, but I mean instantly killing the topmost window despite what
it wants. There's a force quit taskbar a
On Thu, 2023-10-05 at 21:05 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> I can switch to another virtual console,
> but do not know how to kill just one tab.
> I can got out of it by disconnecting the ethernet cable,
> but would rather disconnect with the GUI.
I always set up the kill the X server hotkey sequ
On 10/05/2023 08:05 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I can switch to another virtual console,
but do not know how to kill just one tab.
I can got out of it by disconnecting the ethernet cable,
but would rather disconnect with the GUI.
I don't think that you can kill one tab or one window, but killin
>> Preventing 1 would seem a really bad idea.
>> I'd like to prevent 2 or 3.
>
> Did you try alt-tab to switch to another application (say a terminal)
> to kill the tab from the command line?
>
> I don't think the full screen trick inside firefox can stop that, and
d idea.
I'd like to prevent 2 or 3.
Did you try alt-tab to switch to another application (say a terminal)
to kill the tab from the command line?
I don't think the full screen trick inside firefox can stop that, and
I think I have hit a few of these half-assed websites before, but
alt-tab mu
isables buttons.
>
> Preventing 1 would seem a really bad idea.
> I'd like to prevent 2 or 3.
Did you try alt-tab to switch to another application (say a terminal)
to kill the tab from the command line?
I don't think the full screen trick inside firefox can stop that, and
I th
On 10/05/2023 12:10 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Going fullscreen is part if what makes
it hard to even try to make it go away.
It sounds like you may need an indirect approach. Can you get to a
different virtual console? If so, you may be able to find and kill the
malware using top. If no
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, George N. White III wrote:
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 11:19?AM Michael Hennebry <
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote:
This is trying to cure the disease by eliminating a symptom. You don't
know what is
happening behind that full screen.
Going fullscreen is part if what
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 09:18:59 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, stan via users wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:06:46 -0500 (CDT)
> > I think it is done by running javascript through your version of
> > firefox. Do you have noscript add-on installed? That will block
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 09:18:59 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> Noscript was already installed nand active.
> It did not complain.
>
> I'm not clear on what this means.
> The url window showed .cloudfront.net .
>
> I already had noscript installed and it did not complain.
>
Then you have cl
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 11:19 AM Michael Hennebry <
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, stan via users wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:06:46 -0500 (CDT)
> > I think it is done by running javascript through your version of
> > firefox. Do you have noscript add-on inst
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023, stan via users wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:06:46 -0500 (CDT)
I think it is done by running javascript through your version of
firefox. Do you have noscript add-on installed? That will block any
Noscript was already installed nand active.
It did not complain.
javascri
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:06:46 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> I stumbled onto a very bad website:
> d1ykbfcai6wsme dot cloudfront dot net slash werrx01 slash
> phone=+1 dash 888 dash 387 dash 3976 .
> firefox went fullscreen and kept telling me that
> my computer was locked because, with
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I the meantime, how do I blacklist those addresses?
Oops.
In the meantime, how do I blacklist those addresses?
--
Michael henne...@mail.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"Occasionally irrational explanations are required" -- Luke Roman
___
> On 26 Sep 2023, at 18:07, Michael Hennebry
> wrote:
>
> How is that sort of thing done and
> how do I keep it from happening again?
There are products that will help protect you.
take more care about the links you click on is good advice.
>
> I the meantime, how do I blacklist those addre
I stumbled onto a very bad website:
d1ykbfcai6wsme dot cloudfront dot net slash werrx01 slash
phone=+1 dash 888 dash 387 dash 3976 .
nslookup gives several IP addresses for it:
13.227.44.(3, 62, 26, 12) and
2600:9000:21fa:(ca, ce, 14, 2e, 7e, b6, c2, ee)00:1:6351:b980:21
firefox went fullscre
Once upon a time, Sbob said:
> Anyone know how to disable the vim feature where it auto comments
> all lines after a comment, meaning if I add a comment line and then
> hit enter for a new line I do not want the new line to automatically
> hace a comment (#) char... it's driving me nuts!
What you
Just a heads up, I solved this by adding this line to my .vimrc file:
autocmd BufNewFile,BufRead * setlocal formatoptions-=ro
On 1/31/23 11:25, Sbob wrote:
Hi all;
Anyone know how to disable the vim feature where it auto comments all
lines after a comment, meaning if I add a comment line
Hi all;
Anyone know how to disable the vim feature where it auto comments all
lines after a comment, meaning if I add a comment line and then hit
enter for a new line I do not want the new line to automatically hace a
comment (#) char... it's driving me nuts!
Thanks in advance
__
> On Dec 3, 2020, at 20:13, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> If you can figure out the setting you need to change, you can add it to the
> dconf database in /etc/dconf.
This is where I put configuration for gdm’s dconf settings. For example, this
is how you set the login banner:
https://help.gnome.org/
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:12:27 -0800
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> these are the steps that worked for me on Wayland
Sounds like useful info. I'll play around when I have time.
Thanks.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
On 12/3/20 4:32 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
Can I run dconf-editor for a different user? (user gdm), or
find some other magical way to disable the notifications
that pop up while logging in?
If you can figure out the setting you need to change, you can add it to
the dconf database in /etc/dconf.
T
Can I run dconf-editor for a different user? (user gdm), or
find some other magical way to disable the notifications
that pop up while logging in?
In particular there is a persistently annoying notification
that my mouse battery is low. I'm fairly certain it is really
the keyboard battery it is ta
On Nov 4, 2020, at 03:54, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> 0::/system.slice/dwagent.service
There you go, it was started by the system unit ‘dwagent.service’. It isn’t a
user service or launched inside a user session.
--
Jonathan Billings
___
users mailing
Thanks you very much
> >> On Nov 3, 2020, at 09:57, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >>> ps
> >>> root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00
> >>> /bin/sh /usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run
> >>>
> >>> How
On 04/11/2020 16:54, Patrick Dupre wrote:
On Nov 3, 2020, at 09:57, Patrick Dupre wrote:
ps
root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00 /bin/sh
/usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run
How can I stop/restart it?
Run ‘cat /proc/34852/cgroup’ and you will see the systemd
>
> On Nov 3, 2020, at 09:57, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >
> > ps
> > root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00 /bin/sh
> > /usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run
> >
> > How can I stop/restart it?
>
> Run ‘cat /proc/34852/c
On Nov 3, 2020, at 09:57, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> ps
> root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00 /bin/sh
> /usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run
>
> How can I stop/restart it?
Run ‘cat /proc/34852/cgroup’ and you will see the systemd service na
On 03/11/2020 22:56, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
I have dwservice running,
ps
root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00 /bin/sh
/usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run
How can I stop/restart it?
You are asking about something not included with Fedora, right?
You are
This what I tried, but:
systemctl status dwservice
Unit dwservice.service could not be found.
or
Unit dwagsvc.service could not be found.
like
systemctl [start|stop|etc] dwservice ???
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 6
like
systemctl [start|stop|etc]
dwservice???
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 6:57 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have dwservice running,
>
> ps
> root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0
Hello,
I have dwservice running,
ps
root 34852 0.0 0.0 217124 3336 ?SOct29 0:00 /bin/sh
/usr/local/dwagent/native/dwagsvc run
How can I stop/restart it?
Thanks.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ
Hi! Does anyone have an idea how can i stop that libinput crap forcing
my latop in tablet mode and by this disabling the keyboard and touchpad?
This effectively bricked my latop! is not longer usable!
This happened just just after an update, but because there were many
packages i cannot narrow
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, at 3:57 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 03:34 -0700, dco...@efn.org wrote:
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
> > > body 'help' to
> > >users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Or maybe:
To unsubscribe send
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 03:34 -0700, dco...@efn.org wrote:
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
> > body 'help' to
> >users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org
poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject
> Send users mailing list submissions to
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
> body 'help' to
> users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> users-ow...@lists.fedorap
D:
> <06f83eb8b1df03e25b0dbd10876b74fb40ddb015.ca...@mailbox.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> I'm trying to do a very simple task on my Fedora 32 desktop but somehow
> I can't make it happen.
&g
I never had that error, but I had other rc.local
problems which led me to do this:
/etc/rc.d/rc.local just looks like:
/usr/bin/at -M now <<'HERE' > /dev/null 2>&1
/etc/rc.d/the-real-rc.local
HERE
touch /var/lock/subsys/local
Then /etc/rc.d/the-real-rc.local has all the stuff
I used to put in r
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 12:05:08 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> "a stop job is running for rc.local compatibility no limit"
>
> This a new fantasy of systemd on my system when I shut it down and
> there is "no limit": after half a hour, the computer stops with th
Bonjour,
"a stop job is running for rc.local compatibility no limit"
This a new fantasy of systemd on my system when I shut it down and there
is "no limit": after half a hour, the computer stops with this message:
"forcibly powering off: job timed out".
This i
On 5/5/19 6:07 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
But the service knows that. Why isn't there a way to tell
systemd that in the .service file?
There's no use case for it. rngd is expected to terminate (more or
less) immediately after it gets sigterm. If there were another
directive to ignore shutdown
Tom Horsley writes:
On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:12:11 -0600
Joe Zeff wrote:
> Because systemd has no way of knowing what the service is doing or that
> it's safe to kill it without waiting for it to finish.
But the service knows that. Why isn't there a way to tell
systemd that in the .service file?
On Sat, 4 May 2019 22:12:11 -0600
Joe Zeff wrote:
> Because systemd has no way of knowing what the service is doing or that
> it's safe to kill it without waiting for it to finish.
But the service knows that. Why isn't there a way to tell
systemd that in the .service file?
__
Allegedly, on or about 4 May 2019, Tom Horsley sent:
> Though a sane person might ask, "Why is it the right thing to wait
> for a service gathering information which will be utterly discarded
> on the reboot anyway?"
Well, much as I hate to defend systemd, *it* doesn't know that *that*
service is
On 05/04/2019 08:20 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 4 May 2019 18:58:32 -0700
Gordon Messmer wrote:
We don't need tortured logic to blame systemd. It's doing the right
thing.
Though a sane person might ask, "Why is it the right thing to wait
for a service gathering information which will be ut
1 - 100 of 312 matches
Mail list logo