Re: stdio.h

2024-01-31 Thread Bill Cunningham
scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> r

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-31 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:21:50 -0500 Jon LaBadie wrote: Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86 whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot) The reason is that the name of the glibc-headers RPM is in fact glibc-headers-x86 rpm -qi glibc-headers-x86 Name: glibc-headers-x86

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-30 Thread Francis . Montagnac
Hi. On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:21:50 -0500 Jon LaBadie wrote: > $ rpm --verify glibc-headers-x86 > $ rpm --verify glibc-devel.x86_64 > After renaming stdio.h the first command reports it as missing. > Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86 > whereas most packages use .x86 (da

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-30 Thread Jon LaBadie
and the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-30 Thread Bill Cunningham
esent. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? I'm on f38 vs f39, but I get: $ sudo dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h [sudo] password for [deleted]: Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:29 ago on Mon 29 Jan 2024 09:02:39 PM EST. glibc-headers-s390-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : Additional internal he

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-30 Thread Bill Cunningham
s and glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch $ dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h glibc

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-30 Thread Barry Scott
> On 30 Jan 2024, at 09:28, Barry Scott wrote: > > > >> On 30 Jan 2024, at 00:23, Tom Horsley wrote: >> >> On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: >> >> zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h >> glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-30 Thread Barry Scott
> On 30 Jan 2024, at 00:23, Tom Horsley wrote: > > On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: > > zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h > glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch > -- On mine its from glibc-devel not glibc-headers... : [1] root $ cat /e

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-30 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 1/30/24 01:40, Bill Cunningham wrote: On 1/29/2024 7:23 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch I tried dnf reinstall with that rpm. It (stdio.h) still isn't in /usr/include. I'm really at a loss here with this o

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-29 Thread Jon LaBadie
d. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch $ dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : \ Ad

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-29 Thread Go Canes
any idea what is going on? I'm on f38 vs f39, but I get: $ sudo dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h [sudo] password for [deleted]: Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:29 ago on Mon 29 Jan 2024 09:02:39 PM EST. glibc-headers-s390-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : Additional int

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-29 Thread Bill Cunningham
s are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch I tried dnf reinstall with that rpm. It (stdio.h) still isn't in /usr/include. I'm really a

Re: stdio.h

2024-01-29 Thread Tom Horsley
one have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

stdio.h

2024-01-29 Thread Bill Cunningham
 I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? -- __