Re: services vs firewall

2013-07-12 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 07/11/2013 10:41 PM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:09:15 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> One question. Is the nfs server running? >> > > Thanks, good catch! I too figured it wasn't running because nmap reports > closed if the port is open, but nothing's listening on it. So I

Re: services vs firewall

2013-07-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/12/13 12:03, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > Figured this one out too. Looks like by default cupsd was listening on > the localhost only (127.0.0.1). Changed that in /etc/cups/cupsd.conf to OK So, the lesson to be learned is. Don't respond to your queries quickly. :-) :-) -- The only t

Re: services vs firewall

2013-07-11 Thread Amadeus W.M.
> 44) root:~> netstat -tupan | grep cups tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:631 > 0.0.0.0:* > LISTEN 1330/cupsd tcp6 0 0 ::1:631 :::* > LISTEN 1330/cupsd > Figured this one out too. Looks like by default cupsd was listening on the localhost only (127.0

Re: services vs firewall

2013-07-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/12/13 11:52, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 07/12/13 11:41, Amadeus W.M. wrote: >> 44) root:~> netstat -tupan | grep cups >> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:* >> LISTEN 1330/cupsd > cupsd is listening only on 127.0.0.1 > This is the default From

Re: services vs firewall

2013-07-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/12/13 11:41, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > 44) root:~> netstat -tupan | grep cups > tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:* > LISTEN 1330/cupsd cupsd is listening only on 127.0.0.1 -- The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer. -

Re: services vs firewall

2013-07-11 Thread Amadeus W.M.
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:09:15 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 07/12/13 10:15, Amadeus W.M. wrote: >> So the service is enabled and the port isn't? What's the point of >> enabling services if it doesn't open the appropriate port? An nmap scan >> from another machine shows >> >> 111 tcp open 631 tcp cl

Re: services vs firewall

2013-07-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/12/13 10:15, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > So the service is enabled and the port isn't? What's the point of > enabling services if it doesn't open the appropriate port? An nmap scan > from another machine shows > > 111 tcp open > 631 tcp closed > 2049 tcp closed > > Could someone help me understan

services vs firewall

2013-07-11 Thread Amadeus W.M.
I'm trying to configure nfs and printing for my local network. I got that working a few days ago, but now it seems lost. The firewall configuration I mean. Take nfs. I had the server configured on one of the machines with the proper open ports, and I was able to access the nfs shares from othe